Fixed
Status Update
Comments
gg...@google.com <gg...@google.com>
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com>
at...@gmail.com <at...@gmail.com> #2
Please attach a sample project that reproduces your issue.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #3
at...@gmail.com <at...@gmail.com> #4
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit bd065925676170c8453321e970d455fac06b8d3d
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jan 28 15:47:16 2019
Add ProGuard rules for DrawerArrowDrawable.setProgress()
setProgress() is called via an ObjectAnimator and
therefore needs to be specifically kept when
obfuscating with ProGuard.
Test: tested in sample project attached to bug
Change-Id: I9c420ce728c5cb887d29df9f856bfd31f5bdbcdf
Fixes: 123449431
M navigation/ui/build.gradle
A navigation/ui/proguard-rules.pro
https://android-review.googlesource.com/887876
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/bd065925676170c8453321e970d455fac06b8d3d
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit bd065925676170c8453321e970d455fac06b8d3d
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Jan 28 15:47:16 2019
Add ProGuard rules for DrawerArrowDrawable.setProgress()
setProgress() is called via an ObjectAnimator and
therefore needs to be specifically kept when
obfuscating with ProGuard.
Test: tested in sample project attached to bug
Change-Id: I9c420ce728c5cb887d29df9f856bfd31f5bdbcdf
Fixes: 123449431
M navigation/ui/build.gradle
A navigation/ui/proguard-rules.pro
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #5
We've added the appropriate ProGuard configuration and it'll be available in the next release.
As a workaround, you can add the following to your ProGuard configuration:
-keepclassmembers class android.support.v7.graphics.drawable.DrawerArrowDrawable {
void setProgress(float);
}
As a workaround, you can add the following to your ProGuard configuration:
-keepclassmembers class android.support.v7.graphics.drawable.DrawerArrowDrawable {
void setProgress(float);
}
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #6
Sure, thanks for the quick fix.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #7
I had to use the androidx version for proguard rules
-keepclassmembers class androidx.appcompat.graphics.drawable.DrawerArrowDrawable {
void setProgress(float);
}
-keepclassmembers class androidx.appcompat.graphics.drawable.DrawerArrowDrawable {
void setProgress(float);
}
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8
Yep, Jetifier will automatically convert ProGuard rules packaged with libraries, but if you're adding the ProGuard files to your own project, you'll need to make sure to use the AndroidX equivalents if your project is using AndroidX.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #9
This issue seems to be back again? ... I'm using v2.2.0-rc02 and have run into the issue. Using the proguard rule below (mentioned in #7 above) to work around the issue seems to fix it.
-keepclassmembers class androidx.appcompat.graphics.drawable.DrawerArrowDrawable {
void setProgress(float);
}
Looking at the commit linked above that fixed the issue originally, it adds a proguard rule to fix the issue for the old support library, but not a rule for the AndroidX equivalent. #8 suggests that Jetifier will handle the AndroidX conversion, but that doesn't seem to be the case? I'm using AndroidX and Jetifier and without the specfic -keep rule above for androidx, my back arrow icon gets removed in release (minified) builds.
-keepclassmembers class androidx.appcompat.graphics.drawable.DrawerArrowDrawable {
void setProgress(float);
}
Looking at the commit linked above that fixed the issue originally, it adds a proguard rule to fix the issue for the old support library, but not a rule for the AndroidX equivalent. #8 suggests that Jetifier will handle the AndroidX conversion, but that doesn't seem to be the case? I'm using AndroidX and Jetifier and without the specfic -keep rule above for androidx, my back arrow icon gets removed in release (minified) builds.
at...@gmail.com <at...@gmail.com> #10
Re #9 - I filed
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #11
Do you have jetifier enabled by adding android.enableJetifier=true
in your gradle.properties file? If so it should work fine. We opened a bug to change the rule over so that enabling jetifier is not required in a future release (
at...@gmail.com <at...@gmail.com> #12
Re #11, I do have jetifier enabled, and still see the regression mentioned in #9
at...@gmail.com <at...@gmail.com> #13
This is what would work if you use a simple bottom sheet layout with a ConstraintLayout as root view as pointed out in comment #3 :
if (parent instanceof DrawerLayout) {
((DrawerLayout) parent).closeDrawer(navigationView);
} else {
BottomSheetBehavior bottomSheetBehavior =
BottomSheetBehavior.from((View) navigationView.getParent().getParent());
if (bottomSheetBehavior != null) {
bottomSheetBehavior.setState(BottomSheetBehavior.STATE_HIDDEN);
}
}
but only
BottomSheetBehavior bottomSheetBehavior =
BottomSheetBehavior.from(navigationView);
would expect, that the navigationView is a direct child of a CoordinatorLayout and would have the app:layout_behavior="com.google.android.material.bottomsheet.BottomSheetBehavior" attribute. That can't work or did I miss something?
if (parent instanceof DrawerLayout) {
((DrawerLayout) parent).closeDrawer(navigationView);
} else {
BottomSheetBehavior bottomSheetBehavior =
BottomSheetBehavior.from((View) navigationView.getParent().getParent());
if (bottomSheetBehavior != null) {
bottomSheetBehavior.setState(BottomSheetBehavior.STATE_HIDDEN);
}
}
but only
BottomSheetBehavior bottomSheetBehavior =
BottomSheetBehavior.from(navigationView);
would expect, that the navigationView is a direct child of a CoordinatorLayout and would have the app:layout_behavior="com.google.android.material.bottomsheet.BottomSheetBehavior" attribute. That can't work or did I miss something?
