Fixed
Status Update
Comments
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #3
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit 428f0ec685ff80035c0511c0cdb12b9770b6159c
Author: Maxim Savoskin <maximsavoskin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Mar 29 13:20:52 2021
[GH] [Lifecycle] [Lint] fixes b/183696616 : KtCallExpression is not always the first in the list
## Proposed Changes
KtCallExpression is not always the first in the list. In this case, it is KtModifierList.
## Testing
Test: ./gradlew test lint buildOnServer
## Issues Fixed
Fixes:https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/183696616
This is an imported pull request fromhttps://github.com/androidx/androidx/pull/147 .
Resolves #147
Github-Pr-Head-Sha: 3c2693e2f4cceb367c9c169749d1391a9da2740f
GitOrigin-RevId: a6440720029b1c0c702207f1393d3b01180691b8
Change-Id: I9b4383329b9ece85e3bffa4a9bf8e8a3f0c3d84a
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-core-ktx-lint/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/lint/NonNullableMutableLiveDataDetector.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-core-ktx-lint/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/lint/NonNullableMutableLiveDataDetectorTest.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1656820
Branch: androidx-main
commit 428f0ec685ff80035c0511c0cdb12b9770b6159c
Author: Maxim Savoskin <maximsavoskin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Mar 29 13:20:52 2021
[GH] [Lifecycle] [Lint] fixes
## Proposed Changes
KtCallExpression is not always the first in the list. In this case, it is KtModifierList.
## Testing
Test: ./gradlew test lint buildOnServer
## Issues Fixed
Fixes:
This is an imported pull request from
Resolves #147
Github-Pr-Head-Sha: 3c2693e2f4cceb367c9c169749d1391a9da2740f
GitOrigin-RevId: a6440720029b1c0c702207f1393d3b01180691b8
Change-Id: I9b4383329b9ece85e3bffa4a9bf8e8a3f0c3d84a
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-core-ktx-lint/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/lint/NonNullableMutableLiveDataDetector.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-core-ktx-lint/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/lint/NonNullableMutableLiveDataDetectorTest.kt
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com>
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #4
Will you guys be releasing a hot fix 2.3.2 for this?
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #5
Any updates about when this is going live?
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #6
Hi, I hate to keep posting same comments, but are there any plans to release this fix? It's blocking us from updating to fragment 1.3.2+.
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #7
D
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #8
How do you update components that are viewed through the chrome.url page of they all indicate that they are not up to date
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #9
Also my phone was in the hands of a skilled IT individual, how can I verify what, if any, modifications took place. I cannot enter recovery mode on my device....
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #10
I'd rather like to keep the "addToBackStack(..)" to rewind through fragment transactions. Will definitely look further into it also from the above mentioned logs.
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #11
Thanks for clarifying, I will investigate further.
Following on the logs above, I suspect that each instance of FragmentStateAdapter gets access to that one BaseFragment in FragmentStateAdapter::restoreState (restore state called on each stack entry).
Making sure each ViewPagerFragment instance only gets access to its own state (so the state is not shared between them) should eliminate this issue.
Not sure where the problem lies yet, whether in ViewPager2's interaction with the state saving stack, or in the sample app, so continuing to investigate.
Following on the logs above, I suspect that each instance of FragmentStateAdapter gets access to that one BaseFragment in FragmentStateAdapter::restoreState (restore state called on each stack entry).
Making sure each ViewPagerFragment instance only gets access to its own state (so the state is not shared between them) should eliminate this issue.
Not sure where the problem lies yet, whether in ViewPager2's interaction with the state saving stack, or in the sample app, so continuing to investigate.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #12
Yeah.. I have no clue what's going on, spending too much time debugging. I am planning to attach LifecycleObserver to my ViewHolder's so they act like Fragments.
From the evidence above, I am pretty sure it should not affect ViewHolder pattern but never know. Would love to know what was happening though if you come across a solution.
From the evidence above, I am pretty sure it should not affect ViewHolder pattern but never know. Would love to know what was happening though if you come across a solution.
