Fixed
Status Update
Comments
da...@sucharda.cz <da...@sucharda.cz> #2
This has been fixed internally in https://android-review.googlesource.com/870975 and will be available in Navigation 1.0.0-alpha10.
Now, instead of crashing, we ignore invalid deep links, printing a log message saying as much.
Now, instead of crashing, we ignore invalid deep links, printing a log message saying as much.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #3
Hi team.
The problem still occurs on version 2.2.0-rc04
The problem still occurs on version 2.2.0-rc04
da...@sucharda.cz <da...@sucharda.cz> #4
Hi, still getting crash for 2.1.0
da...@sucharda.cz <da...@sucharda.cz> #5
still getting crash on version 2.2.0
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #7
still getting crash with 2.2.1
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #8
findInvalidDestinationDisplayNameInDeepLink always return null if deepLink length == 1 (deep link destination is start destination of any navGraph of BottomNavigationView)
NavDestination node = i == 0 ? mGraph : graph.findNode(destinationId);
if deepLink.length == 1 node never will be null and this will cause IllegalStateException
Bug demo:
get NavigationAdvancedSample from github
on R.id.about_btn click
NavDeepLinkBuilder(it.context)
.setGraph(R.navigation.list)
.setDestination(R.id.leaderboard)
.createTaskStackBuilder()
.startActivities()
will crash because R.id.leaderboard is start destination (findInvalidDestinationDisplayNameInDeepLink will have deepLink length == 1)
NavDeepLinkBuilder(it.context)
.setGraph(R.navigation.list)
.setDestination(R.id.userProfile)
.createTaskStackBuilder()
.startActivities()
will work because findInvalidDestinationDisplayNameInDeepLink will return NOT null
NavDestination node = i == 0 ? mGraph : graph.findNode(destinationId);
if deepLink.length == 1 node never will be null and this will cause IllegalStateException
Bug demo:
get NavigationAdvancedSample from github
on R.id.about_btn click
NavDeepLinkBuilder(it.context)
.setGraph(R.navigation.list)
.setDestination(R.id.leaderboard)
.createTaskStackBuilder()
.startActivities()
will crash because R.id.leaderboard is start destination (findInvalidDestinationDisplayNameInDeepLink will have deepLink length == 1)
NavDeepLinkBuilder(it.context)
.setGraph(R.navigation.list)
.setDestination(R.id.userProfile)
.createTaskStackBuilder()
.startActivities()
will work because findInvalidDestinationDisplayNameInDeepLink will return NOT null
Description
Component used: Navigation
Version used: 2.5.1 and 2.5.2
Last known working version: 2.3.5
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Huawei P20 Light / AN 9 (EMUI 9.1.0)
So our navigation is kinda complex so I will try to simplify the configuration. If there is a nested graph with arguments which cannot be null (and no default value is supplied) and
popUpTo
is used to remove nested graph during destination (nested) navigation it tries to recreate nested graph as a parent for the destination being navigated to.So now if the navigation is triggered like this:
It will pop fragments from back stack, but it will not change parent for
ChildFragment2
which will be set tochildNavGraph
and since it is not in the back stack anymore it will try to recreate it with default values. ButargumentLong
is not nullable and has no default value so it will crash:Note: Interesting thing is that it does not crash with non-nullable String argument for some reason (ah I see, it is because String NavType is nullable by default:
StringType: NavType<String?>
vsLongType: NavType<Long>
).Possible fixes for us:
popUpTo
to pop parent (navGraph) of a Fragment (node) from XML but usepopBackStack
from code instead.argumentLong
.Basically I am not sure if this an intended behavior or a bug. Gonna mark it as a bug because it worked in 2.3.5. I understand that Destination should have a parent but what is the reason to create a parent that does not exist and will never be displayed in this case, since it was already poped and thus it should not be displayed to the user.
At the moment two solutions come to mind:
LongType
and other types nullable same asStringType
. Again not sure if this can be done and it probably is not a proper solution (change).There might of course be other solutions that I cannot see.
Thank you for your time and help.