Fixed
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
ya...@google.com
ap...@google.com
One more detail here.
The body of navigateUp() method of NavController class (1.0.0-rc01) looks like this:
if (mBackStack.size() == 1) {
// If there's only one entry, then we've deep linked into a specific destination
// on another task so we need to find the parent and start our task from there
...
} else {
return popBackStack();
}
If I put a breakpoint on the very first line of that code and invoke this method anyhow, I can see that the size of mBackStack is actually 2 (with both root and child fragments).
So, the code doesn't consider the current case a deeplink case, but as a regular opening of the child destination.
The body of navigateUp() method of NavController class (1.0.0-rc01) looks like this:
if (mBackStack.size() == 1) {
// If there's only one entry, then we've deep linked into a specific destination
// on another task so we need to find the parent and start our task from there
...
} else {
return popBackStack();
}
If I put a breakpoint on the very first line of that code and invoke this method anyhow, I can see that the size of mBackStack is actually 2 (with both root and child fragments).
So, the code doesn't consider the current case a deeplink case, but as a regular opening of the child destination.
Description
I don't see why we cannot support it since from a relation's perspective, it is like an entity.
This is quite critical as it allows extending scope of relationships.