Keep support for multiple levels of sub tasks [113611082]

Infeasible

Feature Request

Status Update

No update yet.

Description

jo...@gmail.com

created issue #1

Aug 31, 2018 09:22AM

In August 2018 Google announced to remove the support for multiple levels of sub tasks from the task API in August 2019.
Multiple level of sub tasks is a unique feature in Google Tasks. We know many people that using Google Tasks just because of this functionality. If Google drops the support of that feature then Google Tasks becomes just like any other task application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A short description of the request:
Keep the support of multiple level of sub tasks

What is the purpose of this new feature?
Keep the support of multiple level of sub tasks at least in the task API so that existing custom clients can continue to use that feature.
Ideally, enhance the existing application (e.g. the one that is integrated into GMail, the official Android app) to support multiple level of sub tasks as well.

What existing APIs would this affect?
Task API

What existing data does this use?
-

Please provide any additional information below.

Comments

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #2Aug 31, 2018 12:45PM

Chrome Diagnostics Report of following results:

The DNS diagnostic test in Chrome Diagnostics Report is known to have some issues in some configuration. Internal bug id is b/353448388. This problem is fixed starting from m130.

Here the diagnostic failure could indicate a real problem. Jason, Jie, what m126 bugs could this report be a duplicate of ?

ce...@gmail.com <ce...@gmail.com> #3Aug 31, 2018 04:51PM

what m126 bugs could this report be a duplicate of ?

Not anything off the top of my head now (maybe Jason knows other). Since the device is not enterprise-enrolled according to the information in #1, I assume it should not hit the diagnostic DNS issue in b/353448388.

But I assume the reporter also encountered the issue of "no connection to gateway" in the diagnostic app, which is partially fixed on M128 in b/277696397 (internal link). Before M128, the diagnostic app will wrongly report gateway connection issue if there is IPv6 on the network, while on M128+ this issue will only happen on IPv6-only (no IPv4) networks.

Re #1,

Thanks for reporting the issue and sorry for the late reply here. A few questions to help us understanding the issue bettter:

Are you still experiencing this issue? If so, could you file a feedback report (alt-shift-i, and put "b/360530624" in the textbox so that we can search for it easily) when you are seeing it again?
Does it only happen on a certain WiFi network? If it's the case, do you by chance have other devices (not Chromebook) to see if they work on the same network?

Thanks!

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #4Sep 4, 2018 09:59AM

This might be a dup of the internal bug of b/344462428 (may show up as unreliable WiFi, b/347596358). This issue is fixed from platform version 15886.77.0 (M126).

As Jie mentioned, if this is still reproducible, a feedback report would help debug the issue further. Thank you!

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #5Sep 4, 2018 06:45PM

rainy@littlebearcoffee.com, would you be able to try to reproduce this issue on a more recent ChromeOS release and provide a feedback report (shift + alt + i) if you can ? Thanks

ju...@gmail.com <ju...@gmail.com> #6Sep 6, 2018 04:33AM

Bugjuggler: wait 8w -> hugobenichi

Message last modified on Feb 20, 2019 04:49PM

af...@gmail.com <af...@gmail.com> #7Sep 7, 2018 06:51PM

Hi. I've received your bug and will wait until 2024-12-04 16:58 +0900 JST and then assign the bug to hugobenichi.

sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #8Sep 10, 2018 02:42PM

Thanks for getting back to me on the issue. In response to

comment #3

:
It is still happening, so I will report the next instance with the requested text. It doesn't happen on a specific network, but all networks I am connecting to. It's not repeatable on other non ChromeOS devices in at least two of those, but is repeatable on the exact same device of another owner. I can ask them to also report with the reference number if that is helpful. Let me know if I can provide any additional information or troubleshooting.

I am out of the office for a few days this weekend, but should be able to repeat issue by eod Monday.

tc...@dogtowndev.com <tc...@dogtowndev.com> #9Sep 12, 2018 05:48PM

Wanted to update that I have sent several feedback reports with the issue #. It didn't seem to be happening for a few days and today it is back to happening at least every few hours (have changed location/wifi 3 times) If I should continue to provide feedback reports, let me know, otherwise I will just keep an eye on updates to this thread.

be...@gmail.com <be...@gmail.com> #10Sep 13, 2018 12:48PM

I looked at 2 reports, in both case we see that the WiFi network service state is eventually changed to "failure".

Rerouting to WiFi component to take an initial look if this is a WiFi issue.

pe...@infogenius.com <pe...@infogenius.com> #11Sep 14, 2018 01:44AM

The 3 feedback reports:

ph...@gmail.com <ph...@gmail.com> #12Sep 22, 2018 03:58PM

The client device disconnected from wifi_psk_6 due to "no remaining endpoints", and disconnected from wifi_psk_8 due to reconnect timeout. The connection to wifi_psk_36 was unstable, link monitor failure occurred and PREV_AUTH_NOT_VALID error observed during reconnection.

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #13Sep 24, 2018 07:02PM

<tirage> Kevin to take a look, figure out if it is L2 or L3 issue.

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #14Sep 30, 2018 08:48AM

I am not sure if I can jump on this one, but I would like to add a log from our HP G9 MK EE editions that seem to have DNS check issues. We will be using the Chromebook and all of the sudden it disconnects from WIFI and then sometimes fails to reconnect other times reconnects fine. In this it starts at 2024-11-01T16:27:01.538619Z in the log. Suddenly DNS checks start failing and the CB is disconnected. This happens on all of our G9's randomly.

There are no issues seen on the firewall or with any other models of Chromebook at this same time. I also notice that instead of do53 query to DNS 9.9.9.9 its says Do53 query to (IPv4: 1) and (IPv4: 2) and fails.

Hope this is maybe related. Otherwise I can file my own report.

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #15Oct 2, 2018 03:13PM

Adding one more attachment that shows a similar issue at 2024-10-30T17:52:08.595534Z in the net.log file

mo...@brakestad.com <mo...@brakestad.com> #16Oct 12, 2018 12:44PM

deleted

re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #17Oct 24, 2018 06:49AM

I do not believe that this is an L2 layer issue. Indeed we see the Wi-Fi state reach "Failure" in all three feedback reports, but I believe that all three are explained by intended behavior. In https://listnr.corp.google.com/report/92062230053 the failure is shortly preceded by an indication of significant RSSI drop. (Internal-only link to sample log). This looks like the user walked away from their access point and lost connection.

In the other two reports, we see a pattern where the device suspends, resumes, then fails to reconnect to the AP is was connected to prior to the resume. This could be explained by the user closing their device, traveling out of range of their AP, then re-opening their device. (Internal-only link to sample log).

So, I believe the Wi-Fi failures are reflective of expected device behavior in response to user activity. I do believe there is some indication of L3 layer issues though. For example in http://listnr/product/208/report/92051793504 where we see repeated dnsproxyd errors while we are in the "online" state. (Internal-only link to sample log).

