Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
il...@google.com
ma...@gmail.com
ch...@moqi.co.uk
If the width or height is greater than 8191, left-shifting causes the sign bit to be lost, turning a '1' into a '0', which results in an incorrect width or height.
I agree there's a bug here, but I'm not sure this is quite a precise description of the problem. A quick experiment suggests that the left shift (<<) works fine (if we are just looking at bits), but the right shift (>>) is where the problem is introduced, because >> does "sign extension" in Java - meaning if input value is negative (the MSB of the 32-bit int is 1), then the result will be negative too. This can be fixed by using the unsigned right shift operator (>>>).
You can see this in jshell:
$ jshell
| Welcome to JShell -- Version 22
| For an introduction type: /help intro
jshell> int width = 5
width ==> 5
jshell> int height = 8192
height ==> 8192
jshell> int widthAndHeight = (width << 16) | height
widthAndHeight ==> 335872
jshell> (widthAndHeight << 18) >> 18
$8 ==> -8192
jshell> (widthAndHeight << 18) >>> 18
$9 ==> 8192
That said, I also agree that your change in
il...@google.com
Thanks for your reply. So it it ok to be merged?
ap...@google.com
Branch: androidx-main
commit 59e5677498b92689c2c92801c1f371f24ca7024e
Author: Ian Baker <ibaker@google.com>
Date: Thu Aug 01 16:12:27 2024
Add a test WebP image with a height of 8192px
This exercises the bug reported in
The test is disabled for now. It can be enabled as part of merging the
fix in
This image was generated using imagemagick:
$ convert webp_without_exif.webp \
-resize 6144x8192 \
webp_without_exif_height_8192px.webp
Bug: 342697059
Test: ExifInterfaceTest
Change-Id: Ib014f54fbe8d28579f95d5d2f34e302cdd569fb9
M exifinterface/exifinterface/src/androidTest/java/androidx/exifinterface/media/ExifInterfaceTest.java
A exifinterface/exifinterface/src/androidTest/res/raw/webp_without_exif_height_8192px.webp
Description
android.arch.navigation:navigation-fragment-ktx
android.arch.navigation:navigation-ui-ktx
Version used:
1.0.0-alpha05
Devices/Android versions reproduced on:
-SM-A510F, Android 7.0
-Emulator x86_64 API 28
Sample project:
Description:
Having this structure:
nav_graph.xml
<navigation
android:id="@+id/nav_graph"
app:startDestination="@id/startFragment">
<fragment
android:id="@+id/startFragment"
android:name="com.example.navbug.StartFragment"
android:label="StartFragment"
tools:layout="@layout/fragment_start">
<action
android:id="@+id/action_startFragment_to_nested_nav_graph"
app:destination="@id/nested_nav_graph" />
</fragment>
<include app:graph="@navigation/nested_nav_graph" />
</navigation>
nested_nav_graph.xml
<navigation
android:id="@+id/nested_nav_graph"
app:startDestination="@id/nestedStartFragment">
<fragment
android:id="@+id/nestedStartFragment"
android:name="com.example.navbug.NestedStartFragment"
android:label="NestedStartFragment">
<action
android:id="@+id/action_nestedStartFragment_to_nestedSecondFragment"
app:destination="@id/nestedSecondFragment"
app:popUpTo="@+id/nestedStartFragment"
app:popUpToInclusive="true" />
</fragment>
<fragment
android:id="@+id/nestedSecondFragment"
android:name="com.example.navbug.NestedSecondFragment"
android:label="NestedSecondFragment" />
</navigation>
I want to achieve this navigation pattern:
StartFragment => NestedStartFragment => NestedSecondFragment =(back)=> StartFragment
I'm trying to implement this by setting the action NestedStartFragment=>NestedSecondFragment with the options [popUpTo=NestedStartFragment, popUpToInclusive=true], so that the resulting stack would be:
0. NestedSecondFragment
1. NestedNavGraph
2. StartFragment
3. NavGraph
When navigating from NestedStartFragment to NestedSecondFragment, the following execption occurs:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Navigator androidx.navigation.fragment.FragmentNavigator@ccc9092 reported navigation to unknown destination id com.example.navbug:id/nestedSecondFragment
at androidx.navigation.NavController$2.onNavigatorNavigated(NavController.java:142)
at androidx.navigation.Navigator.dispatchOnNavigatorNavigated(Navigator.java:217)
at androidx.navigation.fragment.FragmentNavigator.navigate(FragmentNavigator.java:207)
at androidx.navigation.fragment.FragmentNavigator.navigate(FragmentNavigator.java:45)
at androidx.navigation.NavDestination.navigate(NavDestination.java:407)
at androidx.navigation.NavController.navigate(NavController.java:683)
at androidx.navigation.NavController.navigate(NavController.java:630)
at androidx.navigation.NavController.navigate(NavController.java:618)
at com.example.navbug.NestedStartFragment$onViewCreated$1.onClick(Fragments.kt:31)
at android.view.View.performClick(View.java:6597)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal(View.java:6574)
at android.view.View.access$3100(View.java:778)
at android.view.View$PerformClick.run(View.java:25885)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:873)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:193)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:6669)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:493)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:858)
Right before the navigation, the stack is:
0. NestedStartFragment
1. NestedNavGraph
2. StartFragment
3. NavGraph
When NestedStartFragment is popped on my request, NestedNavGraph is also popped because
"// We never want to leave NavGraphs on the top of the stack" (from NavController.onNavigatorNavigated)
with the effect that eventually the requested destination NestedSecondFragment is pruned from the graph and cannot be reached anymore.
Unless I'm doing something wrong, it seems that NavGraph automatic popping should be avoided if the final destination actually belongs to it.