Workers executed when constraint is met crashing on Android 4.4-5.1 (WorkManager scheduling instead of JobService) [129226383]

Fixed

Bug

Status Update

No update yet.

Description

jo...@gmail.com

created issue #1

Mar 25, 2019 09:29AM

Component used: androidx.work:work-runtime
Version used: 2.0.0
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: reported on Android 5.0/5.1 (Play Console) / Android 4.4.2/4.4.4/5.0-5.1.1 (Firebase Crashlytics). Multiple devices from various manufacturers, including Samsung, Lenovo, LG, Motorola, HTC, Sony and Asus.

After updating our app from android.arch.work:work-runtime:1.0.0-rc02 to androidx.work:work-runtime:2.0.0, we're seeing crashes when WorkManager starts a job for a significant amount of our users, which doesn't make much sense because the code should be similar to the previous version but it is still a problem.
Unfortunately, we haven't been able to replicate the issue on our 4.4.2 test device. Because the issue is limited to Android versions where JobService isn't used (and the stack trace, see below), it seems like the issue is caused by WorkManager's scheduling and not the job itself.

The worker is set up by a periodic request:

Constraints workerConstraints = new Constraints.Builder().setRequiredNetworkType(NetworkType.CONNECTED).build();
PeriodicWorkRequest userUpdateWorker = new PeriodicWorkRequest.Builder(UserUpdateWorker.class, 8, TimeUnit.HOURS)
.addTag(UserUpdateWorker.class.getName())
.setConstraints(workerConstraints)
.build();
WorkManager.getInstance().enqueue(userUpdateWorker);

Stack trace from the Crashlytics/Play Console crash reports:

Fatal Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error receiving broadcast Intent { act=android.net.conn.CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE flg=0x4000010 (has extras) } in androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.NetworkStateTracker$NetworkStateBroadcastReceiver@42849958
at android.app.LoadedApk$ReceiverDispatcher$Args.run (LoadedApk.java:941)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:145)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:6117)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (ZygoteInit.java:1399)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1194)
Caused by java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask@2ac263d0 rejected from java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor@320e0fc9[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$AbortPolicy.rejectedExecution (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:2011)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.reject (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:793)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.delayedExecute (ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:298)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.schedule (ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:503)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$DelegatedScheduledExecutorService.schedule (Executors.java:644)
at androidx.work.impl.background.systemalarm.WorkTimer.startTimer (WorkTimer.java:82)
at androidx.work.impl.background.systemalarm.DelayMetCommandHandler.onAllConstraintsMet (DelayMetCommandHandler.java:100)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.WorkConstraintsTracker.onConstraintMet (WorkConstraintsTracker.java:150)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.controllers.ConstraintController.updateCallback (ConstraintController.java:134)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.controllers.ConstraintController.onConstraintChanged (ConstraintController.java:141)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.ConstraintTracker.setState (ConstraintTracker.java:103)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.NetworkStateTracker$NetworkStateBroadcastReceiver.onReceive (NetworkStateTracker.java:170)
at android.app.LoadedApk$ReceiverDispatcher$Args.run (LoadedApk.java:931)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:145)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:6117)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (ZygoteInit.java:1399)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1194)

Comments

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #2Mar 25, 2019 09:48AM

Please include a sample project that reproduces your issue.

je...@gmail.com <je...@gmail.com> #3Mar 25, 2019 03:26PM

Sample project attached. Just add to plain project this dependencies allow to reproduce.

def emoji2_version = "1.1.0-beta01"
implementation "androidx.emoji2:emoji2:$emoji2_version"

def lifecycle_version = "2.5.0-alpha01"
implementation "androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-process:$lifecycle_version"

ra...@google.com <ra...@google.com> Mar 25, 2019 09:05PM

Assigned to ra...@google.com.

ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #4Mar 26, 2019 12:05AM

Marked as fixed.

The reason may be related to this change, which check itself before it is initialized. Use 2.4.0 of lifecycle-process as workaround.

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #5Mar 26, 2019 05:53AM

Yes, this is due to this change, as well as the fact that EmojiCompatInitializer has a ProcessLifecycleInitializer as a dependency and also re-calls it, but in manual mode.

ra...@google.com <ra...@google.com> #6Mar 26, 2019 05:25PM

ProcessLifecycleInitializer is expected to already be initialized (via the manifest provider for App Startup) by the time that code runs - App Startup shouldn't be calling create if that component has already been initialized, hence you shouldn't get any exception. We'll take a look on where things are breaking down though.