Handing this back to the networking team to take a look.

pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #18Oct 26, 2018 01:39PM

I do believe there is some indication of L3 layer issues though. For example in http://listnr/product/208/report/92051793504 where we see repeated dnsproxyd errors while we are in the "online" state.

As discussed many times internally, dns failures happen both because of link issues and L3 issues and therefore dns failures can't be used to rule out link issues. Actually dns health checks and dns queries are the first thing expected to fail when the link fails as a packet transport.

so...@caslco.com <so...@caslco.com> #19Oct 30, 2018 03:49AM

Added clarification from this user in response to #17: The device stays open, and unmoved during these occurrences. In most instances the device is in the same room as the access point. After sending the feedback reports, I typically restart the computer which will usually grant me access to the network for at least a little while. Hope that helps in clarifying conditions, feel free to ask for more information as needed.

hs...@gmail.com <hs...@gmail.com> #20Nov 20, 2018 08:09AM

Thanks all for the investigation and #19 for providing more information.

I took a quick pass at the 3 reports in #11, the DNS failures always came together with the NUD_FAILED logs, which means that the gateway was not reachable on L2. This usually means something went wrong on the network side (i.e., due to some reason the device did not get the ARP responses), but the weird thing is that, if I read the logs correctly, these 3 feedback reports are from 3 different networks, and the NUD_FAILED is shown on all the 3 networks...

Questions to the user:

Were you using the device at the same physical location to connect to these networks? (just want to rule out some random effect from the physical environment...)
If it's possible, could you try connecting the device to the same router(s) with Ethernet cable to see if it works? (this could help us understand if the issue is at the network layer or the wifi layer).

Questions to the wifi team:

In this case, will it be helpful to do some OTA packet capture?

Thanks!

kn...@gmail.com <kn...@gmail.com> #21Nov 20, 2018 11:14PM

Re #20 If I remember correctly 1 report was from my work connection, but I believe I submitted the other two in the same day on my home connection. I can connect by Ethernet cable later this evening to test at home. I can't promise conclusive results from just one session though, as the issue really doesn't seem to follow any kind of pattern of when it does and doesn't work... I can do this over the span of the rest of this week though if you think that would be more helpful. Do you want me to submit feedback reports while I am connected? Or only if the issue arises?

Thanks for all of y'all's help!

jn...@gmail.com <jn...@gmail.com> #22Nov 27, 2018 05:52AM

Re #21,

Do you want me to submit feedback reports while I am connected? Or only if the issue arises?

Only if the issue arises is fine. Thanks!

Re #14 and #15,

Sorry for the late reply -- I checked the two logs and they showed the same pattern -- there were a lot of NUD_FAILED in the logs. Not sure if the root cause is the same with #1 . Would you mind also filing a feedback report (alt-shift-i, and put "b/360530624" in the textbox so that we can search for it easily) when you are seeing it again (same instruction as in #3)? Thanks.

kn...@gmail.com <kn...@gmail.com> #23Nov 27, 2018 03:03PM

You may not know the answer to this, but usually I gather logs
remotely through the admin console when I notice the behaviour through our
Meraki wifi system. It has these couple options I can select when
collecting logs. Can I do it this way? or another way remotely. Hopefully
this picture comes through.

[image: image.png]

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 8:43 PM <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

--
Erik Jeffery
Brown Deer School District

--

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of
the original message.

de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #24Nov 27, 2018 07:09PM

Also, we are moving our HP MK G9 EE editions up to 130 from 129 and monitoring there. It is looking like maybe 130 fixes the issue for the majority of the time with some instances still happening at random times, but I don't want to speak to soon.

Would you like me to only gather logs on devices already updated to 130 that have this issue or do you want logs from 129 devices as well?

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #25Nov 29, 2018 04:41PM

Hello

I think this issue seems to be mostly taken care of with 130, but still seems to occur sporadically.

All of our clients are remote, so the best I can do is collect system logs through the admin console.

Here is a netlog.txt from a OS130 client that has this issue occur at 2024-11-12R13:44:49. Also, you can see this issue occurring for a much longer duration at timestamp - 2024-11-1120:37:50 There is no indication on the firewall that this client had any issues through us.

I have the entire support bundle if uploading that would provide more information.

Please let me know what I can do to help.

bi...@gmail.com <bi...@gmail.com> #26Dec 1, 2018 12:18PM

Re #23 ~ #25:

Thanks for the additional information (and sorry for the late reply).

Hopefully this picture comes through.

Unfortunately we can only see a [image: image.png] :)

I'll defer to Kevin to check if there are any other logs we can collect for better debugging. (Logs in #25 still shows the NUD_FAILED issue)

gl...@gmail.com <gl...@gmail.com> #27Dec 1, 2018 12:27PM

I am going to add these logs as well to see if they are any help. I do not see in these logs the same DNS issue, but this user has the same HP Chromebook 11MK G9 EE and experienced the disconnect issues at around 2024-11-12 18:44 or so. Hope these logs will show something interesting.

The computer was restarted at around 18:47 and you can see it connect right away.

Also, if you would rather have me create my own issue I can.

so...@gmail.com <so...@gmail.com> #28Dec 2, 2018 01:22AM

Hey,

I am going to upload one more netlog. This user is on Chrome OS 130 and is experiencing the issue multiple times of the day in multiple classrooms. It can be seen at timestamp 2024-11-18T17:40:58.026051Z

I have a log packet from the computer - Google Admin Console if needed/

Thanks

gr...@gmail.com <gr...@gmail.com> #29Dec 2, 2018 01:47AM

Thank you for all of the logs, this is very helpful in working towards a diagnosis. Here's what I've got so far:

We see a repeated pattern of failed authentication attempts in all of your recent log submissions. We attempt to authenticate, and a couple seconds later the attempt times out, seemingly without any response from the AP:

2024-11-12T18:43:53.297881Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[784]: nl80211: Authentication request send successfully
2024-11-12T18:43:53.298209Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[784]: nl80211: Drv Event 19 (NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION) received for wlan0
2024-11-12T18:43:53.298233Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[784]: nl80211: New station ea:9e:38:7f:e0:10
2024-11-12T18:43:53.311360Z INFO shill[1162]: INFO shill: [wifi.cc(2659)] WiFi wlan0 StateChanged inactive -> authenticating
2024-11-12T18:43:53.333510Z INFO patchpaneld[1974]: INFO patchpaneld: [shill_client.cc(262)] Service /service/1 was not connected
2024-11-12T18:43:53.338577Z INFO patchpaneld[1974]: INFO patchpaneld: [shill_client.cc(262)] Service /service/1 was not connected
2024-11-12T18:43:56.017781Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[784]: nl80211: Drv Event 20 (NL80211_CMD_DEL_STATION) received for wlan0
2024-11-12T18:43:56.017823Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[784]: nl80211: Delete station ea:9e:38:7f:e0:10
2024-11-12T18:43:58.299255Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[784]: wlan0: SME: Authentication timeout

One possibility is that the auth request was malformed in some way such that the AP didn't recognize it. Perhaps the device tried do authenticate using an unsupported method. Looking at the authentication request details, nothing stands out as erroneous. Another possibility is that the AP did send an authentication response, but that was somehow ignored by the device.

