Status Update
Comments
ha...@reddit.com <ha...@reddit.com> #2
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit b55fe68edc02b253b908a1c7c2e98350ba67afe4
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Wed Aug 12 14:21:57 2020
Ignore Animations/Animator when Transitions run
For a given Fragment, a single owner for its
transition from visible to non-visible is needed
to avoid conflicts as different systems try to
influence the same set of properties.
This has two consequences:
- Animations (which work at the parent container level)
will interfere if there are *any* Transitions run.
- Animators will interfere if there are any Transitions
run on that specific Fragment.
By tracking which Transitions were started and using
that information to selectively ignore conflicting
Animations/Animators, we can avoid visual artifacts.
Test: updated tests pass
BUG: 149569323
Change-Id: I9e5169ffd36853c3dfbd7f217837a74674a9508d
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentTransitionAnimTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/DefaultSpecialEffectsController.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1398530
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit b55fe68edc02b253b908a1c7c2e98350ba67afe4
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Wed Aug 12 14:21:57 2020
Ignore Animations/Animator when Transitions run
For a given Fragment, a single owner for its
transition from visible to non-visible is needed
to avoid conflicts as different systems try to
influence the same set of properties.
This has two consequences:
- Animations (which work at the parent container level)
will interfere if there are *any* Transitions run.
- Animators will interfere if there are any Transitions
run on that specific Fragment.
By tracking which Transitions were started and using
that information to selectively ignore conflicting
Animations/Animators, we can avoid visual artifacts.
Test: updated tests pass
BUG: 149569323
Change-Id: I9e5169ffd36853c3dfbd7f217837a74674a9508d
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentTransitionAnimTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/DefaultSpecialEffectsController.java
ma...@google.com <ma...@google.com> #3
There are two parallel systems in Android - the Animation
system and the Animator
system (which the Transition
system is built on top of). With this change and Fragment 1.3.0-alpha08, no Animation
will run if there are any Transitions kicked off at the same time and no Animator
will run on Fragments that have Transitions directly associated with them (either via an enter/exit transition or as part of a shared element transition).
ry...@google.com <ry...@google.com> #4
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit fa55358f7f2870bf05ef5cce12d2b4e2d86732aa
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Sep 14 11:30:52 2020
Ignore Animations when Animators run
As a continuation of the work in b/149569323 ,
we now prioritize running Animators over running
Animations. This avoids cases where both are
running simultaneously.
As Animations and Animators are now properly
decoupled, we can use animator.cancel() when
our CancelationSignal is triggered instead of
using clearAnimation().
Test: all tests pass, updated FragmentAnimatorTest passes
BUG: 167579557
Change-Id: I7b3f5c1cc1355e02ff770838cb485d659dfb1619
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentAnimatorTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/DefaultSpecialEffectsController.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1427449
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit fa55358f7f2870bf05ef5cce12d2b4e2d86732aa
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Mon Sep 14 11:30:52 2020
Ignore Animations when Animators run
As a continuation of the work in
we now prioritize running Animators over running
Animations. This avoids cases where both are
running simultaneously.
As Animations and Animators are now properly
decoupled, we can use animator.cancel() when
our CancelationSignal is triggered instead of
using clearAnimation().
Test: all tests pass, updated FragmentAnimatorTest passes
BUG: 167579557
Change-Id: I7b3f5c1cc1355e02ff770838cb485d659dfb1619
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentAnimatorTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/DefaultSpecialEffectsController.java
ry...@google.com <ry...@google.com> #5
This has been addressed in RecyclerView 1.3.1-rc01; please let us know if it's still happening.
ha...@reddit.com <ha...@reddit.com> #6
I can confirm this is fixed in RecyclerView 1.3.1-rc01. Thanks a lot!
Description
Steps to Reproduce or Code Sample to Reproduce:
See MainActivity in attached sample project, or:
Note: RV refers to
RecyclerView
RecyclerView
RecyclerView
are emptyFrameLayout
sonBindViewHolder
of the RV adapter, createComposeView
and add it as a child to theFrameLayout
. CallsetContent
on theComposeView
with arbitrary layout (e.g. coloredBox
)notifyItemChanged(0, Any())
Behavior:
What I would expect to happen: No crash happens
What actually happens:
onBindViewHolder
call, theparent
field of theRecyclerView
item view will benull
, but itsmAttachInfo
will not benull
ComposeView
is added to the item view, itsisAttachedToWindow
will be true, and it will try to create a composition.ViewTreeLifecycleOwner
usingView.findViewTreeLifecycleOwner()
which tries walking up the view hierarchy to obtain the owner from the root view.parent
,View.findViewTreeLifecycleOwner()
returns null, andView.createLifecycleAwareWindowRecomposer()
throws and crashes the app.Stack trace (if applicable):