Fixed
Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #2
ou...@gmail.com <ou...@gmail.com> #3
> We accept pull requests! :)
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it inhttps://android.googlesource.com , and it doesn't seem to be inside https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/support .
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it in
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #4
Room supports immutability (it can use arg constructors) but does not directly support AutoValue. It is in the schedule but not high priority :/. Idk much about its internals at this stage so I'm not sure how we would implement it but should be totally doable.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #5
"It is in the schedule but not high priority" -- completely understandable.
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
sp...@google.com <sp...@google.com> #6
Add autovalue support also means you can easily achieve parcelable by https://github.com/rharter/auto-value-parcel . Please consider support this.
Description
Version used: android.arch.navigation:navigation-ui:1.0.0-alpha05
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: any
I suppose it's no a bug, but just a wrong behavior.
If i have i custom scheme, like "com.example://" - this could not be used and inside framework http(s) will be appended.
NavDeeplink states that there is a scheme pattern, that should detect if there is any scheme before ":", but it fails if there is any dot in scheme. So any scheme that contains dots will fail. Only schemes with "-" are supported by now.
private static final Pattern SCHEME_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("^(\\w+-)*\\w+:");