Fixed
Status Update
Comments
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #2
For one of observables (single, maybe) we don't specify a subscvription thread so that developer can control where the action happens.
For flowables / observables; we always use the Room IO thread fo rthe actual query since we may repeat the work.
For LiveData, ti si always the Room IO Thread.
Until we can extend Room Query methods to receive non-query parameter (e.g. a Scheduler) we cannot do this.
At least room catches this instantly since it will crash w/ db access on main thread exception.
For flowables / observables; we always use the Room IO thread fo rthe actual query since we may repeat the work.
For LiveData, ti si always the Room IO Thread.
Until we can extend Room Query methods to receive non-query parameter (e.g. a Scheduler) we cannot do this.
At least room catches this instantly since it will crash w/ db access on main thread exception.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #3
Hello Yigit, nice to meet you here! :)
Probably I should have described the problem more clearly.
I'm using Flowable, and hopefully it executes queries in background thread (at least, app does not crash with IllegalStateException, as with Single).
But nevertheless subscribing and disposing(!) does cause StrictMode violations. Stack trace examples:
D/StrictMode: StrictMode policy violation; ~duration=17 ms: android.os.StrictMode$StrictModeDiskWriteViolation: policy=31 violation=1
at android.os.StrictMode$AndroidBlockGuardPolicy.onWriteToDisk(StrictMode.java:1111)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.applyBlockGuardPolicy(SQLiteConnection.java:1043)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.execute(SQLiteConnection.java:552)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransactionUnchecked(SQLiteSession.java:323)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransaction(SQLiteSession.java:298)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:505)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:416)
at androidx.sqlite.db.framework.FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.java:69)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:426)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:465)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.addObserver(InvalidationTracker.java:249)
at androidx.room.RxRoom$1.subscribe(RxRoom.java:79)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableCreate.subscribeActual(FlowableCreate.java:71)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14479)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableObserveOn.subscribeActual(FlowableObserveOn.java:56)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14479)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMapMaybe.subscribeActual(FlowableFlatMapMaybe.java:54)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14479)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14416)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14306)
at gmk57.strictroom.MainActivity.onCreate(MainActivity.java:30)
StrictMode policy violation; ~duration=108 ms: android.os.StrictMode$StrictModeDiskWriteViolation: policy=31 violation=1
at android.os.StrictMode$AndroidBlockGuardPolicy.onWriteToDisk(StrictMode.java:1111)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.applyBlockGuardPolicy(SQLiteConnection.java:1043)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.execute(SQLiteConnection.java:552)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransactionUnchecked(SQLiteSession.java:323)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransaction(SQLiteSession.java:298)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:505)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:416)
at androidx.sqlite.db.framework.FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.java:69)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:426)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:465)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.removeObserver(InvalidationTracker.java:281)
at androidx.room.RxRoom$1$2.run(RxRoom.java:83)
at io.reactivex.disposables.ActionDisposable.onDisposed(ActionDisposable.java:30)
at io.reactivex.disposables.ActionDisposable.onDisposed(ActionDisposable.java:19)
at io.reactivex.disposables.ReferenceDisposable.dispose(ReferenceDisposable.java:43)
at io.reactivex.internal.disposables.DisposableHelper.dispose(DisposableHelper.java:124)
at io.reactivex.internal.disposables.SequentialDisposable.dispose(SequentialDisposable.java:72)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableCreate$BaseEmitter.cancel(FlowableCreate.java:301)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableObserveOn$BaseObserveOnSubscriber.cancel(FlowableObserveOn.java:154)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMapMaybe$FlatMapMaybeSubscriber.cancel(FlowableFlatMapMaybe.java:158)
at io.reactivex.internal.subscriptions.SubscriptionHelper.cancel(SubscriptionHelper.java:189)
at io.reactivex.internal.subscribers.LambdaSubscriber.cancel(LambdaSubscriber.java:119)
at io.reactivex.internal.subscribers.LambdaSubscriber.dispose(LambdaSubscriber.java:104)
at gmk57.strictroom.MainActivity.onDestroy(MainActivity.java:37)
Probably I should have described the problem more clearly.
I'm using Flowable, and hopefully it executes queries in background thread (at least, app does not crash with IllegalStateException, as with Single).