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com>
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #13
Looks like the following is happening in the sample:
- the same instance of ViewPagerFragment is being used for various back-stack entries
- multiple instances of FragmentStateAdapter are being created at each ViewPagerFragment view inflation, and each has their post-grace-period gcFragments() scheduled
- the same page Fragment instance reference is passed to all FragmentStateAdapter instances via restoreState, but can only be bound to one ViewHolder (the current visible one)
- once grace-period ends in non-visible FragmentStateAdapter instances, they see nothing is bound to their ViewHolders and garbage-collect the page Fragment
I will look further into the correct solution, potentially cancelling gcFragments() if a FragmentStateAdapter gets detached from a ViewPager2 (e.g. at ViewPagerFragment view destruction).
This would require a code, change, though, so for now, you can probably work around this by not re-using ViewPagerFragment instances, but creating a new one each time you add it to the stack. There might be a need for passing relevant state, e.g. current page.
Raw debugging notes below in case helpful. I reproduced the issue by switching multiple times between buttons 1 and 2.
***
# how many adapter instances exist
️$ cat ff2 | grep -E "FragmentStateAdapter@[^\}]+" -o | sort -u
FragmentStateAdapter@5,446
FragmentStateAdapter@5,474
FragmentStateAdapter@5,484
# how many adapter instances get their state restored
️$ cat ff2 | grep restoreState | grep -E "FragmentStateAdapter@[^\}]+" -o | sort -u
FragmentStateAdapter@5,474
FragmentStateAdapter@5,484
# where are Fragment pages created
️$ cat ff2 | grep createFragment -C1
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
Breakpoint reached at com.test.myapplication.VPAdapter.createFragment(ViewPagerFragment.kt:161)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:252)
# confirming that instance 446 is the only adapter creating the views; others are getting it from previously restored state
# for reference, FragmentStateAdapter.java:248 = "if (!mFragments.containsKey(itemId)) {"
# for reference, FragmentStateAdapter.java:252 = "mFragments.put(itemId, newFragment);"
️$ cat ff2 | grep ensureFragment | sort
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:252)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,474}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,484}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
# where is the state with a page Fragment reference coming from
Breakpoint reached
at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.restoreState(FragmentStateAdapter.java:515)
at androidx.viewpager2.widget.ViewPager2.restorePendingState(ViewPager2.java:337)
at androidx.viewpager2.widget.ViewPager2.dispatchRestoreInstanceState(ViewPager2.java:362)
at android.view.View.restoreHierarchyState(View.java:17684)
at androidx.fragment.app.Fragment.restoreViewState(Fragment.java:539)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.moveToState(FragmentManagerImpl.java:907)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.moveFragmentToExpectedState(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1238)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.moveToState(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1303)
at androidx.fragment.app.BackStackRecord.executeOps(BackStackRecord.java:439)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.executeOps(FragmentManagerImpl.java:2076)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.executeOpsTogether(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1866)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.removeRedundantOperationsAndExecute(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1821)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.execPendingActions(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1727)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl$2.run(FragmentManagerImpl.java:150)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:790)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:164)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:6494)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:-1)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:438)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:807)
# how many Fragment instances go through restoreViewState
️$ cat ff4 | grep "restoreViewState. fragment="
restoreViewState: fragment=ViewPagerFragment{d4490de (a6cfe7d3-5376-4015-8357-2408442116ee) id=0x7f070076 Frag1}
restoreViewState: fragment=BaseFragment{de52066 (f5afa133-40d7-45c1-8193-6ce2d4cb5489) f0}
restoreViewState: fragment=BaseFragment{de52066 (f5afa133-40d7-45c1-8193-6ce2d4cb5489) f0}
restoreViewState: fragment=ViewPagerFragment{d4490de (a6cfe7d3-5376-4015-8357-2408442116ee) id=0x7f070076 Frag1}
restoreViewState: fragment=BaseFragment{de52066 (f5afa133-40d7-45c1-8193-6ce2d4cb5489) f0}
restoreViewState: fragment=ViewPagerFragment{d4490de (a6cfe7d3-5376-4015-8357-2408442116ee) id=0x7f070076 Frag1}
# where are ViewPagerFragment instances created in the sample
```
var fragment: Fragment? = supportFragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("Frag$fragmentToOpen")
if(fragment == null) {
fragment = when(fragmentToOpen) {
1 -> ViewPagerFragment()
2 -> BlankFragment()
else -> throw IllegalArgumentException()
}
}
```
- the same instance of ViewPagerFragment is being used for various back-stack entries
- multiple instances of FragmentStateAdapter are being created at each ViewPagerFragment view inflation, and each has their post-grace-period gcFragments() scheduled
- the same page Fragment instance reference is passed to all FragmentStateAdapter instances via restoreState, but can only be bound to one ViewHolder (the current visible one)
- once grace-period ends in non-visible FragmentStateAdapter instances, they see nothing is bound to their ViewHolders and garbage-collect the page Fragment
I will look further into the correct solution, potentially cancelling gcFragments() if a FragmentStateAdapter gets detached from a ViewPager2 (e.g. at ViewPagerFragment view destruction).
