Fixed
Status Update
Comments
se...@google.com <se...@google.com> #2
Thank you for reporting this issue. For us to further investigate this issue, please provide the following additional information:
Android build
Which Android build are you using? (e.g. OPP1.170223.012)
Please provide sample project or apk to reproduce the issue. Also mention the steps to be followed for reproducing the issue with the given sample project or apk.
Frequency
How frequently does this issue occur? (e.g 100% of the time, 10% of the time)
Android bug report capturing (kindly share complete bugreport)
After reproducing the issue, press the volume up, volume down, and power button simultaneously. This will capture a bug report on your device in the “bug reports” directory.
Alternate method
After reproducing the issue, navigate to “developer settings”, ensure “USB debugging” is enabled, then enable “Bug report shortcut”. Capture bug report by holding the power button and selecting the “Take bug report” option.
Screen capture of the issue
Press the volume down and power buttons simultaneously. The image will appear in your gallery. Attach the screenshot file to this issue.
Note: Please upload the files to google drive and share the folder to android-bugreport@google.com, then share the link here.
Android build
Which Android build are you using? (e.g. OPP1.170223.012)
Please provide sample project or apk to reproduce the issue. Also mention the steps to be followed for reproducing the issue with the given sample project or apk.
Frequency
How frequently does this issue occur? (e.g 100% of the time, 10% of the time)
Android bug report capturing (kindly share complete bugreport)
After reproducing the issue, press the volume up, volume down, and power button simultaneously. This will capture a bug report on your device in the “bug reports” directory.
Alternate method
After reproducing the issue, navigate to “developer settings”, ensure “USB debugging” is enabled, then enable “Bug report shortcut”. Capture bug report by holding the power button and selecting the “Take bug report” option.
Screen capture of the issue
Press the volume down and power buttons simultaneously. The image will appear in your gallery. Attach the screenshot file to this issue.
Note: Please upload the files to google drive and share the folder to android-bugreport@google.com, then share the link here.
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #3
Android build: N/A - firebase crashlytics doesn't provide that information. It happens on both Android 9 and Android 10.
Sample: N/A - it's a race condition can't reproduce it consistently
Frequency: ~1 %
Android bug report capturing: N/A - firebase crashlytics doesn't provide that information
Problem:
In BiometricFragment the mBundle is not always set - so when isDeviceCredentialAllowed is called the mBundle.getBoolean(BiometricPrompt.KEY_ALLOW_DEVICE_CREDENTIAL, false) throws the NullPointerException.
Sample: N/A - it's a race condition can't reproduce it consistently
Frequency: ~1 %
Android bug report capturing: N/A - firebase crashlytics doesn't provide that information
Problem:
In BiometricFragment the mBundle is not always set - so when isDeviceCredentialAllowed is called the mBundle.getBoolean(BiometricPrompt.KEY_ALLOW_DEVICE_CREDENTIAL, false) throws the NullPointerException.
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #4
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 0b2dee89f68e9ed41c9552a93fee72364253af41
Author: Curtis Belmonte <curtislb@google.com>
Date: Wed Nov 06 10:00:17 2019
Fix possible NPE with BiometricFragment method
The current implementation of
BiometricFragment#setDeviceCredentialAllowed() tries to get a boolean
from mBundle without first checking to see if mBundle is null,
potentially resulting in a NullPointerException. This commit adds in the
null check in order to make calling this method safer. It also adds a
unit test case to exercise this behavior.
Test: ./gradlew biometric:connectedAndroidTest
Fixes: 142599311
Change-Id: I18e03f926ff03c53f8cf1812fbad46ea75db6a32
M biometric/src/androidTest/java/androidx/biometric/BiometricFragmentTest.java
M biometric/src/main/java/androidx/biometric/BiometricFragment.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1159943
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 0b2dee89f68e9ed41c9552a93fee72364253af41
Author: Curtis Belmonte <curtislb@google.com>
Date: Wed Nov 06 10:00:17 2019
Fix possible NPE with BiometricFragment method
The current implementation of
BiometricFragment#setDeviceCredentialAllowed() tries to get a boolean
from mBundle without first checking to see if mBundle is null,
potentially resulting in a NullPointerException. This commit adds in the
null check in order to make calling this method safer. It also adds a
unit test case to exercise this behavior.