But nevertheless subscribing and disposing(!) does cause StrictMode violations. Stack trace examples:
D/StrictMode: StrictMode policy violation; ~duration=17 ms: android.os.StrictMode$StrictModeDiskWriteViolation: policy=31 violation=1
at android.os.StrictMode$AndroidBlockGuardPolicy.onWriteToDisk(StrictMode.java:1111)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.applyBlockGuardPolicy(SQLiteConnection.java:1043)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.execute(SQLiteConnection.java:552)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransactionUnchecked(SQLiteSession.java:323)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransaction(SQLiteSession.java:298)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:505)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:416)
at androidx.sqlite.db.framework.FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.java:69)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:426)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:465)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.addObserver(InvalidationTracker.java:249)
at androidx.room.RxRoom$1.subscribe(RxRoom.java:79)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableCreate.subscribeActual(FlowableCreate.java:71)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14479)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableObserveOn.subscribeActual(FlowableObserveOn.java:56)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14479)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMapMaybe.subscribeActual(FlowableFlatMapMaybe.java:54)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14479)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14416)
at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14306)
at gmk57.strictroom.MainActivity.onCreate(MainActivity.java:30)
StrictMode policy violation; ~duration=108 ms: android.os.StrictMode$StrictModeDiskWriteViolation: policy=31 violation=1
at android.os.StrictMode$AndroidBlockGuardPolicy.onWriteToDisk(StrictMode.java:1111)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.applyBlockGuardPolicy(SQLiteConnection.java:1043)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteConnection.execute(SQLiteConnection.java:552)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransactionUnchecked(SQLiteSession.java:323)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteSession.beginTransaction(SQLiteSession.java:298)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:505)
at android.database.sqlite.SQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(SQLiteDatabase.java:416)
at androidx.sqlite.db.framework.FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.beginTransaction(FrameworkSQLiteDatabase.java:69)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:426)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.syncTriggers(InvalidationTracker.java:465)
at androidx.room.InvalidationTracker.removeObserver(InvalidationTracker.java:281)
at androidx.room.RxRoom$1$2.run(RxRoom.java:83)
at io.reactivex.disposables.ActionDisposable.onDisposed(ActionDisposable.java:30)
at io.reactivex.disposables.ActionDisposable.onDisposed(ActionDisposable.java:19)
at io.reactivex.disposables.ReferenceDisposable.dispose(ReferenceDisposable.java:43)
at io.reactivex.internal.disposables.DisposableHelper.dispose(DisposableHelper.java:124)
at io.reactivex.internal.disposables.SequentialDisposable.dispose(SequentialDisposable.java:72)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableCreate$BaseEmitter.cancel(FlowableCreate.java:301)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableObserveOn$BaseObserveOnSubscriber.cancel(FlowableObserveOn.java:154)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMapMaybe$FlatMapMaybeSubscriber.cancel(FlowableFlatMapMaybe.java:158)
at io.reactivex.internal.subscriptions.SubscriptionHelper.cancel(SubscriptionHelper.java:189)
at io.reactivex.internal.subscribers.LambdaSubscriber.cancel(LambdaSubscriber.java:119)
at io.reactivex.internal.subscribers.LambdaSubscriber.dispose(LambdaSubscriber.java:104)
at gmk57.strictroom.MainActivity.onDestroy(MainActivity.java:37)
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #4
oh this is bad :/ we should fix it, thanks!
ru...@gmail.com <ru...@gmail.com> #5
Looks like it is broken for both add observer and remove observer since both are sync.
We need to investigate this better because these methods were not @WorkerThread before and we had to change them to fix some invalidation problems (see internal bug b/73592149 ).
Luckily this is not an issue for LiveData since it uses ComputableLiveData and always calls observe on a background thread.
We need to investigate this better because these methods were not @WorkerThread before and we had to change them to fix some invalidation problems (see internal bug
Luckily this is not an issue for LiveData since it uses ComputableLiveData and always calls observe on a background thread.
k8...@gmail.com <k8...@gmail.com> #6
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 79deed62f2188a6ce2d21244dd28c3dc8ab6d0de
Author: Daniel Santiago Rivera <danysantiago@google.com>
Date: Wed Oct 17 11:07:39 2018
Specify subscribeOn and unsubscribeOn scheduler in RxRoom.
Setting subscriber and unsubscriber schedulers prevents triggers being
synced in the main thread when subscribing or disposing a RxRoom
flowable / observable.
Moved beginTransaction() calls in InvalidationTracker outside the try,
finally with endTransaction() so that exceptions thrown by
beginTransaction() aren't aborted nor forgotten.
Bug: 117201279
Test: Manual test with sample app.
