Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
lp...@google.com
So there does seem to be a bug in Navigation that causes this to fail.
When it navigates with popUpTo and removes SecondFragment, that removal in fragment is set for a frame later and before it is actually removed the navigate call in the onViewCreated of SecondFragment enqueues another call to add it back. But we still need to destroy SecondDetailFragment which ends up marking the NavBackStackEntry associated with SecondFragment as complete before navigation has received the call from the fragment that it has been added back. So by the time it hits this check, the SecondFragment is in the correct state, but Navigation has no way of referencing it so it assumes that it is not associated with an entry.
But this is not the way this type of situation should be implemented. Instead of having the destinations as part of the NavGraph, they should:
- be managed by the childFragmentManager of
SecondFragment. So instead of going back toSecondFragmentjust to go somewhere else, each of the fragments take the entire content ofSecondFragmentand are swapped out. - for some sort of a/b testing, set different graphs in the Activity. The graphs would keep the same
SecondFragmentid, but swap out the names and then you choose the correct graph based on the condition.
ma...@gmail.com
- Have
SecondFragmentas part of your graph and then inside ofSecondFragmentcall thechildFragmentManagerandreplacewith the fragment you actually want to show, whether that isSecondTypeOneorSecondTypeTwo. - Create different graphs and follow along with the
docs
jb...@google.com
shardViewModel.onGetTypeSecond.observe(viewLifecycleOwner) { isType1 ->
if (isType1) {
val graph = findNavController().graph
val carInstallmentNavGraph =
graph.findNode(R.id.nav_second) as NavGraph
carInstallmentNavGraph.setStartDestination(R.id.secondTypeOneFragment)
findNavController().navigate(SecondFragmentDirections.actionSecondFragmentToSecondTypeOneFragment())
} else {
val graph = findNavController().graph
val carInstallmentNavGraph =
graph.findNode(R.id.nav_second) as NavGraph
carInstallmentNavGraph.setStartDestination(R.id.secondTypeTwoFragment)
findNavController().navigate(SecondFragmentDirections.actionSecondFragmentToSecondTypeTwoFragment())
}
}
and removed app:popUpTo="@id/secondFragment" and app:popUpToInclusive="true"
<fragment
android:id="@+id/secondFragment"
android:name="com.example.navigationdeeplink.SecondFragment"
android:label="fragment_second"
tools:layout="@layout/fragment_second" >
<action
android:id="@+id/action_secondFragment_to_secondTypeOneFragment"
app:destination="@id/secondTypeOneFragment" />
<action
android:id="@+id/action_secondFragment_to_secondTypeTwoFragment"
app:destination="@id/secondTypeTwoFragment"
app:popUpTo="@id/secondFragment" />
</fragment>
ma...@gmail.com
Is there a planned fix for this issue? We've been stuck on Navigation 2.5.3 for some time due to issues in 2.6.x and now this issue, and the suggested workaround of restructuring our navigation graph is a pretty big lift. If that's the only recommended path it would be helpful to know so we can try to plan for that work, otherwise we'd want to just wait for the fix that doesn't require restructuring.
Description
PreferenceFragmentCompat sets this adapter (PreferenceGroupAdapter), which implicitly registers an observer. PreferenceFragmentCompat never sets the adapter to null when the view is destroyed, so the observer keeps references to the RecyclerView and doesn't get gc'ed.
I've worked around this by explicitly setting the adapter to null in an override of onDestroyView, but since my component doesn't explicitly have ownership of the list handling, I'd argue that PreferenceFragmentCompat should do this cleanup.
It would be solved by setting the RecyclerView adapter to null in the fragment's onDestroyView.
Here's a memory dump.