2024-11-19T14:02:00.401322Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: Starting radio work 'sme-connect'@0x580617abf0 after 0.040791 second wait
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401402Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: clearing own WPA/RSN IE
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401423Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: RSN: clearing own RSNXE
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401481Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: Automatic auth_alg selection: 0x1
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401510Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: SAE enabled, but target BSS does not advertise SAE AKM for RSN
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401533Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: RSN: PMKSA cache search - network_ctx=0x5806180fb0 try_opportunistic=0 akmp=0x0
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401548Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: RSN: Search for BSSID (MAC OUI=ea:9e:38 IFACE=8)
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401563Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: RSN: No PMKSA cache entry found
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401583Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: RSN: using IEEE 802.11i/D9.0
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401604Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: Selected cipher suites: group 16 pairwise 16 key_mgmt 2 proto 2
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401622Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: Selected mgmt group cipher 32
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401642Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: clearing AP WPA IE
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401670Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: WPA: set AP RSN IE - hexdump(len=22): 30 14 01 00 00 0f ac 04 01 00 00 0f ac 04 01 00 00 0f ac 02 00 00
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401687Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: clearing AP RSNXE
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401707Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: AP group 0x10 network profile group 0x358 driver supported ciphers 0x381e; available group 0x10
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401726Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: using GTK CCMP
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401747Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: AP pairwise 0x10 network profile pairwise 0x358 driver supported ciphers 0x381e; available pairwise 0x10
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401766Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: using PTK CCMP
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401786Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: AP key_mgmt 0x2 network profile key_mgmt 0xc000d42; available key_mgmt 0x2
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401804Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: using KEY_MGMT WPA-PSK
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401825Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: AP mgmt_group_cipher 0x20 network profile mgmt_group_cipher 0x0; available mgmt_group_cipher 0x0
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401844Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: WPA: not using MGMT group cipher
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401874Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: WPA: Set own WPA IE default - hexdump(len=22): 30 14 01 00 00 0f ac 04 01 00 00 0f ac 04 01 00 00 0f ac 02 8c 00
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401889Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: RSN: Set own RSNXE default - hexdump(len=0):
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401903Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: WPA: Set PMK based on external data - hexdump(len=32): [REMOVED]
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401951Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: RRM: Determining whether RRM can be used - device support: 0x30
2024-11-19T14:02:00.401966Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: RRM: Adding RRM IE to Association Request
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402027Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: Added supported operating classes IE - hexdump(len=24): 3b 16 79 51 53 54 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f 80 81 00 82 80
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402050Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: EAPOL: External notification - EAP success=0
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402070Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: EAPOL: External notification - EAP fail=0
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402084Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: EAPOL: External notification - portControl=Auto
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402101Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: Cancelling scan request
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402170Z NOTICE wpa_supplicant[800]: SME: Trying to authenticate with (MAC OUI=ea:9e:38 IFACE=8) (SSID='(SSID: 1)' freq=5680 MHz)
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402194Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402213Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: State: SCANNING -> AUTHENTICATING
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402253Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: Determining shared radio frequencies (max len 2)
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402276Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: wlan0: Shared frequencies (len=0): completed iteration
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402301Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 81
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402321Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=11): 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402335Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 115
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402350Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=4): 24 28 2c 30
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402363Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 116
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402378Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=2): 24 2c
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402391Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 117
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402405Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=2): 28 30
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402420Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 124
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402457Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=4): 95 99 9d a1
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402471Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 125
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402488Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=5): 95 99 9d a1 a5
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402502Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 126
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402516Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=2): 95 9d
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402529Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 127
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402544Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=2): 99 a1
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402558Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 128
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402584Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=8): 24 28 2c 30 95 99 9d a1
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402611Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Add operating class 130
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402632Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Channels - hexdump(len=9): 24 28 2c 30 95 99 9d a1 a5
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402649Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: Update channel list
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402697Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: channels: 81:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 115:36,40,44,48 116:36,44 117:40,48 124:149,153,157,161 125:149,153,157,161,165 126:149,157 127:153,161 128:36,40,44,48,149,153,157,161 130:36,40,44,48,149,153,157,161,165
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402716Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: P2P: cli_channels:
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402749Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]: nl80211: Authenticate (ifindex=2)
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402844Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]:   * bssid=(MAC OUI=ea:9e:38 IFACE=8)
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402859Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]:   * freq=5680
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402900Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]:   * SSID=649433bbcd6b
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402914Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]:   * IEs - hexdump(len=0): [NULL]
2024-11-19T14:02:00.402927Z DEBUG wpa_supplicant[800]:   * Auth Type 0

Another possibility is that the AP did send an authentication response, but that was somehow ignored by the device. Unfortunately, none of these possibilities are observable in the limited logs that we have. Really, we're going to need additional information to actually make a diagnosis, since there isn't anything conclusive in the device logs.

ejeffery, if you're able to provide some additional diagnostics, it could go a long way to helping understand the behavior. Here are some things that would help me debug, listed in order of usefulness. I understand that you might not be able to complete some or all of these steps, but anything you can provide could be useful.

An OTA packet capture on the AP's operating frequency, showing a reproduction of the event. This is definitely an advanced step that requires additional hardware so no worries if this isn't viable, but it's certainly the most useful option.
Logs from the AP that you're trying to connect to. This could potentially inform me of misalignment between the Chromebook and AP.
A full feedback report from the Chromebook, gathered using Alt-Shift-I immediately after a failure. Feedback reports contain additional logs and information that isn't available in the net logs.

If you're able to complete items 1 or 2, it would still be really helpful if you could provide an accompanying feedback report that lines up with the packet capture or AP logs.

Let me know if you're able to provide any of this additional information. Thanks again for working with us to help diagnose this issue.

Best, Kevin

he...@gmail.com <he...@gmail.com> #30Dec 2, 2018 04:05PM

Hello,

1. I can try to do this. It would be like a monitor mode capture? I can try but most of the time it isn't necessarily happening when I am around. I just hear about it later with the time stamps.

2. One of the problems here is that we use Meraki APs. Don't have a lot in logging capabilities. I can attach some screenshots of dashboards here if you want.

3. Is there any specific logs you need. I usually do not get to see the user in person and must rely on log gathering from the admin console, but I can get a support bundle from there and upload any logs you may need if you want. That is where I got the netlog.txt from.

Thanks very much for helping me with this.

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #31Dec 6, 2018 08:43PM

In addition I started looking at some of the other logs I have access to from the CB and I am going to uplopad the messages log - in it I see some references to kernel warnings that appear to be releated to the wifi chip - Atheros. You can see an example at timestamp - 2024-11-18T14:33:12.873027Z.