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #7Apr 1, 2019 07:20PM

Thanks for the answer.

As I understand EmojiCompatInitializer has ProcessLifecycleInitializer as a dependency. That is mean, the ProcessLifecycleInitializer must be executed before the EmojiCompatInitializer, which in its create method calls the delayUntilFirstResume method, which in turn calls the ProcessLifecycleInitializer via appInitializer.initializeComponent(ProcessLifecycleInitializer.class)

Maybe it would be more correct to create a bug in emoji-2, but let it be here.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #8Apr 1, 2019 07:32PM

This issue isn't related to emoji2, it could be reproduced easily with the lifecycle-process (2.4.0 -> 2.5.0-alpha01) only.

dr...@gmail.com <dr...@gmail.com> #9Apr 6, 2019 09:13AM

Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main

commit 97993ad954cb98211ef52b6e26c7877dbdeeec1c
Author: Jeremy Woods <jbwoods@google.com>
Date: Tue Feb 01 17:06:11 2022

Bump lifecycle process start-up dependency to 1.1.1

Bumping the startup dependency to include aosp/1855769.

RelNote: "Updated `lifecycle-process` to depend on [Startup 1.1.1](/jetpack/androidx/releases/startup#1.1.1) to ensure that fixes that prevent `ProcessLifecycleInitializer` from throwing a `StartupException` are available by default."
Bug: 216490724
Test: tested in sample app

Change-Id: Ib01dfbba1d63aa03e43e09ee8886cc76e1050e1b

M lifecycle/lifecycle-process/build.gradle

https://android-review.googlesource.com/1964554

li...@gmail.com <li...@gmail.com> #10May 17, 2019 02:14AM

This has been fixed internally and will be released in the Lifecycle 2.5.0-alpha02 release.

ra...@google.com <ra...@google.com> #11May 17, 2019 06:03PM

When will start-up 1.1.1 release?

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #12Jun 10, 2019 01:18PM

It should be out before the end of the week.

ra...@google.com <ra...@google.com> #13Jun 10, 2019 04:05PM

This would still happen in some rare conditions. So we have another fix for it in 2.1.0-alpha03.

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #14Feb 25, 2020 12:36PM

I'm also getting same crash in Google Play console only for android-sdk 4.4 to 5.2
used work manager version = '2.3.0'
implementation "androidx.work:work-runtime:2.3.0"

This is Top most crash in my App Account.

Message last modified on Feb 25, 2020 12:39PM

mi...@charter.com <mi...@charter.com> #15Apr 1, 2020 11:28PM

We have noticed a huge surge in this issue after migrating to Android Studio 3.6 in our latest release (updated classpath in root build.gradle to "com.android.tools.build:gradle:3.6.x" -- we were previously on 3.4.2).

Doing so, forced our work manager to version up to 2.0.0, even though we are still declaring 1.x in our dependencies (Gradle automatically chooses the latest version to resolve dependency version conflicts).
This introduced the same crash and logs mentioned in earlier comments on this issue tracker ticket.

This crash bug was likely not fixed until 2.2.0-rc1:

https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/work#2.2.0-rc01

So our attempted solution was to adopt the latest stable version of work manager (2.3.4 according to the documentation). However, with this new gradle build tools version, the dependency appears to be locked to 2.0.0 no matter what we try. Using "strictly" or "force" as described in the gradle documentation seems to have to no effect. And using exclude does not make much sense.

https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/dependency_downgrade_and_exclude.html

When using Gradle's dependency insight, we can see that for some reason after the migration, the dependency now has a new selection reason.
"Selected by rule : ENABLE_JETIFIER is enabled".

So at this point, it seems our options appear to be:
- Waiting for fix from Google or Gradle,
- Disabling jetifier and refactoring everything in order to avoid using AndroidX components.
- Revert our migration to Android Studio 3.6
- Remove work manager dependency altogether for the OS versions / device models affected

Hopefully this information helps, and hopefully it gets resolved soon!

Message last modified on Apr 2, 2020 03:11PM

il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #16Apr 1, 2020 11:37PM

Re #15 - make sure you're using androidx.work and not the android.arch.work group ID in your dependency (using android.arch.work will cause the behavior you're seeing) as per the documentation.

mi...@charter.com <mi...@charter.com> #17Apr 2, 2020 03:18PM

My goodness, thank you so much for responding so quickly! I must have looked over those code snippets a dozen times and did not realize this change.
Yes, it works when migrating to the androidX group id. Perhaps the AndroidX migration guide needs to add this dependency as well:

https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/migrate/artifact-mappings