This would require a code, change, though, so for now, you can probably work around this by not re-using ViewPagerFragment instances, but creating a new one each time you add it to the stack. There might be a need for passing relevant state, e.g. current page.
Raw debugging notes below in case helpful. I reproduced the issue by switching multiple times between buttons 1 and 2.
***
# how many adapter instances exist
️$ cat ff2 | grep -E "FragmentStateAdapter@[^\}]+" -o | sort -u
FragmentStateAdapter@5,446
FragmentStateAdapter@5,474
FragmentStateAdapter@5,484
# how many adapter instances get their state restored
️$ cat ff2 | grep restoreState | grep -E "FragmentStateAdapter@[^\}]+" -o | sort -u
FragmentStateAdapter@5,474
FragmentStateAdapter@5,484
# where are Fragment pages created
️$ cat ff2 | grep createFragment -C1
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
Breakpoint reached at com.test.myapplication.VPAdapter.createFragment(ViewPagerFragment.kt:161)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:252)
# confirming that instance 446 is the only adapter creating the views; others are getting it from previously restored state
# for reference, FragmentStateAdapter.java:248 = "if (!mFragments.containsKey(itemId)) {"
# for reference, FragmentStateAdapter.java:252 = "mFragments.put(itemId, newFragment);"
️$ cat ff2 | grep ensureFragment | sort
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,446}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:252)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,474}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
{androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter@5,484}.mFragments will be accessed at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.ensureFragment(FragmentStateAdapter.java:248)
# where is the state with a page Fragment reference coming from
Breakpoint reached
at androidx.viewpager2.adapter.FragmentStateAdapter.restoreState(FragmentStateAdapter.java:515)
at androidx.viewpager2.widget.ViewPager2.restorePendingState(ViewPager2.java:337)
at androidx.viewpager2.widget.ViewPager2.dispatchRestoreInstanceState(ViewPager2.java:362)
at android.view.View.restoreHierarchyState(View.java:17684)
at androidx.fragment.app.Fragment.restoreViewState(Fragment.java:539)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.moveToState(FragmentManagerImpl.java:907)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.moveFragmentToExpectedState(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1238)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.moveToState(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1303)
at androidx.fragment.app.BackStackRecord.executeOps(BackStackRecord.java:439)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.executeOps(FragmentManagerImpl.java:2076)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.executeOpsTogether(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1866)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.removeRedundantOperationsAndExecute(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1821)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl.execPendingActions(FragmentManagerImpl.java:1727)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManagerImpl$2.run(FragmentManagerImpl.java:150)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:790)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:164)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:6494)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:-1)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:438)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:807)
# how many Fragment instances go through restoreViewState
️$ cat ff4 | grep "restoreViewState. fragment="
restoreViewState: fragment=ViewPagerFragment{d4490de (a6cfe7d3-5376-4015-8357-2408442116ee) id=0x7f070076 Frag1}
restoreViewState: fragment=BaseFragment{de52066 (f5afa133-40d7-45c1-8193-6ce2d4cb5489) f0}
restoreViewState: fragment=BaseFragment{de52066 (f5afa133-40d7-45c1-8193-6ce2d4cb5489) f0}
