Concurrency runInTransaction cause InterruptedException [400584611]

Fixed

Bug

Status Update

No update yet.

Description

ly...@gmail.com

created issue #1

Mar 4, 2025 09:48AM

Component used:room

Version used:2.7.0-rc01

Exception

    Caused by: java.lang.InterruptedException
    	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:94)
    	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:69)
    	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source:1)
    	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:47)
    	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source:1)
    	at androidx.room.util.DBUtil__DBUtil_androidKt.performBlocking(DBUtil.android.kt:69)
    	at androidx.room.util.DBUtil.performBlocking(Unknown Source:1)
    	at XXXDao_Impl.xxxxx(XXXDao_Impl.kt)
    	at androidx.room.RoomDatabase.runInTransaction(RoomDatabase.android.kt:733)

PS, please don't reference my email in comment

Comments

ly...@gmail.com <ly...@gmail.com> #2Mar 5, 2025 01:39AM

I'd also love to see this as a formula, in order to apply conditional formatting based on the whether the content of a cell passes the data validation rule or not. Something like ISVALID(value).

da...@google.com <da...@google.com> #3Mar 6, 2025 02:41PM

I'm completely baffled: what's the point of "Data Validation" if there's no way of checking whether the data satisfies the condition? Could we all be missing something?

ly...@gmail.com <ly...@gmail.com> #4Mar 7, 2025 12:15AM

@marc.art: The validation still validates within the UI itself; it's just that the results of the validation aren't available in code.

ly...@gmail.com <ly...@gmail.com> #5Mar 11, 2025 06:24AM

This would be extremely helpful! Im looking to optimize my team's workflow and it is counterintuitive and wasteful on resources to reverse engineer the validation just to check if it is valid when that information is already shown in the UI! Please add .isValid()!!

da...@google.com <da...@google.com> #6Mar 13, 2025 12:39PM

This is a blocking feature for implementing a compliance changelog of only valid entries.

ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #7Mar 19, 2025 03:19PM

Would definitely be useful.

ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8Mar 19, 2025 10:17PM

Can't see why this isn't already available. I hope it is added soon!

da...@google.com <da...@google.com> Mar 19, 2025 10:18PM

Marked as fixed.