Fixed
Status Update
Comments
m4...@gmail.com <m4...@gmail.com> #2
We have same issue.
Version used: WorkManager 2.1.0-alpha01
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: mostly Android 5 & 6
Fatal Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error receiving broadcast Intent { act=android.net.conn.CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE flg=0x4000010 (has extras) } in androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.NetworkStateTracker$NetworkStateBroadcastReceiver@c5142c8
at android.app.LoadedApk$ReceiverDispatcher$Args.run(LoadedApk.java:876)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:902)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:697)
Caused by java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask@64a6d62 rejected from java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor@16d09ef3[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$AbortPolicy.rejectedExecution(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:2011)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.reject(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:793)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.delayedExecute(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:298)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.schedule(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:503)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$DelegatedScheduledExecutorService.schedule(Executors.java:644)
at androidx.work.impl.background.systemalarm.WorkTimer.startTimer(WorkTimer.java:82)
at androidx.work.impl.background.systemalarm.DelayMetCommandHandler.onAllConstraintsMet(DelayMetCommandHandler.java:100)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.WorkConstraintsTracker.onConstraintMet(WorkConstraintsTracker.java:150)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.controllers.ConstraintController.updateCallback(ConstraintController.java:134)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.controllers.ConstraintController.onConstraintChanged(ConstraintController.java:141)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.ConstraintTracker.setState(ConstraintTracker.java:103)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.NetworkStateTracker$NetworkStateBroadcastReceiver.onReceive(NetworkStateTracker.java:170)
at android.app.LoadedApk$ReceiverDispatcher$Args.run(LoadedApk.java:866)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:902)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:697)
Version used: WorkManager 2.1.0-alpha01
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: mostly Android 5 & 6
Fatal Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error receiving broadcast Intent { act=android.net.conn.CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE flg=0x4000010 (has extras) } in androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.NetworkStateTracker$NetworkStateBroadcastReceiver@c5142c8
at android.app.LoadedApk$ReceiverDispatcher$Args.run(LoadedApk.java:876)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:902)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:697)
Caused by java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask@64a6d62 rejected from java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor@16d09ef3[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$AbortPolicy.rejectedExecution(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:2011)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.reject(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:793)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.delayedExecute(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:298)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.schedule(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:503)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$DelegatedScheduledExecutorService.schedule(Executors.java:644)
at androidx.work.impl.background.systemalarm.WorkTimer.startTimer(WorkTimer.java:82)
at androidx.work.impl.background.systemalarm.DelayMetCommandHandler.onAllConstraintsMet(DelayMetCommandHandler.java:100)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.WorkConstraintsTracker.onConstraintMet(WorkConstraintsTracker.java:150)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.controllers.ConstraintController.updateCallback(ConstraintController.java:134)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.controllers.ConstraintController.onConstraintChanged(ConstraintController.java:141)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.ConstraintTracker.setState(ConstraintTracker.java:103)
at androidx.work.impl.constraints.trackers.NetworkStateTracker$NetworkStateBroadcastReceiver.onReceive(NetworkStateTracker.java:170)
at android.app.LoadedApk$ReceiverDispatcher$Args.run(LoadedApk.java:866)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:902)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:697)
tz...@gmail.com <tz...@gmail.com> #3
liujian16@: Are you sure this is happening on Android 6? Because the stack trace points to DelayMetCommandHandler (which is something that the AlarmManager based implementation uses) which is only used on API <= 22.
nihansin@: Sorry its not clear what you meant by
"WorkManager 2.1.0-alpha01
I know 2.1.0-alpha02 is out but I cannot test it as I CANNOT reproduce this issue on both alpha01 and 02."
Did you mean that you cannot reproduce this on your own but you see this happen in production ?
My guess is something like this might be happening:
If you have a Worker in RUNNING state, and you have been asked to stop (either because constraints are no longer met / or if you called cancel()) your Worker still needs to cooperatively cancel.
If your Worker never stops running, then WorkTimer will try and shutdown your Worker again (in 10 minutes). This time that will fail, because the Executor has already been shutdown.
This typically stems from a bug in your code (because your Worker never stopped).
Can you please turn on WorkManager's logging so it will better help us diagnose the problem ?
For this you need to use custom initialization. Something like:
Configuration configuration = new Configuration.Builder()
.setMinimumLoggingLevel(Log.VERBOSE)
.build();
WorkManager.initialize(context, configuration);
Make sure you disable the default initializer.
nihansin@: Sorry its not clear what you meant by
"WorkManager 2.1.0-alpha01
I know 2.1.0-alpha02 is out but I cannot test it as I CANNOT reproduce this issue on both alpha01 and 02."
Did you mean that you cannot reproduce this on your own but you see this happen in production ?
My guess is something like this might be happening:
If you have a Worker in RUNNING state, and you have been asked to stop (either because constraints are no longer met / or if you called cancel()) your Worker still needs to cooperatively cancel.
If your Worker never stops running, then WorkTimer will try and shutdown your Worker again (in 10 minutes). This time that will fail, because the Executor has already been shutdown.
This typically stems from a bug in your code (because your Worker never stopped).
Can you please turn on WorkManager's logging so it will better help us diagnose the problem ?
For this you need to use custom initialization. Something like:
Configuration configuration = new Configuration.Builder()
.setMinimumLoggingLevel(Log.VERBOSE)
.build();
WorkManager.initialize(context, configuration);
Make sure you disable the default initializer.
qn...@gmail.com <qn...@gmail.com> #4
I will investigate this further on my end as well.
ai...@gmail.com <ai...@gmail.com> #5
Yes, I meant that I cannot reproduce it in my tests.
Here are some points.
- I skip the job if there is an already active job when doWork is called.
- I am never call cancell and I exit with success if job takes longer than
9 minutes. However, I do do batch processing and it may be that one of the
runs in the batch might have taken more than 10 minutes.
On Thu, 23 May 2019, 18:06 , <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:
Here are some points.
- I skip the job if there is an already active job when doWork is called.
- I am never call cancell and I exit with success if job takes longer than
9 minutes. However, I do do batch processing and it may be that one of the
runs in the batch might have taken more than 10 minutes.
On Thu, 23 May 2019, 18:06 , <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #6
"I skip the job if there is an already active job when doWork is called."
What do you mean by that ?
What kind of result are you returning ?
"I am never call cancell and I exit with success if job takes longer than
9 minutes. "
How are you accounting for time ? Are you regularly polling inside your Worker ?
What do you mean by that ?
What kind of result are you returning ?
"I am never call cancell and I exit with success if job takes longer than
9 minutes. "
How are you accounting for time ? Are you regularly polling inside your Worker ?
Description
From Room point of view I think the biggest difference is new package structure:
Not sure if it affects Room but RxJava 3 supports Java 8:
RxJava 3 can live next to RxJava 2 in a project and there is an interop library that helps with making them work together:
but I think that it would still be good to have direct RxJava 3 support in Room to make the adoption of RxJava 3 faster.