restoreViewState: fragment=ViewPagerFragment{d4490de (a6cfe7d3-5376-4015-8357-2408442116ee) id=0x7f070076 Frag1}
restoreViewState: fragment=BaseFragment{de52066 (f5afa133-40d7-45c1-8193-6ce2d4cb5489) f0}
restoreViewState: fragment=ViewPagerFragment{d4490de (a6cfe7d3-5376-4015-8357-2408442116ee) id=0x7f070076 Frag1}
# where are ViewPagerFragment instances created in the sample
```
var fragment: Fragment? = supportFragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("Frag$fragmentToOpen")
if(fragment == null) {
fragment = when(fragmentToOpen) {
1 -> ViewPagerFragment()
2 -> BlankFragment()
else -> throw IllegalArgumentException()
}
}
```
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #14
Thanks for the suggestion above, creating a new Fragment every time definitely fixes the problem albeit some very ugly code implementation and hacks I had to write to do some state saving in my code (since ViewModels are attached to a specific Fragment instance), my subsequent fragments also need to do some ugly state saving (playing media).
Looking forward to erasing all of this ugly code on next update!
Looking forward to erasing all of this ugly code on next update!
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #15
For anybody who has the same exact problem, page state saving works for me in the following manner:
binding.gamePagerRoot.apply {
// Set the Adapter for our Fragment
adapter = gamePagerAdapter
// Do not allow user touch for this ViewPager2 to affect its scroll, should only be scrolled programmatically
isUserInputEnabled = false
// Set the Page Transformation
setPageTransformer(genStackedPageTransformer2())
// Listen to page change calbacks
registerOnPageChangeCallback(onPageChangeCallback)
// Customize the RecyclerView child
val recyclerView = getChildAt(0) as RecyclerView
// Remove the overscroll shaddow
recyclerView.overScrollMode = RecyclerView.OVER_SCROLL_NEVER
// Allow nested scrolling
recyclerView.isNestedScrollingEnabled = true
// If we are on a different page as specified by our ViewModel, make sure to scroll to the page instantly (no animation)
if(gamePagerVM?.gamePageIds?.size ?: 1 > 1) {
recyclerView.viewTreeObserver.addOnGlobalLayoutListener(object: ViewTreeObserver.OnGlobalLayoutListener{
override fun onGlobalLayout() {
if(recyclerView.childCount >= gamePagerVM?.currPage ?: 0) {
viewTreeObserver.removeOnGlobalLayoutListener(this)
// If the current page is not 0, set the current page
setCurrentItem(gamePagerVM?.currPage ?: 0, false)
}
}
})
}
}
binding.gamePagerRoot.apply {
// Set the Adapter for our Fragment
adapter = gamePagerAdapter
// Do not allow user touch for this ViewPager2 to affect its scroll, should only be scrolled programmatically
isUserInputEnabled = false
// Set the Page Transformation
setPageTransformer(genStackedPageTransformer2())
// Listen to page change calbacks
registerOnPageChangeCallback(onPageChangeCallback)
// Customize the RecyclerView child
val recyclerView = getChildAt(0) as RecyclerView
// Remove the overscroll shaddow
recyclerView.overScrollMode = RecyclerView.OVER_SCROLL_NEVER
// Allow nested scrolling
recyclerView.isNestedScrollingEnabled = true
// If we are on a different page as specified by our ViewModel, make sure to scroll to the page instantly (no animation)
if(gamePagerVM?.gamePageIds?.size ?: 1 > 1) {
recyclerView.viewTreeObserver.addOnGlobalLayoutListener(object: ViewTreeObserver.OnGlobalLayoutListener{
override fun onGlobalLayout() {
if(recyclerView.childCount >= gamePagerVM?.currPage ?: 0) {
viewTreeObserver.removeOnGlobalLayoutListener(this)
// If the current page is not 0, set the current page
setCurrentItem(gamePagerVM?.currPage ?: 0, false)
}
}
})
}
}
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #16
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 7166ba571d594baa9016e02c3b5fe967da0b8ec0
Author: Jakub Gielzak <jgielzak@google.com>
Date: Tue Aug 27 16:20:54 2019
Fix for FragmentStateAdapter#gcFragments()
Fix for an issue with FragmentStateAdapter garbage collection mechanism.
The bug manifested itself in the following scenario:
- ViewPager2 host Fragment view recreated 3+ times in a window < 10s,
- Host Fragment instances added to the back stack,
- ViewPager2 adapter set to null in onViewDestoyed (too late as view
state already saved, but affecting PageFragment book-keeping).
The fix adds another criteria to gcFragments() in case a
PageFragment instance gets taken over by a later created instance of
FragmentStateAdapter.
Bug: 139095195
Test: ./gradlew viewpager2:connectedCheck
Change-Id: If42bc4e65e8fe52cc0dcd9bbf67a0c55d3c535b1
A viewpager2/src/androidTest/java/androidx/viewpager2/widget/HostFragmentBackStackTest.kt
M viewpager2/src/main/java/androidx/viewpager2/adapter/FragmentStateAdapter.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1108545
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/7166ba571d594baa9016e02c3b5fe967da0b8ec0
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 7166ba571d594baa9016e02c3b5fe967da0b8ec0
Author: Jakub Gielzak <jgielzak@google.com>
Date: Tue Aug 27 16:20:54 2019
Fix for FragmentStateAdapter#gcFragments()
Fix for an issue with FragmentStateAdapter garbage collection mechanism.
The bug manifested itself in the following scenario:
- ViewPager2 host Fragment view recreated 3+ times in a window < 10s,
- Host Fragment instances added to the back stack,
- ViewPager2 adapter set to null in onViewDestoyed (too late as view
state already saved, but affecting PageFragment book-keeping).
The fix adds another criteria to gcFragments() in case a
PageFragment instance gets taken over by a later created instance of
FragmentStateAdapter.
Bug: 139095195
Test: ./gradlew viewpager2:connectedCheck
Change-Id: If42bc4e65e8fe52cc0dcd9bbf67a0c55d3c535b1
A viewpager2/src/androidTest/java/androidx/viewpager2/widget/HostFragmentBackStackTest.kt
M viewpager2/src/main/java/androidx/viewpager2/adapter/FragmentStateAdapter.java
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #17
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 39daf73f75d04b1ba52b007781355595430f8dab
Author: Jakub Gielzak <jgielzak@google.com>
Date: Tue Aug 27 16:20:16 2019
Made test FragmentAdapter more flexible.
Needed for the next CL.
Bug: 139095195
Test: ./gradlew viewpager2:connectedCheck
Change-Id: I3aa4b8a131d3d7bca248f94641c5ee643c6f1819
M viewpager2/src/androidTest/java/androidx/viewpager2/widget/BaseTest.kt
M viewpager2/src/androidTest/java/androidx/viewpager2/widget/swipe/FragmentAdapter.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1108544
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/39daf73f75d04b1ba52b007781355595430f8dab
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 39daf73f75d04b1ba52b007781355595430f8dab
Author: Jakub Gielzak <jgielzak@google.com>
Date: Tue Aug 27 16:20:16 2019
Made test FragmentAdapter more flexible.
Needed for the next CL.
Bug: 139095195
Test: ./gradlew viewpager2:connectedCheck
Change-Id: I3aa4b8a131d3d7bca248f94641c5ee643c6f1819
M viewpager2/src/androidTest/java/androidx/viewpager2/widget/BaseTest.kt
M viewpager2/src/androidTest/java/androidx/viewpager2/widget/swipe/FragmentAdapter.kt
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com> #18
beta04 with a fix for this was released today
Description
Creating Sample app to verify, but in case this is already a known issue