Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #2
Please include a sample project that reproduces your issue.
me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #3
Steps to reproduce:
1. Press on "Search" icon;
2. Write something;
3. Search this text, keyboard will be dismissed;
4. Tap on "Dialog" button;
5. Dissmiss dialog;
With the new 1.5.0 fragment library version text will be cleared in the search box after dismissing dialog.
In the version 1.4.1 and lower text in the search is not clearing and this is correct behaviour.
Please suggest some workarounds or how to fix this issue?
me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #4
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #5
me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #6
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #7
Hello
I raised similar issue with this ticket
This makes the SearchView unusable/broken when fragments are changed (i.e base on searchView input query)
What can we do to fix this problem? What is the progress of work on solving this problem?
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #8
ab...@gmail.com <ab...@gmail.com> #9
Any idea on when it will be fixed?
me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #10
ab...@gmail.com <ab...@gmail.com> #11
Can you update regarding any progress on this issue.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com>
sa...@google.com <sa...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #13
Branch: androidx-main
commit 50f098644adc703ae218b0b7e999629f516a0241
Author: sanura <sanura@google.com>
Date: Thu Mar 02 00:11:35 2023
Add check to only invalidate options menu when contributing menu items
FragmentManager previously appropriately only added
a MenuProvider when the host is a MenuHost **and**
we are at the root fragment that is providing the
menu items. This behavior should be mirrored when
removing a MenuProvider as well, so that only
components that directly contribute menu items will
invalidate the options menu.
Bug: 244336571
Test: all tests pass
Change-Id: I9404ee9fcc9ce6b80d70a93bea720fe4ccf583a0
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentContainerInflatedFragmentTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/OptionsMenuFragmentTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/test/FragmentTestActivity.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentActivity.java
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentManager.java
sa...@google.com <sa...@google.com>
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #14
Please show what to write on gradle file.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #15
This has been fixed internally and will be available in the Fragment 1.6.0-alpha07
release.
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #16
It's part of the material dependency, perhaps?
na...@google.com <na...@google.com> #17
The following release(s) address this bug.It is possible this bug has only been partially addressed:
androidx.fragment:fragment:1.6.0-alpha07
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #18
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #19
It says "Duplicate class found".
The IDE doesn't provide any useful explanation of what is the class that is duplicated and what to do about it.
Please help.
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #20
The following release(s) address this bug.It is possible this bug has only been partially addressed:
androidx.fragment:fragment:1.5.6
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #21
th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #22
@21 androidx.fragment:fragment:1.5.6 is a STABLE release. It has the fix we need. The androidx.fragment:fragment:1.6.0-alpha07 is an alpha as it says. 1.6 is "work in progress". 1.6.0 is still not a stable release. Use "alpha" only for testing
Description
Version used: 1.5.2
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Android 12
I'm using SearchView in my Activity. If SearchView is expanded and i'm opening DialogFragment on the top of the activity and then dismissing it, SearchView is being collapsed. It must not collapse.
Seems like some bug in Fragment 1.5.0 - 1.5.2 version. In 1.4.1 version everything is working fine.
Please suggest some workarounds or how to fix this issue?