Does this help at all?

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #32Dec 9, 2018 05:04PM

Sorry for the multiple messages but I am going to attach a log packet that I currently have. These are the basic logs that that get sent into the admin console. I can pull a much more detailed log set on demand that includes the following logs. See Attached Screenshots:

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #33Dec 18, 2018 08:15PM

Sorry again. Wanted to mention when I export the logs in the pngs I have these options to export if this helps? See Attachment:

vl...@gmail.com <vl...@gmail.com> #34Dec 27, 2018 05:24AM

Has there been any development on a fix to these issues?

dd...@gmail.com <dd...@gmail.com> #35Dec 28, 2018 10:57AM

Please keep this feature.

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #36Jan 7, 2019 12:34AM

Please keep this feature.

cr...@gmail.com <cr...@gmail.com> #37Jan 8, 2019 05:58AM

Please keep this feature! Seriously, it IS the reason I love GTasks. No other app offers this as well as GTasks does. I finally found a solution that works perfectly for me, but now it might not be available. I sincerely hope it stays!!!

re...@tothepenny.biz <re...@tothepenny.biz> #38Jan 8, 2019 06:04AM

I use this feature on a daily basis, multiple times a day. Even a small price increase to support it would be worth it to me. it would be so disheartening to see it discontinued. Please keep supporting it.

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #39Jan 8, 2019 07:30AM

Please keep multiple levels.

jn...@gmail.com <jn...@gmail.com> #40Jan 8, 2019 07:48AM

Please keep this wonderful unique feature. Thanks.

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #41Jan 10, 2019 02:59PM

This is the only reason why I use Google Tasks. It is the best way to organize my To-Do lists. Please keep supporting it.

pu...@gmail.com <pu...@gmail.com> #42Jan 12, 2019 05:40PM

This is the only reason why I use Google Tasks. It is the best way to organize my To-Do lists. Please keep supporting it.

ct...@gmail.com <ct...@gmail.com> #43Jan 13, 2019 10:53PM

Task lists are much more useful with multi-level subtasks. Please keep supporting them.

ls...@gmail.com <ls...@gmail.com> #44Jan 14, 2019 07:29PM

This is the only reason why I use Google Tasks. It is the best way to organize my To-Do lists. Please keep supporting it.

pr...@tcsne.org <pr...@tcsne.org> #45Jan 17, 2019 03:20PM

PLEASE Keep the support of multiple level of sub tasks. I absolutely need them for my job. #1 most useful feature you have.

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #46Jan 23, 2019 01:39AM

Keep multiple levels of subtasks, please!

hy...@gmail.com <hy...@gmail.com> #47Jan 24, 2019 12:58AM

Please retain multiple levels of subtasks! Multiple levels and the easy method of movement and ordering supports my style of thinking. I would be lost without them.

ys...@gmail.com <ys...@gmail.com> #48Jan 28, 2019 04:27AM

PLEASE Keep the support of multiple level of sub tasks. I absolutely need them for my job. #1 most useful feature you have.

yi...@gmail.com <yi...@gmail.com> #49Jan 31, 2019 09:23PM

I've been using good tasks for a long time and very happy about the sub tasks. I don't understand why Google will want to take this feature out of the scene. I vote for keeping the feature! Otherwise, I'll be switching to another app.

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #50Feb 5, 2019 04:14PM

Please do not remove the support for multiple levels of sub tasks from the task API. I'm using gTask for Desktop and it's the only app I've found that includes this functionality in an intuitive way.

ma...@briody.net <ma...@briody.net> #51Feb 6, 2019 08:35AM

Why do Google insist on removing things that are useful - for no good reason. Please leave this alone!

te...@googlemail.com <te...@googlemail.com> #52Feb 6, 2019 08:44AM

Multiple level of subtasks is a very very useful feature, basically the easiest way to clearify and build a hierarchy. Please don't remove it.

sl...@gmail.com <sl...@gmail.com> #53Feb 6, 2019 06:48PM

Multi-level sub-task is a killer feature of Google Tasks. Instead of removing it, introduce folding!

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #54Feb 6, 2019 07:57PM

Absolutely, must keep multi-level sub-tasks!! I have thousands of tasks stacked for better organization - it's a great feature! Without it, I will have to switch and will no longer use Google Tasks!

gg...@gmail.com <gg...@gmail.com> #55Feb 7, 2019 08:39AM

Please keep multi-level tasks! It is absolute necessary for proper organizing!
Also keep finalized tasks in the task list until I remove them manually.

je...@gmail.com <je...@gmail.com> #56Feb 8, 2019 03:16PM

Please keep multi-level tasks!
Also, keep completed tasks in the list until removed manually.
Also, please allow full screen view of tasks (like Google Tasks Canvas allows)
Also, add functionality for repeating tasks daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly.

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #57Feb 11, 2019 01:53AM

Please keep multi-level tasks.
Also, please add these other functionalities for tasks.
1. Reoccurring tasks monthy, yearly etc.
2. Alarm and reminder feature.
3. Able to view all tasks for the day so that we no longer need to switch from one category to the other

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #58Feb 12, 2019 01:39AM

I believe Google Tasks Canvas is the single most important productivity tool that I use. Please keep supporting it as well as the multiple levels of sub tasks necessary to maintain existing functionality in Gtasks.

si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #59Feb 13, 2019 07:55PM

Tasks Canvas and multiple level tasks are what sets your product apart. Without them, I will be forced to find another solution. Please keep them!
Thank you!

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #60Feb 19, 2019 12:12AM

Please keep the support for multiple task levels.

jf...@gmail.com <jf...@gmail.com> #61Feb 19, 2019 09:24PM

Indeed, please keep the support of multiple level of sub tasks - it's the #1 feature in Google Tasks for me.

dm...@juno.com <dm...@juno.com> #62Feb 20, 2019 02:10PM

So sorry to hear that GTask functionality will soon be lost. Why?

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #63Feb 20, 2019 08:38PM

Please please please keep the multi level tasks! (And please keep canvas!!)

si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #64Feb 27, 2019 02:07PM

Please, keep the multi level tasks for gtask. It is one of your great products!

si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #65Feb 27, 2019 02:09PM

The multi level tasks in gtask is a diferencial that you have in similar app. Please keep the support!

mc...@geek.net.ru <mc...@geek.net.ru> #66Feb 28, 2019 03:56PM

There is no actual substitute for Tasks Canvas for its simplicity, ease of use and product/market fit. Whoever created it - is a really bright person, who could fit the feature set to what the actual user needs. I would not really shut it down just to teach newcomer product managers on how to make great products people really use and love.

vo...@gmail.com <vo...@gmail.com> #67Feb 28, 2019 04:18PM

for the last weeks I've been frantically trying every alternative, there is
nothing like Google canvas, please pretty please don't turn it off :((((

you will break my tiny little heart..

