Fixed
Status Update
Comments
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com>
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com> #2
Yigit, do you have time to fix it?
reemission of the same liveData is racy
reemission of the same liveData is racy
va...@google.com <va...@google.com> #3
yea i'll take it.
va...@google.com <va...@google.com> #4
Thanks for the detailed analysis. This may not be an issue anymore since we've started using Main.immediate there but I' not sure; I'll try to create a test case.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #5
just emitting same live data reproduces the issue.
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #6
With 2.2.0-alpha04 (that use Main.immediate), the issue seems to be still there (I tested it by calling emitSource() twice, like your test case)
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #7
yea sorry immediate does not fix it.
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/frameworks/support/+/1112186
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #8
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1112186
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com>
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com> #9
The API has changed since that project was created in a way that makes the API more robust. I'm hoping that has fixed this...
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com> #10
There appears to be a problem with the order of operations. I'm going to look into fixing that.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #11
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit e57dd5f9ac6cbb8cf83b221e2d5b3fbd3e88ce6b
Author: George Mount <mount@google.com>
Date: Thu Nov 09 14:33:53 2023
Fix animateToStart with Slide.
Fixes: 300157785
Slide was not repositioning the View to its proper
translation after animating it to the start position.
This fixes that so that it is moved.
Test: new test
Change-Id: I698f4dbcef46304f9aa545847d205f7b70c80d63
M transition/transition/src/androidTest/java/androidx/transition/SlideEdgeTest.java
M transition/transition/src/androidTest/java/androidx/transition/TranslationAnimationCreatorTest.java
M transition/transition/src/main/java/androidx/transition/TranslationAnimationCreator.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/2824840
Branch: androidx-main
commit e57dd5f9ac6cbb8cf83b221e2d5b3fbd3e88ce6b
Author: George Mount <mount@google.com>
Date: Thu Nov 09 14:33:53 2023
Fix animateToStart with Slide.
Fixes: 300157785
Slide was not repositioning the View to its proper
translation after animating it to the start position.
This fixes that so that it is moved.
Test: new test
Change-Id: I698f4dbcef46304f9aa545847d205f7b70c80d63
M transition/transition/src/androidTest/java/androidx/transition/SlideEdgeTest.java
M transition/transition/src/androidTest/java/androidx/transition/TranslationAnimationCreatorTest.java
M transition/transition/src/main/java/androidx/transition/TranslationAnimationCreator.java
pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #12
The following release(s) address this bug.It is possible this bug has only been partially addressed:
androidx.transition:transition:1.5.0-alpha05
Description
Component used: Transition Version used: 1.5.0-alpha02 Devices/Android versions reproduced on: API 34
If you do a gesture back in Fragments using transitions and cancel the gesture multiple times, after the first cancel, starting the gesture will result in the transition on the exiting view failing to run.
I believe the cause of this is that the this
beginDelayedTransition()
called by with a 0 duration called by Fragment never triggersonAnimatedEnd()
callback inVisibility
. That results in the visibility failing to be added removed from the overlay and so the subsequent transitions on the view do not run.Here are logs synced with the calls from Fragment and Visibility. I would expect there to be an
onAnimationEnd reversed=false
log before theonTransitionEnd
in Visibility.The can be reproduced by patching in aosp/2748867 and doing the following in the navigation-integration app :