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #14
Yeah, we should avoid BottomSheetBehavior.from()'s overzealous throwing of exceptions and handle cases like BottomSheetDialogFragment where the NavigationView is a few layers below the CoordinatorLayout.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #15
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 4fb1acaf8ee002979bc161e362c1e83f89195205
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 18 13:38:07 2018
Fix NavigationUI for use with BottomSheetDialogFragment
Replace using BottomSheetBehavior.from() which
throws IllegalArgumentExceptions to a safe
method that searches up the view hierarchy
for a CoordinatorLayout to determine if the
NavigationView is within a bottom sheet.
Test: example added to the integration-tests/testapp
BUG: 112158843
Change-Id: I774991ef1b23085e075e6bac6fa820ee3e001a31
M navigation/integration-tests/testapp/build.gradle
M navigation/integration-tests/testapp/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/testapp/HelpActivity.kt
M navigation/integration-tests/testapp/src/main/res/layout/activity_help.xml
A navigation/integration-tests/testapp/src/main/res/layout/bottom_bar_menu.xml
M navigation/ui/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/ui/NavigationUI.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/760505
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/4fb1acaf8ee002979bc161e362c1e83f89195205
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 4fb1acaf8ee002979bc161e362c1e83f89195205
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 18 13:38:07 2018
Fix NavigationUI for use with BottomSheetDialogFragment
Replace using BottomSheetBehavior.from() which
throws IllegalArgumentExceptions to a safe
method that searches up the view hierarchy
for a CoordinatorLayout to determine if the
NavigationView is within a bottom sheet.
Test: example added to the integration-tests/testapp
BUG: 112158843
Change-Id: I774991ef1b23085e075e6bac6fa820ee3e001a31
M navigation/integration-tests/testapp/build.gradle
M navigation/integration-tests/testapp/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/testapp/HelpActivity.kt
M navigation/integration-tests/testapp/src/main/res/layout/activity_help.xml
A navigation/integration-tests/testapp/src/main/res/layout/bottom_bar_menu.xml
M navigation/ui/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/ui/NavigationUI.java
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #16
Thanks for catching the oversight! The new code should work considerably better for other bottom sheet cases without the IllegalArgumentExceptions :)
Description
The Navigation Component has this very useful function to sync up menu items from a NavigationView with the NavController. It makes sure that the selected item is checked, can close the navigation drawer on selection if a DrawerLayout is used, or set the title of an ActionBar/Toolbar according to the current destination.
With the addition of the bottom app bar in Material Design we've also begun using the bottom navigation drawer (
public class BottomDrawerFragment extends BottomSheetDialogFragment {
@Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container, Bundle savedInstanceState) {
View view = inflater.inflate(R.layout.fragment_bottom_drawer, container, false);
NavigationView navigationView = view.findViewById(R.id.bottom_drawer_navigation);
NavigationUI.setupWithNavController(navigationView, Navigation.findNavController(getActivity(), R.id.nav_host_fragment));
return view;
}
}
This works well, but because NavigationUI currently doesn't dismiss the BottomSheetDialogFragment when a menu item has been selected like it closes the DrawerLayout, the bottom navigation drawer remains open and needs to be dismissed in another way (which comes with additional code overhead and issues).
Since AndroidX is now part of AOSP, I took a look at the implementation and I think that support for this could be added with two lines of code (see '+' characters at beginning of lines below) by doing for the DialogFragment what is already done for the DrawerLayout (excerpt from androidx-master-dev/navigation/ui/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/ui/NavigationUI.java).
public static void setupWithNavController(@NonNull final NavigationView navigationView,
@NonNull final NavController navController) {
navigationView.setNavigationItemSelectedListener(
new NavigationView.OnNavigationItemSelectedListener() {
@Override
public boolean onNavigationItemSelected(@NonNull MenuItem item) {
boolean handled = onNavDestinationSelected(item, navController, true);
if (handled) {
ViewParent parent = navigationView.getParent();
if (parent instanceof DrawerLayout) {
((DrawerLayout) parent).closeDrawer(navigationView);
+ } else if (parent instanceof BottomSheetDialogFragment) {
+ ((DialogFragment) parent).dismiss();
}
}
return handled;
}
});
navController.addOnNavigatedListener(new NavController.OnNavigatedListener() {
@Override
public void onNavigated(@NonNull NavController controller,
@NonNull NavDestination destination) {
Menu menu = navigationView.getMenu();
for (int h = 0, size = menu.size(); h < size; h++) {
MenuItem item = menu.getItem(h);
item.setChecked(matchDestination(destination, item.getItemId()));
}
}
});
}
The most active owner of the Navigation Component is Ian Lake and it he's been adding support for more and more UI components to the NavigationUI class in the past months, so I think he's the person to talk to about this. Assuming this doesn't introduce any issues, he could probably get it done in a couple of minutes.
Alternatively, I could implement this and the accompanying test myself, contribute it and try to get it reviewed.