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 16:56 <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

vh...@gmail.com <vh...@gmail.com> #68Mar 1, 2019 02:41AM

keep that suport. don't take it away

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #69Mar 6, 2019 10:46AM

Please please please keep the multi level tasks! (And please keep canvas!!)

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #70Mar 7, 2019 05:41PM

You are Google. If there is some reason that multiple level tasks is an issue; fix it. A lot of users, obviously, have paid money for the app just for the sole purpose of having this feature. By eliminating it you not only to you indirectly waste all those users' money but you also limit the app provider's ability to generate profit. As we all know profit is what keeps mouths fed and company doors open. No disrespect intended but I'm sure it is something the shareholders of Google know very well.
Please work something out, gtasks is a small part of how I generate profit and you do as well.
Even your product, Google Tasks, can't compete or ....... have I just discovered something .....

hi...@gmail.com <hi...@gmail.com> #71Mar 16, 2019 11:59AM

Please keep multi-level tasks, and please keep canvas!

pe...@gmail.com <pe...@gmail.com> #72Mar 17, 2019 10:49AM

vo...@gmail.com <vo...@gmail.com> #73Mar 17, 2019 02:03PM

could you perhaps release the old source code, so someone could make it into a self hosted task list?

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #74Mar 17, 2019 05:59PM

Comment 66 put it best:

"There is no actual substitute for Tasks Canvas for its simplicity, ease of use and product/market fit....I would not really shut it down just to teach newcomer product managers on how to make great products people really use and love."

Please continue to support the Tasks Canvas view. Thank you.

ho...@gmail.com <ho...@gmail.com> #75Mar 23, 2019 06:20PM

Please keep multi-level tasks, and please keep canvas!

li...@gmail.com <li...@gmail.com> #76Mar 25, 2019 02:00PM

Pity, too bad, too bad! I already have stocks of Alphabet and had actually decided to top up my portfolio. But now, when Goolge starts cutting off features that are a unique selling point, I'll think twice about that.

no...@gmail.com <no...@gmail.com> #77Mar 28, 2019 06:29PM

It is not understandable at all why Google restricts the sub tasks level without any reason.
Even simple shopping task lists like e.g.

Shopping
- Shop 1
-- Item 1
-- Item 2
-- Item 3
- Shop 2
-- Item 1
-- Item 2

already require two sub levels.
Without a certain number of sub levels, Google tasks is not really usable anymore.

Please keep the possibility to add sub levels!

ap...@gmail.com <ap...@gmail.com> #78Mar 28, 2019 10:13PM

Please keep the multiple level subtasks. They are extremely useful.

ol...@gmail.com <ol...@gmail.com> #79Apr 2, 2019 06:02AM

I cannot access the Gtasks Canvas by today.

Here are the actions I take:

1.
i. On the web: I use Gtaskd as an alternative interface to canvas:

https://tasks.gtaskd.com
ii.On android: Keep using Gtasks App:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.dayup.gtask

2.DON'T Press the [Update List] button on the New Google Tasks. It will ruin all your subtasks hierarchy.

3.Backup all my current tasks as a CSV using:

https://tasks-backup.appspot.com/ and pray for the coming back of multiple level subtasks.

bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #80Apr 3, 2019 09:31AM

The reason I use Google Tasks is because of the sub levels and the easy

https://mail.google.com/tasks single page interface. I will look for an alternative tasks program

be...@bhague.com <be...@bhague.com> #81Apr 3, 2019 02:53PM

sub levels are important and full screen support is as well. I use tasks for many different things and now I cannot see the entire task because the viewing area is too small. this sucks!

na...@makhijani.org <na...@makhijani.org> #82Apr 3, 2019 03:24PM

I have tried many other task applications and nothing beats the simple canvas interface of Google tasks. Besides the sub tasks issue, having it integrated into mail and calendar makes it highly usable since I prefer to have a small side window open with Google Tasks while I'm working on other windows.

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #83Apr 3, 2019 10:11PM

Please continue to support Google Tasks Canvas view. I have relied on it for years, and cannot find a suitable substitute. Please reconsider shutting it down. Thank you.

gm...@gmail.com <gm...@gmail.com> #84Apr 3, 2019 11:27PM

Lack of Canvas (or some full screen task screen) will have me looking for other list software. My work environment dictates the mail and calendar app I use, so a panel on the side of an used application in efficient and a motivation to find an alternative. Google has been shutting down other links like /ig and /m throughout the day.

pb...@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com> #85Apr 4, 2019 08:38AM

Yes this is so annoying. I really miss the Canvas from which gave a good overview.

Google, please re-insert the Print and Canvas features and find a solution to this issue.

My task list with a lot of important tasks is now more or less impossible to use.

/Patrik :-(

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #86Apr 4, 2019 10:14AM

please keep it as is!!! need canvas and sub tasks!!!

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #87Apr 4, 2019 01:22PM

Multiple subtask levels are a must. Please keep this feature.

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #88Apr 4, 2019 06:24PM

Multiple subtask levels and a full screen view are a must. Please keep this feature

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #89Apr 4, 2019 06:52PM

Multiple subtask levels and full screen summary made Canvas tasks a great utility.
Why remove it when its upkeep must be a minute drop in your your massive ocean of cash?

pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #90Apr 4, 2019 07:40PM

I need to look at my old task list to copy it, where did it go?

s....@alumni.ethz.ch <s....@alumni.ethz.ch> #91Apr 4, 2019 08:33PM

I worked with google task for years. Multiple subtask levels and a full screen view are a must. Please keep this feature

ke...@gtaskd.com <ke...@gtaskd.com> #92Apr 4, 2019 09:18PM

The thing that sets Google Tasks apart from every other to-do list software I've seen is the fact that it has unlimited nesting. This allows users to make a project as simple or complex as it needs to be, and if that changes over time for a given project, Google Tasks grows with it. It's beauty is in its simplicity.

The new UIs launched by Google in 2018 work just fine without this change to the API. Aside from building the API in 2011, Google didn't make any in-house changes to Google Tasks until 2018, even after saying it was on their list in 2011:

https://gmail.googleblog.com/2011/01/top-tasks-for-google-tasks.html . At least the most important task on the list of five bullets—building the API—got done.

The API allowed other developers to keep your product relevant in the era of smartphone with apps like the excellent GTasks for Android:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.dayup.gtask . Dumbing down the UI for the masses I can understand, but there's no sense in breaking the API for the developers that actually paid attention to Google Tasks in the 7 years Google didn't, and the users that have come to rely on those apps.

Canvas is gone, and I understand that your vision for Google Tasks if far different from mine, but there's no reason to break the API with this change when your new UIs already work with it.

Kevin

an...@schegg.org <an...@schegg.org> #93Apr 4, 2019 09:26PM

Another vote to restore canvas. The compactness of the lines (number of tasks per screen page) as well as the wider page width are both important features of canvas that the current Tasks lacks. The ability to control when completed tasks were removed from the list was also a nice feature of tasks' canvas.

gr...@gmail.com <gr...@gmail.com> #94Apr 5, 2019 03:21AM

Restore the full screen mode. I'm trying to select and copy all my tasks at once and there's no way to do this now. Dumb, infuriating move Google.

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #95Apr 5, 2019 08:35AM

please bring back the full screen mode. The current UI does not work for 50+ tasks (search, re-arrange order, move sub-tasks). I do have 100+ tasks :-|

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #96Apr 5, 2019 06:42PM

Extremely unhappy at loss of full screen and multi-level tasks. I can't
convert my stuff over or it will lose all meaning condensed to only two
task levels. Also, Gtasks will no longer synchronize, so I can't use that
iOS app any more, or the desktop version. After looking at about 10 other
programs I am switching to Quire. It supports infinite task levels and has
a lot of nice features. The migration is not too too bad either. Use the
backup function at

https://tasks-backup.appspot.com/. I unchecked all the
boxes for completed tasks, hidden tasks, etc., cuz they will clog up your
new lists in Quire. Export as a spaced text file. Then just open the file,
select the text for each project/task group (use ctrl click then shift
click to select), copy, and go to Quire. In Quire, you create a new project
(eg House Projects) to match your old one, add one task, then right click
the task, select More, then Paste. Do that for each project (I have about
20!) and you're done. Be careful when selecting text that you get all of
the spaces before the first task, or else it will become the parent and
everything else will be a subtask! They explain more about migration
here:

https://quire.io/blog/p/How-to-migrate-to-Quire-Copy-and-paste.html
There are a few simple things to learn when you get started, such as
Ctl-arrow to collapse or expand each list, but it looks pretty good so far.

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:35 AM <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #97Apr 6, 2019 03:46PM

I am another user whose task lists need full screen and multi-level subtasks. Thanks to the user who mentioned Quire. I have moved all my tasks to Quire. My hope is that Google will someday make the new tasks as good as the canvas based tasks.

ks...@gmail.com <ks...@gmail.com> #98Apr 7, 2019 12:32AM

I agree with this.

ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #99Apr 7, 2019 10:11AM

I agree

et...@gmail.com <et...@gmail.com> #100Apr 7, 2019 11:54PM

Please keep multi-level nested sub-tasks.

in...@gmail.com <in...@gmail.com> #101Apr 8, 2019 03:03PM

PLEASSSEEE keep multiple levels of sub tasks!!! Tasks are almost useless without it :(

[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #102Apr 8, 2019 10:20PM

Please keep this feature. It's CLEARLY being used and requested by people, and it's already coded and functional. If it's really such an issue to recode it, most of the people even on this thread alone would be happy to contribute. Either way, it's a vital feature. Please don't remove it :'(
Thanks

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #103Apr 9, 2019 01:12PM

Please keep this feature.

ni...@bubblevision.com <ni...@bubblevision.com> #104Apr 11, 2019 07:41AM

I'm also saddened by the loss of the Canvas view. The tasks list on desktop is now ridiculously narrow and vertically spaced out. Since the Google Tasks canvas view was finally deprecated, the Better Google Tasks extensions for Chrome and Firefox no longer work either. The button literally just takes you to the GSuite Learning Center for Google Tasks. I hope someone turns their attention to writing a css style for the Stylish browser extension (see

userstyles.org) so at least the Tasks list is wider and more compact. Shouldn't be too difficult for someone good at css.

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #105Apr 11, 2019 09:43PM

Just switch to GTaskD and get things done. (it's amazing)

https://tasks.gtaskd.com

Also a Stylus (who still uses Stylish?) style here to make it look more like Canvas...

https://userstyles.org/styles/170632/dark-gtaskd-by-keystoneclimber

ko...@gmail.com <ko...@gmail.com> #106Apr 12, 2019 07:30AM

Please keep this feature.

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #107Apr 12, 2019 09:09PM

Even if you do not support multi level tasks within your own Tasks App, please don't take the feature away from all the other Apps using the API. A lot of users and developers use multilevel tasks via the API. Just leave it as it is!

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #108Apr 12, 2019 09:17PM

I use Android Outliner synchronizing with Google Tasks. And I certainly use multiple levels. Tasks do not make sense for me with just two levels. Please don't drop this feature!

tu...@gmail.com <tu...@gmail.com> #109Apr 13, 2019 06:13PM

Task is not usable any more now! Please, make a more friendly and flexible interface, like the classic canvas!

ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #110Apr 15, 2019 07:41PM

Status: Won't Fix (Infeasible)

Thanks everyone for your feedback, it's clear that you are passionate about the Google Tasks product. Unfortuantely the API cannot support a feature that the Tasks UI does not, and the product team has made the decision to only support one level of sub-tasks. I'll pass your on to the product team but I think it's very unliklely that this design decision will be reversed.

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #111Apr 15, 2019 08:00PM

"the API cannot support a feature that the Tasks UI does not..." In what reality do you live? It's called backwards compatibility and its something that is done in software development around the world, on a daily basis. I think what you mean to say is "Google refuses to include an API feature that is not utilized by the new overly simplistic Tasks UI because we are all knowing and hence, know what is best for you"

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #112Apr 15, 2019 08:07PM

"the API cannot support a feature that the Tasks UI does not..." In fact this is the current status quo. The API is supporting multiple level of sub tasks at the moment while the Task UI is not and all we want is to keep this status quo and not to remove this feature from the API.

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #113Apr 15, 2019 08:11PM

In addition, if you talk to the product team about this issue please point out clearly that they are about to remove a unique feature that makes the differences better GTasks and all the other task managers out there.

ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #114Apr 15, 2019 08:20PM

My apologies, I didn't fully understand the current state of affairs. It appears that for now the API does still support multiple levels of tasks, but the Tasks sidebar UI won't display those tasks unless you collapse the levels first. This isn't a great user experience, and I think this change to the API is to ensure that in the future all tasks are compatible with the UI.

Fundamentally this API is built to allow applications to integrate with Google Tasks. If Google Tasks no longer supports multiple levels of tasks then I think it's reasonable for the API to reflect that change. If your application doesn't care if a user can't access their tasks in the Google Tasks UI then it's probably better to implement your own backend for storing tasks instead of reusing the Tasks API for that purpose.

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #115Apr 15, 2019 08:43PM

Well, basically you say that the API shall alwas reflect the current features of the Task UI, if this is true can you please explain to me, for instance, why you have introduced the due date time feature and the repeat setting into the Task UI and not in the API? Have a look to this issue

https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/129591245. Why is it OK for the user experience to have different feature sets in one case but in the other case it is not?

By the way, in my option the best solution would be to keep the support of multiple level of sub tasks in both, the Task UI and the API cause I thing that there are a lot of people that like this feature and it is very hard to understand why you want to remove it at all.

ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #116Apr 15, 2019 08:55PM

I agree that issue #129591245 is a bug, and I've confirmed as much earlier today. The API should always be compatible with the UI, and should strive to expose all of the same functionality as the UI (although in practice full parity is rarely achieved).

It's completely valid to have an opinion on whether or not the removal of multiple levels of tasks was good for the product, but as mentioned earlier that's outside the scope of this issue tracker.

vo...@gmail.com <vo...@gmail.com> #117Apr 16, 2019 12:16PM

i don't understand why you would take a perfect that is objectively great,
used by many people, required no updating (perfect the way it was) and make
it objectively worse, by reducing functionality. if you wanted a simple
tasks list why not just make one? why destroy a good thing that has been
working so well all along?

it's very disappointing :(

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019, 22:55 <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

jo...@buettgenwetekam.de <jo...@buettgenwetekam.de> #118Apr 19, 2019 10:17PM

It's fantastic: now many users are forced to look fo another solution and google will loose some cutsomer and their information ... bad idea for google but a chance for other developer!

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #119Apr 20, 2019 12:00AM

Check out Quire. I've been using it for 2-3 weeks now and no real letdowns
vs. the old Google Tasks, and it does have some nicer features (and is
free). If you search for my earlier posting on this thread you'll see how
to transition. Also, to see the "notes" associated with each task, click
the double arrows at the right of the screen to open the detail panel.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:17 PM <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

li...@gmail.com <li...@gmail.com> #120Apr 21, 2019 12:08AM

I was a long time user of Google Tasks...loved the sub sub tasks. Now moving off that & will check out Quire or Workflowy.

pi...@gmail.com <pi...@gmail.com> #121Apr 21, 2019 03:47PM

Stop breaking useful things. Your clunky modern interfaces are hot garbage. I WILL NOT COMPLY. I will go back to using pen and paper before using the atrocity your design team has forced on us.

BRING BACK CLASSIC TASKS. LEAVE SPACE FOR SIMPLE TOOLS. ...your current team isn't creating anything useful... only breaking things they don't understand.

wo...@gmail.com <wo...@gmail.com> #122Apr 21, 2019 11:20PM

What's really sad is that Google ignores suggestions and bugtrackers
anyway.
From past experience, these public forums are totally ignored by the
development and support teams and all they usually just do their own things.

Remember, unless Google can monetarise a product, they wont continue it.
Remember Google+, Picasa, Gmail, Inbox etc?
Their replacements (or UI redesign) are not even vague useful to power
users.

I'm an educator with students now working with Google. They tell me the
people in charge only like shiny new things. Old boring stable isn't worth
it.
The simplicity of the Google search page is only kept because of the CEO's
nostalgia ...

On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 01:47, <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

rn...@gmail.com <rn...@gmail.com> #123Apr 22, 2019 03:05PM

Please keep nested sub-tasks. They are integral to my Google Tasks usage.

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #124Apr 22, 2019 03:09PM

Isn't it enough that you killed the Canvas Interface! At least leave what is left alone!

Thanks

ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #125Apr 22, 2019 03:10PM

We've been using Tasks for years, it's difficult to migrate thousands of tasks. Why not just keep the nested sub-tasks if there are long-time users that can still make use of them?

kb...@gmail.com <kb...@gmail.com> #126Apr 22, 2019 03:34PM

I've used outline managers and task managers for decades. Asksam, Maxthink and Ecco Pro were the best.
Finding Google Canvas was great. In an age of declining user interface functionality over edginess (including Google's!) it was actually useful and did what was necessary.
Cancvas and search are the only Google apps I care about.

Please bring Canvas back and don't cripple the tasks API by compromising use of subtasks.
It isn't useful if you can't complete documenting the thoughts/dependencies for a topic because you can't add a subtask.

Whoever is making your user interface decisions is certainly failing to deliver products that are useful to people who use computers to accomplish something rather than just for entertainment. Further they deprive users of the opportunity to learn what a good tool is or to be able to associate that with Google.

In summary, please continue to support Tasks Canvas view and multi level subtasks. Thank you.

Message last modified on Apr 22, 2019 04:06PM

cr...@noaa.gov <cr...@noaa.gov> #127Apr 22, 2019 03:53PM

Please keep supporting nested sub-tasks. Google tasks is an important product that I hope is not further degraded.

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #128Apr 22, 2019 04:00PM

The reason that so many people are passionate about this is because people use nested subtasks. Please figure out a way to keep supporting this functionality.

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #129Apr 22, 2019 04:17PM

Please keep nested sub-tasks!

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #130Apr 22, 2019 04:23PM

The recent decision by Google to - well, frankly, to dumb-down the web interface for Tasks - makes it even more important that a robust API continue to exist, to support third party applications providing a fully-functional access to Google Tasks. Please keep nested sub-tasks as part of the API.

jc...@gmail.com <jc...@gmail.com> #131Apr 22, 2019 05:11PM

Keep the support of multiple levels of sub tasks. Multiple level sub task are critical to my use of this Task Manager App. Task managers without multi levels are of little use for life management and project managers are an over kill for task management. Please keep the current multiple level sub task structure.
jcpease@gmail.com

ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #132Apr 22, 2019 05:25PM

The only reason I use GTasks is nested tasks. If you want to remove support of nested tasks, then you can just remove GTasks. Otherwise, you can make it optional.

kr...@gmail.com <kr...@gmail.com> #133Apr 22, 2019 05:27PM

Please keep supporting nested sub-tasks. Why killing something that already works?

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #134Apr 22, 2019 06:54PM

Please keep supporting nested sub-tasks! They are essential to my tasks organization!

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #135Apr 22, 2019 07:26PM

Please keep supporting nested sub-tasks. They are really and very
essential to my tasks organization!

sw...@gmail.com <sw...@gmail.com> #136Apr 22, 2019 07:58PM

I was so disappointed when the canvas feature of tasks was removed. My life was organized around that feature. The existing task feature does not fill all of my needs but at least I am able to create 1 level of sub tasks. Now I hear that this feature will also be removed. DO NOT remove sub-tasks!!!! Or at least keep the multiple levels of sub tasks in the API so the talented non-google freelancers who have created very effected versions of Tasks can continue offering to those of us who appreciate, need and use multiple sub-task levels.

pi...@gmail.com <pi...@gmail.com> #137Apr 22, 2019 08:04PM

Did the A+ software engineers hire B and C people who eventually hired
D-level tech support people from the subcontinent?
...because the Google experience now feels like I am talking to a
D-level tech support person who doesn't get paid enough to care.

