Fixed
Status Update
Comments
ry...@google.com <ry...@google.com> #2
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #3
> We accept pull requests! :)
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it inhttps://android.googlesource.com , and it doesn't seem to be inside https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/support .
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
Is there a public repo somewhere? I don't see any obvious repo for it in
Room supports final fields (yay!), which probably will suffice for many people with respect to this feature request.
hu...@google.com <hu...@google.com> #4
Room supports immutability (it can use arg constructors) but does not directly support AutoValue. It is in the schedule but not high priority :/. Idk much about its internals at this stage so I'm not sure how we would implement it but should be totally doable.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/.
hu...@google.com <hu...@google.com> #5
"It is in the schedule but not high priority" -- completely understandable.
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
"Sorry we don't have the source release yet :/." -- ah, OK, I thought perhaps with the pull request comment, that meant that there was a repo somewhere that I had overlooked.
Thanks!
ry...@google.com <ry...@google.com> #6
Add autovalue support also means you can easily achieve parcelable by https://github.com/rharter/auto-value-parcel . Please consider support this.
hu...@google.com <hu...@google.com> #7
AutoValue is really a handy way to ensure data integrity.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8
Please add AutoValue support. AutoValue is a Google library with really good benefits such as toString() , hashCode() , AutoValue.Builder , checks at creation time if @NonNull values are null, etc.
ju...@google.com <ju...@google.com> #9
FWIW, issue 64206877 is not publicly accessible.
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #10
@Yigit: That appears to be a private ticket. Any way we can have access to keep up with it?
Description
Quoting Adam Powell on an internal issue: