Fixed
Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #2
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit b90079595f33f58fece04026a97faa0d243acdb1
Author: Yuichi Araki <yaraki@google.com>
Date: Wed Sep 18 16:55:49 2019
Change the way to detect mismatch between POJO and query
This fixes cursor mismatch warnings with expandProjection.
Bug: 140759491
Test: QueryMethodProcessorTest
Change-Id: I7659002e5e0d1ef60fc1af2a625c0c36da0664d8
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/processor/QueryMethodProcessor.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/TypeAdapterStore.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/query/result/PojoRowAdapter.kt
M room/compiler/src/test/kotlin/androidx/room/processor/QueryMethodProcessorTest.kt
M room/compiler/src/test/kotlin/androidx/room/testing/TestProcessor.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1123258
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/b90079595f33f58fece04026a97faa0d243acdb1
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit b90079595f33f58fece04026a97faa0d243acdb1
Author: Yuichi Araki <yaraki@google.com>
Date: Wed Sep 18 16:55:49 2019
Change the way to detect mismatch between POJO and query
This fixes cursor mismatch warnings with expandProjection.
Bug: 140759491
Test: QueryMethodProcessorTest
Change-Id: I7659002e5e0d1ef60fc1af2a625c0c36da0664d8
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/processor/QueryMethodProcessor.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/TypeAdapterStore.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/query/result/PojoRowAdapter.kt
M room/compiler/src/test/kotlin/androidx/room/processor/QueryMethodProcessorTest.kt
M room/compiler/src/test/kotlin/androidx/room/testing/TestProcessor.kt
as...@gmail.com <as...@gmail.com> #3
ju...@gmail.com <ju...@gmail.com> #4
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit bdde5a1a970ddc9007b28de4aa29d60ffa588f08
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Thu Apr 16 16:47:05 2020
Re-factor how errors are dismissed when query is re-written
This CL changes how we handle errors/warnings if query is
re-written.
There was a bug in expandProjection where we would report warnings
for things that Room already fixes automatically ( b/140759491 ).
The solution to that problem (I7659002e5e0d1ef60fc1af2a625c0c36da0664d8)
solved it by deferring validating of columns until after re-write
decision is made. Unfortunately, this required changing PojoRowAdapter
to have a dummy mapping until it is validating, make it hard to use
as it does have a non-null mapping which is not useful.
This CL partially reverts that change and instead rely on the log
deferring logic we have in Context. This way, we don't need to break
the stability of PojoRowAdapter while still having the ability to
drop warnings that room fixes. This will also play nicer when we
have different query re-writing options that can use more information
about the query results.
Bug: 153387066
Bug: 140759491
Test: existing tests pass
Change-Id: I2ec967c763d33d7a3ff02c1a13c6953b460d1e5f
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/log/RLog.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/processor/QueryMethodProcessor.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/TypeAdapterStore.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/query/result/PojoRowAdapter.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1288456
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit bdde5a1a970ddc9007b28de4aa29d60ffa588f08
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Thu Apr 16 16:47:05 2020
Re-factor how errors are dismissed when query is re-written
This CL changes how we handle errors/warnings if query is
re-written.
There was a bug in expandProjection where we would report warnings
for things that Room already fixes automatically (
The solution to that problem (I7659002e5e0d1ef60fc1af2a625c0c36da0664d8)
solved it by deferring validating of columns until after re-write
decision is made. Unfortunately, this required changing PojoRowAdapter
to have a dummy mapping until it is validating, make it hard to use
as it does have a non-null mapping which is not useful.
This CL partially reverts that change and instead rely on the log
deferring logic we have in Context. This way, we don't need to break
the stability of PojoRowAdapter while still having the ability to
drop warnings that room fixes. This will also play nicer when we
have different query re-writing options that can use more information
about the query results.
Bug: 153387066
Bug: 140759491
Test: existing tests pass
Change-Id: I2ec967c763d33d7a3ff02c1a13c6953b460d1e5f
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/log/RLog.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/processor/QueryMethodProcessor.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/TypeAdapterStore.kt
M room/compiler/src/main/kotlin/androidx/room/solver/query/result/PojoRowAdapter.kt
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #5
externalCacheFile.delete()
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #6
#1
ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #7
Hi
re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #9
Drive way
je...@gmail.com <je...@gmail.com> #10
Hoka
hd...@gmail.com <hd...@gmail.com> #11 Restricted
Restricted
Comment has been deleted.
ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #12
Comment has been deleted.
la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #14
Hi
sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #15
Fortnit
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #16
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 790ebb8dfa2f0e5ffcfc41d88c2cf04288157e67
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Thu Aug 23 10:50:43 2018
Move Fragment's view lifecycle to stopped
The Fragment's view lifecycle should be stopped
when the Fragment's lifecycle is stopped.
Moves the ON_CREATE event to after onViewStateRestored()
and ON_DESTROY event from onDestroyView()
to performDestroyView() to fully mirror the lifecycle.
Test: new testViewLifecycleInFragmentLifecycle() test
Fixes: 113070421
Change-Id: Id03d664fba627f7aab615b76d3e615496e88d6e2
M fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentViewLifecycleTest.java
M fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/Fragment.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/737168
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 790ebb8dfa2f0e5ffcfc41d88c2cf04288157e67
Author: Ian Lake <ilake@google.com>
Date: Thu Aug 23 10:50:43 2018
Move Fragment's view lifecycle to stopped
The Fragment's view lifecycle should be stopped
when the Fragment's lifecycle is stopped.
Moves the ON_CREATE event to after onViewStateRestored()
and ON_DESTROY event from onDestroyView()
to performDestroyView() to fully mirror the lifecycle.
Test: new testViewLifecycleInFragmentLifecycle() test
Fixes: 113070421
Change-Id: Id03d664fba627f7aab615b76d3e615496e88d6e2
M fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentViewLifecycleTest.java
M fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/Fragment.java
Description
Version used: 28.0.0-rc01
Theme used: n/a
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Pixel 2.0, Android 8.0
The sample app is an simple activity with a ViewPager of fragments for which each fragment is observing "TestLiveData" subclass of LiveData . When an instance of "TestLiveData" is observed with the fragment as its LifecycleOwner both LiveData.onActive()/onIsactive() is triggered if the app is foregrounded and backgrounded. However, if a Fragment.getViewLifecycleOwner() is provided to observe LiveData.onInactive() is never called.
Simply launch the sample app and notice the log output of "onActive()" and then push the app into the background. You will notice that there is no "onInactive" called. It is however called when cycling thru the ViewPager but shouldn't it be called when the app is backgrounded?