Fixed
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
yb...@google.com
what is in update.zip ? can you share that file to triage this issue
an...@gmail.com
MHC19Q for Nexus 5X (bullhead) - https://dl.google.com/dl/android/aosp//bullhead-ota-mhc19q-8fe67a2b.zip
N4F26T for Nexus 5X (bullhead) -https://dl.google.com/dl/android/aosp/bullhead-ota-n4f26t-648ce802.zip
WW-12.2.5.23 for Asus ZenFone Go (ASUS_X014D) -http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/ZenFone/ZB452KG/UL-ASUS_X014D-WW-12.2.5.23-user.zip
Look like, this happens only with a big images.
N4F26T for Nexus 5X (bullhead) -
WW-12.2.5.23 for Asus ZenFone Go (ASUS_X014D) -
Look like, this happens only with a big images.
fr...@gmail.com
On Windows 10 (x64)
da...@google.com
xm...@gmail.com
related to (and probably worked around for now by) internal bug http://b/36046324
i do think we should also start shipping a 64-bit Windows platform tools package.
we should also consider changing android::base::ReadFdToString to call fstat and pre-size the vector. not worthwhile for reading things like /proc/uptime, but the default expansion behavior for a huge file like a full OTA update is going to result in substantial overhead. (which will explain the regression between .3 and .4, since the former will have allocated exactly the necessary number of bytes.)
lastly (and maybe not worth doing at all, depending on how soon we can get folks to use a 64-bit platform tools on Windows, since all the other platforms are already 64-bit-only), we could consider rewriting the adb sideload code to (a) mmap/munmap rather than actually read in to physical memory or (b) pread. i'm not sure what the performance impact of pread would be (especially on Windows where there is no pread equivalent).
i do think we should also start shipping a 64-bit Windows platform tools package.
we should also consider changing android::base::ReadFdToString to call fstat and pre-size the vector. not worthwhile for reading things like /proc/uptime, but the default expansion behavior for a huge file like a full OTA update is going to result in substantial overhead. (which will explain the regression between .3 and .4, since the former will have allocated exactly the necessary number of bytes.)
lastly (and maybe not worth doing at all, depending on how soon we can get folks to use a 64-bit platform tools on Windows, since all the other platforms are already 64-bit-only), we could consider rewriting the adb sideload code to (a) mmap/munmap rather than actually read in to physical memory or (b) pread. i'm not sure what the performance impact of pread would be (especially on Windows where there is no pread equivalent).
mu...@gmail.com
Correction to #5: Windows does support pread() - it's in ReadFile()'s OVERLAPPED parameter.
wo...@gmail.com
@7: we'd still need to write the pread wrapper, though. (similar if we went with mmap/munmap.)
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/355481/ pre-sizes the vector, which should be enough to undo the regression from '.3 to '.4...
ya...@google.com
ap...@google.com
ya...@google.com
to...@gmail.com
Hi I'm getting the same issue on Windows 10 when I try to sideload a TWRP backup.
- adb devices gives my device
- adb usb gives error: closed
- adb sideload 6.13.771.4_ckpv5.zip gives
loading: '6.13.771.4_ckpv5.zip'...
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
what(): std::bad_alloc
This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information.
Please can somebody help with this issue I've been trying to sort this for 3 days. Thanks.
- adb devices gives my device
- adb usb gives error: closed
- adb sideload 6.13.771.4_ckpv5.zip gives
loading: '6.13.771.4_ckpv5.zip'...
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
what(): std::bad_alloc
This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information.
Please can somebody help with this issue I've been trying to sort this for 3 days. Thanks.
jp...@gmail.com
I also get this problem. Is there a workaround?
Description
Version used: 1.0.0-beta1
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: n/a
There appears to be no way to execute a CREATE VIEW in a way that Room will recognize. Instead, developers seem to need some icky workarounds (see
My guess is that there should be a VIEW equivalent of @Entity, where the annotation takes the SELECT statement to go after the AS in the CREATE VIEW statement, where the Room compiler then assembles the rest.
Alternatively, @Entity could be extended to support views (e.g., via a viewSelect annotation property that triggers CREATE VIEW instead of CREATE TABLE logic). Bonus points here: there's no need to figure out the right annotation for a VIEW (since @View probably has been used 28 times already in various Android annotation processors...). :-)
Thanks for considering this!