Test: ./gradlew biometric:connectedAndroidTest
Fixes: 142599311
Change-Id: I18e03f926ff03c53f8cf1812fbad46ea75db6a32
M biometric/src/androidTest/java/androidx/biometric/BiometricFragmentTest.java
M biometric/src/main/java/androidx/biometric/BiometricFragment.java
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #5
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #6
With 2.2.0-alpha04 (that use Main.immediate), the issue seems to be still there (I tested it by calling emitSource() twice, like your test case)
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #7
yea sorry immediate does not fix it.
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/frameworks/support/+/1112186
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1112186
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
Description
Version used: 2.2.0-alpha01
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Android 9
I'm having some random crashes due to CoroutineLiveData
```
Fatal Exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: This source was already added with the different observer
at androidx.lifecycle.MediatorLiveData.addSource + 89(MediatorLiveData.java:89)
at androidx.lifecycle.CoroutineLiveDataKt.addDisposableSource + 102(CoroutineLiveDataKt.java:102)
at androidx.lifecycle.CoroutineLiveData.emitSource$lifecycle_livedata_ktx_release + 200(CoroutineLiveData.java:200)
at androidx.lifecycle.LiveDataScopeImpl$emitSource$2.invokeSuspend + 89(LiveDataScopeImpl.java:89)
at androidx.lifecycle.LiveDataScopeImpl$emitSource$2.invoke(LiveDataScopeImpl.java:11)
at kotlinx.coroutines.intrinsics.UndispatchedKt.startUndispatchedOrReturn + 91(UndispatchedKt.java:91)
at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__Builders_commonKt.withContext + 156(BuildersKt__Builders_commonKt.java:156)
at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.withContext + 1(BuildersKt.java:1)
at androidx.lifecycle.LiveDataScopeImpl.emitSource + 88(LiveDataScopeImpl.java:88)
at com.geekorum.ttrss.articles_list.FeedsViewModel$refreshed$1.invokeSuspend + 90(FeedsViewModel.java:90)
at com.geekorum.ttrss.articles_list.FeedsViewModel$refreshed$1.invoke(FeedsViewModel.java:8)
at androidx.lifecycle.BlockRunner$maybeRun$1.invokeSuspend + 147(BlockRunner.java:147)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith + 33(BaseContinuationImpl.java:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run + 241(DispatchedTask.java:241)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback + 873(Handler.java:873)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage + 99(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop + 193(Looper.java:193)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main + 6898(ActivityThread.java:6898)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run + 537(RuntimeInit.java:537)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main + 858(ZygoteInit.java:858)
```
From what I understand of CoroutineLiveData source code, when calling `LiveDataScope.emitSource()` the previous source is removed before adding the new one on MediatorLiveData.
```
@MainThread
internal fun emitSource(source: LiveData<T>): DisposableHandle {
clearSource()
val newSource = addDisposableSource(source)
emittedSource = newSource
return newSource
}
```
However the removing is done by launching a new coroutine
```
internal fun <T> MediatorLiveData<T>.addDisposableSource(
source: LiveData<T>
): DisposableHandle {
val disposed = AtomicBoolean(false)
addSource(source) {
if (!disposed.get()) {
value = it
} else {
removeSource(source)
}
}
return object : DisposableHandle {
override fun dispose() {
if (disposed.compareAndSet(false, true)) {
CoroutineScope(Dispatchers.Main).launch {
removeSource(source)
}
}
}
}
}
```
So there is no guarantee that `MediatorLiveData.addSource()` will be called after the removing coroutine is executed. This leads to the IllegalArgumentException in `MediatorLiveData.addSource()`
```
@MainThread
public <S> void addSource(@NonNull LiveData<S> source, @NonNull Observer<? super S> onChanged) {
Source<S> e = new Source<>(source, onChanged);
Source<?> existing = mSources.putIfAbsent(source, e);
if (existing != null && existing.mObserver != onChanged) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"This source was already added with the different observer");
}
if (existing != null) {
return;
}
if (hasActiveObservers()) {
e.plug();
}
}
```