Fixed
Status Update
Comments
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #2
If you need to add a custom Navigator but don't want to subclass NavHost (which we expect will be needed in most cases), the correct approach is to add it before you set your graph:
1) Don't use app:navGraph in your XML
2) Get a reference to your NavController
3) Add your Navigator to the NavController
4) Call setGraph on the NavController
This relies on the fact that NavController waits until the graph is set before restoring state / doing anything at all.
Technically, the createFragmentNavigator() call in NavHostFragment is already called at the same time as your proposed onNavControllerCreated() method so as a workaround, you could override that method, add your Navigator, then return super.createFragmentNavigator().
1) Don't use app:navGraph in your XML
2) Get a reference to your NavController
3) Add your Navigator to the NavController
4) Call setGraph on the NavController
This relies on the fact that NavController waits until the graph is set before restoring state / doing anything at all.
Technically, the createFragmentNavigator() call in NavHostFragment is already called at the same time as your proposed onNavControllerCreated() method so as a workaround, you could override that method, add your Navigator, then return super.createFragmentNavigator().
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com> #3
The first solution does not work, because after screen rotation, the graph (probably a restored graph) is set when Activity.setContentView() is called.
The workaround with createFragmentNavigator() works, though it's not very elegant. Maybe the method could be renamed to createNavigators() and return a list or an array of Navigators?
Anyway, it is a good enough solution for now, so it is not very urgent.
In conclusion:
* I think that a better support for custom destinations should be provided before final release.
* I would suggest describing the "Add support for new destination types" section in the documentation in more details.
Thank you
The workaround with createFragmentNavigator() works, though it's not very elegant. Maybe the method could be renamed to createNavigators() and return a list or an array of Navigators?
Anyway, it is a good enough solution for now, so it is not very urgent.
In conclusion:
* I think that a better support for custom destinations should be provided before final release.
* I would suggest describing the "Add support for new destination types" section in the documentation in more details.
Thank you
za...@gmail.com <za...@gmail.com> #4
I suspect the issue you're running into for the first solution is that you're using the setGraph(R.navigation.graph) method, which does indeed cause it to automatically inflate the graph by id on rotation. Using setGraph(navGraph) where navGraph is a navGraph object you've inflated with navController.getNavInflater().inflate(R.navigation.graph) will never automatically be recreated.
Definitely something we can do better on though :)
Definitely something we can do better on though :)
za...@gmail.com <za...@gmail.com> #5
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit a2e68921841727237528c4ac7076d50af64663c8
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Wed Oct 17 16:46:28 2018
Make setGraph(int) and setGraph(NavGraph) act identically
Remove the auto restore functionality from NavController's
setGraph(int) method so that it functions identically to
setGraph(NavGraph).
This ensures that developers that manually are calling
setGraph() after adding custom navigators don't get
recreated too early.
Test: updated NavController test
BUG: 110763345
Change-Id: I51ae7c74451669d6bfed0fe84df445c2ff272e6e
M navigation/runtime/src/androidTest/java/androidx/navigation/NavControllerTest.kt
M navigation/runtime/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/NavController.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/792819
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/a2e68921841727237528c4ac7076d50af64663c8
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit a2e68921841727237528c4ac7076d50af64663c8
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Wed Oct 17 16:46:28 2018
Make setGraph(int) and setGraph(NavGraph) act identically
Remove the auto restore functionality from NavController's
setGraph(int) method so that it functions identically to
setGraph(NavGraph).
This ensures that developers that manually are calling
setGraph() after adding custom navigators don't get
recreated too early.
Test: updated NavController test
BUG: 110763345
Change-Id: I51ae7c74451669d6bfed0fe84df445c2ff272e6e
M navigation/runtime/src/androidTest/java/androidx/navigation/NavControllerTest.kt
M navigation/runtime/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/NavController.java
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com>
da...@google.com <da...@google.com> #6
We've decided to remove the automatic recreation that was unique to setGraph(int) - it now acts identically to setGraph(NavGraph), so the flow in #2 can be used to ensure that you have custom Navigators added before calling setGraph.
This fix will be available in 1.0.0-alpha07
This fix will be available in 1.0.0-alpha07
Description
Version used: 1.1.0-present
Theme used: NA
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: NA build-time
- Relevant code to trigger the issue: Any kotlin data class in an external module. Building the following project can reproduce it:
In Kotlin, data classes will have a primary constructor and sometimes generated synthetic constructors. ROOM's processor will complain about the presence of the synthetic ones (which are usually visible when reading the class file from an external library), but since it's reading metadata it could use it to find the "primary" constructor to know for sure.
Example:
The solution would be to find that constructor, then match it to the corresponding constructor as seen in the elements API