Fixed
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
su...@google.com
ch...@gmail.com
> We accept pull requests! :)
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it inhttps://android.googlesource.com , and it doesn't seem to be inside https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/support .
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it in
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
Room supports immutability (it can use arg constructors) but does not directly support AutoValue. It is in the schedule but not high priority :/. Idk much about its internals at this stage so I'm not sure how we would implement it but should be totally doable.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
ro...@gmail.com
"It is in the schedule but not high priority" -- completely understandable.
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
su...@google.com
Add autovalue support also means you can easily achieve parcelable by https://github.com/rharter/auto-value-parcel . Please consider support this.
su...@google.com
AutoValue is really a handy way to ensure data integrity.
ch...@instacart.com
Please add AutoValue support. AutoValue is a Google library with really good benefits such as toString() , hashCode() , AutoValue.Builder , checks at creation time if @NonNull values are null, etc.
Description
Version used: 1.0.0-alpha12
After upgrading to alpha12, all of my Workers written in Kotlin (and CoroutineWorkers, FWIW), complain about the 'Result' return value with an error that says: "One type argument expected for class Result<out T>"
It appears that the Kotlin standard library contains a public inline Result class already:
The Kotlin Result class is automatically available in every file, so Android Studio (3.2.1) doesn't offer to import the androidx.work.Result class, causing the error since it assumes you want to use the already available kotlin Result.
There were two workarounds, neither very friendly:
1) Use the fully qualified androidx.work.Result
2) Manually adding the androidx.work.Result import statement
Note that:
- Using the fully qualified name, then using the Android Studio option to add import did not work
- Removing the doWork method entirely and using Android Studio's quick fix to implement the method did add an import to androidx.work.Result, so new classes would avoid running into this issue.