Status Update
Comments
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #2
We are currently using AGP internal task types to flag memory-intensive tasks to enforce a reduced parallelism at execution time. I've raised this separately (with a lot more detail) as a feature request (
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #4
Another use case that we have is to reactively respond to the creation of APKs and AABs. The new AGP APIs allow us to connect out tasks into the artifact pipeline via wiredWith
but the best we can come up with to receive the completed artifact is to wire in toTransform
. This A) does not guarantee that we will receive the final artifact as more transforms may be applied after our task is called, and B) requires us to copy the input property file/dir to our tasks output property file/dir in order to not break the build cache.
The reactive behavior of the above is the complicating factor.
A non-reactive approach could simply depend upon the task name and then look for a hardcoded path in the build directory (which is still sort of gross, since the build output paths are not documented as public API and change from time to time).
Another approach would be to wire a custom task to consume the output of the build via the built artifacts loader feeding an input property. However, this approach cannot be applied reactively. Either the custom task is included in the build and causes the creation of the binary artifact, or it is not included in the build and never gets invoked.
Description
Component used: Activity
Version used: 1.7.2
As explained in the Predictive Back guide , you shouldn't use an
OnBackPressedCallback
for non-UI cases (for example, just for logging back). If you add a callback, you have to handle back completely in your callback.That means that calling
remove()
and triggering back viarequireActivity.onBackPressed()
oronBackPressedDispatcher.onBackPressed()
is always an anti-pattern and something that you should not do.It would be helpful if there was a Lint error that specifically catch this case and warn developers ahead of time that this is the wrong thing to do and offer alternatives or at least link to the guide for more information.