Change-Id: Iefb33dc63cf78e125a8805bd66a26ada365d8453
A room/integration-tests/testapp/src/androidTest/java/androidx/room/integration/testapp/test/InvalidationTrackerTest.java
M room/runtime/src/main/java/androidx/room/InvalidationTracker.java
M room/rxjava2/src/main/java/androidx/room/RxRoom.java
M room/rxjava2/src/test/java/androidx/room/RxRoomTest.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/792524
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/79deed62f2188a6ce2d21244dd28c3dc8ab6d0de
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 79deed62f2188a6ce2d21244dd28c3dc8ab6d0de
Author: Daniel Santiago Rivera <danysantiago@google.com>
Date: Wed Oct 17 11:07:39 2018
Specify subscribeOn and unsubscribeOn scheduler in RxRoom.
Setting subscriber and unsubscriber schedulers prevents triggers being
synced in the main thread when subscribing or disposing a RxRoom
flowable / observable.
Moved beginTransaction() calls in InvalidationTracker outside the try,
finally with endTransaction() so that exceptions thrown by
beginTransaction() aren't aborted nor forgotten.
Bug: 117201279
Test: Manual test with sample app.
Change-Id: Iefb33dc63cf78e125a8805bd66a26ada365d8453
A room/integration-tests/testapp/src/androidTest/java/androidx/room/integration/testapp/test/InvalidationTrackerTest.java
M room/runtime/src/main/java/androidx/room/InvalidationTracker.java
M room/rxjava2/src/main/java/androidx/room/RxRoom.java
M room/rxjava2/src/test/java/androidx/room/RxRoomTest.java
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8
Run
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #9
Run
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #10
Run
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #11
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit 895c4bb35ee11fe1c54f538699a845ddfaf7e2eb
Author: Clara Fok <clarafok@google.com>
Date: Tue May 09 13:14:10 2023
Migrate accompanist ComposeNavigator into androidx
Test: ./gradlew navigation:navigation-compose:cC
Bug: 197140101
Relnote: "ComposeNavigator now supports Destinations with Animations."
Change-Id: Ie33b4c2da53ff6c89494332a06be8123be67e879
M navigation/navigation-compose/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/compose/ComposeNavigator.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/2584841
Branch: androidx-main
commit 895c4bb35ee11fe1c54f538699a845ddfaf7e2eb
Author: Clara Fok <clarafok@google.com>
Date: Tue May 09 13:14:10 2023
Migrate accompanist ComposeNavigator into androidx
Test: ./gradlew navigation:navigation-compose:cC
Bug: 197140101
Relnote: "ComposeNavigator now supports Destinations with Animations."
Change-Id: Ie33b4c2da53ff6c89494332a06be8123be67e879
M navigation/navigation-compose/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/compose/ComposeNavigator.kt
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #12
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit 169254301b8aad0454c253a65abff7bf174ba164
Author: Clara Fok <clarafok@google.com>
Date: Tue May 09 11:11:42 2023
Bump compose version in navigation-compose
Bump from 1.0.1 to ToT project dependency. Project dependency because compose is currently in alpha.
Test: n/a
Bug: 197140101
Relnote: "navigation-compose has bumped compose dependency to use latest compose dependency"
Change-Id: Ide442548636637c2b75d46ef99c9913b0ebb60b8
M navigation/navigation-compose/build.gradle
https://android-review.googlesource.com/2584840
Branch: androidx-main
commit 169254301b8aad0454c253a65abff7bf174ba164
Author: Clara Fok <clarafok@google.com>
Date: Tue May 09 11:11:42 2023
Bump compose version in navigation-compose
Bump from 1.0.1 to ToT project dependency. Project dependency because compose is currently in alpha.
Test: n/a
Bug: 197140101
Relnote: "navigation-compose has bumped compose dependency to use latest compose dependency"
Change-Id: Ide442548636637c2b75d46ef99c9913b0ebb60b8
M navigation/navigation-compose/build.gradle
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #13
Now that AnimatedContent
is stable, we were able to move the code from
This means all of the support for setting custom transitions that existed in AnimatedNavHost
is directly supported in NavHost
.
This is available in
We'll be publishing a deprecation guide once Navigation 2.7.0-alpha01 is released, but it'll be essentially the inverse of the 0.31.2-alpha
).
Description
As of compose Compose Animation APIs are still
1.0.1
many of the@Experimental
.Because of AndroidX internal restrictions, modules cannot depend on experimental APIs from other modules.
In the interest of providing a solution for Navigation with custom Compose Animations as soon as possible, we opted to provide a new module in Accompanist Navigation . Once all the required animation APIs become stable, which is planned as part of Compose
1.1.0
, we will move the implementation back into theJetpack Navigation library
fromAccompanist Navigation Animation
.For more details, see the Animations in Navigation Compose blog post.