Fixed
Status Update
Comments
yb...@google.com <yb...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #2
da...@google.com <da...@google.com> #3
> We accept pull requests! :)
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it inhttps://android.googlesource.com , and it doesn't seem to be inside https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/support .
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it in
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
ta...@gmail.com <ta...@gmail.com> #4
Room supports immutability (it can use arg constructors) but does not directly support AutoValue. It is in the schedule but not high priority :/. Idk much about its internals at this stage so I'm not sure how we would implement it but should be totally doable.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #5
"It is in the schedule but not high priority" -- completely understandable.
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #6
Add autovalue support also means you can easily achieve parcelable by https://github.com/rharter/auto-value-parcel . Please consider support this.
Description
Version used: 2.0.0
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: N / A
@Dao
interface Foo {
@Query("SELECT * FROM bar")
fun getAll(): List<Bar>
@Transaction
fun getTransactionAll(): List<Bar> {
return getAll()
}
}
It generates
Foo.DefaultImpls.getTransactionAll(this, )
which cause the error (illegal start of expression) because of the extra comma.