On 4/22/19, buganizer-system@google.com <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

--

· · · —
We love because he first loved us.
--1 John 4:19

re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #138Apr 22, 2019 09:08PM

Please do not remove sub-tasks! I've used it with hundreds (?thousands?) of tasks and totally depend on it for organizing how I get things done.

by...@gmail.com <by...@gmail.com> #139Apr 22, 2019 09:12PM

Canvas was a great simple and effective tool. Why kill it? Complex life and work requires more than only 2 levels.

Please bring back multi-level sub tasks! (and list order).

sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #140Apr 22, 2019 09:16PM

I have about a thousand tasks in my list and go as far as 5 levels deep. The ability to have sublevels that deep is unique among everything I have been able to research. Through a 3rd party app, I've used this on my Android for 7 years. If you remove this, I would miss the outlining that this allows and would succumb to whatever Microsoft crud my business encourages me to use.

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #141Apr 22, 2019 09:43PM

Please bring back nested sub-levels!!

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #142Apr 22, 2019 09:51PM

Please retain nested sub-tasks! I rely on this for my daily organisation.

ri...@gmail.com <ri...@gmail.com> #143Apr 23, 2019 12:20AM

I echo what Kevin (#92) says. It is evident that the feature is necessary for realistic organization and recording of tasks. Although the alternative is to create a separate task list, this has its disadvantages. One, creating entirely separate lists only adds in one additional layer to organize tasks, and additional layers will be difficult to add without either having a very large amount of lists or a large amount of undistinguished tasks in each list. Two, this destroys the ease of working with multiple sub-tasks in one list. Although creating another list and copying and pasting over certain tasks takes only two seconds, eventually, the buildup of lists, having to search for the correct list, or disorganized tasks within a list will lose even more time and damage productivity.

Although simplicity is the goal of the new UI, do not let this impact the hidden API functionality, and impact the numerous third-party applications that rely on this API. Do not let this impact all the users who have already commented and countless more who currently use multiple sub-tasks and, to the best of my knowledge, will have all of this organization destroyed come August. Don't underestimate the power that comes with having hierarchy, as I'm sure your very large team at Google understands well. And while it is uncomfortable to have features that are absent from the main app, and requires detection of sub-sub-tasks so the "error" message can be displayed, I believe the level of productivity kept and gained by having nested sub-tasks far exceeds this inconsistency.

A suggestion for past and future commenters: Attach screenshots of your tasks, that you are willing to share, and how your nested sub-tasks help your organization and workflow. Pictures can help show the impact of this feature to you that your words cannot convey. The paperclip button is right next to the "Add Comment" one.

lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #144Apr 23, 2019 04:40AM

Google has already royally f***ed up Gtasks by replacing the fully functional interface with the b*stardized and virtually useless sidebar version. Why take something that was virtually flawless and completely destroy it? What's the gain here?

de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #145Apr 23, 2019 04:57AM

Agreed with all said, particularly

comment #144

. Two things were missing from canvas view: (a) collapsible tasks (or outline view, or whatever you want to call it), and (b) search (yes, search, Google). Now, not only are these never going to be implemented, but the whole thing looks like it's going to be destroyed. What will be the essential difference between the future Tasks and Keep? Answer: the color scheme (this is *not* a joke). Well done to the Google devs for forward thinking (not). This is madness.

ra...@suchys.com <ra...@suchys.com> #146Apr 23, 2019 07:06AM

I just don't get it, why would Google release the "enhanced" version of Tasks (which I admit looks pretty) and deprecate the most powerful single feature? There must be a reason? So many great GUIs have been emasculated by revisionist designers: SONOS (destroyed simplicity for social hooks), Acrobat (bloat), Windows (too many to count). PLEASE Google don't wreck what already works!!! Please reconsider restoring sub-tasks or at least maintaining in the API.

an...@adeyko.com <an...@adeyko.com> #147Apr 23, 2019 09:06AM

Give it back to us please

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #148Apr 23, 2019 09:18AM

Why destroy something as beautiful as the old canvas + nested subtasks? Please give it back!

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #149Apr 23, 2019 09:23AM

I agree with others, Google should continue to support multiple sublevels within tasks.

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #150Apr 23, 2019 10:44AM

Nested sub-tasks is such a useful feature. Please don't remove it.

91...@gmail.com <91...@gmail.com> #151Apr 23, 2019 12:45PM

sub tasks and nested subtasks are very important please keep them in google tasks!

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #152Apr 23, 2019 01:50PM

Nested sub-tasks are useful for organization and prioritization. Please don't drop them!!

su...@videogamerepairs.ca <su...@videogamerepairs.ca> #153Apr 23, 2019 03:06PM

save nested tasks!

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #154Apr 23, 2019 09:53PM

Please bring back multiple levels of sub tasks, it is the only reason Google Task beats many other tools for small and bigger proyects!! Consider the many many people which work depends on Google Tasks linked outlining application!!

cc...@gmail.com <cc...@gmail.com> #155Apr 23, 2019 09:54PM

I would also like to request that multiple layers of tasks be retained in Tasks, if only in the API. Ideally, though, they would be retained for everyone, and a full page Canvas view should be returned. The current UI is only sufficient for the simplest of planning. There is no birds-eye view, list names are not even alphabetical, completed items are moved to the bottom and are no longer in context. The Keep app is similarly difficult to use via the sidebar, but currently can be opened in its own page view in a new tab. It would be great if Tasks could be handled in the same way.

wr...@gmail.com <wr...@gmail.com> #156Apr 24, 2019 01:50AM

Keep the feature. Google should other item to google tasks

jd...@gmail.com <jd...@gmail.com> #157Apr 25, 2019 10:37AM

FIrst you remove Canvas, then Inbox. Please don't remove sub-sub task features. I don't understand the changes Google is making to take away services and features.

an...@schegg.org <an...@schegg.org> #158Apr 27, 2019 12:09AM

Please keep multiple (many) levels of subtasks. I have multiple lists with 2 levels of subtasks.

Also, loss of canvas and it's UI was very disappointing. It affects my daily workflow. I am trying to find google tasks UI alternatives for desktop use. I'd prefer an offering from google.

Message last modified on Apr 27, 2019 12:16AM

sj...@gmail.com <sj...@gmail.com> #159Apr 27, 2019 08:02PM

Please, please, please do not drop the ability to have multiple levels of tasks in the task tool. It is a VERY VALUABLE feature!!!!!

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #160May 1, 2019 07:11PM

I used Android Outliner to rescue my multilevel tasks.

Connected the App with my Google Tasks and changed the synchronisation method for all my Taskslists/Outlines to "TreelineDropbox".
I have Dropbox-synchronised multilevel tasklists on my phone now and a free desktop Outliner (Treeline Outliner).
There is a detailed tutorial for Android Outliner which describes the synchronisation setup for both, Google Tasks and Treeline Dropbox. And you need the PRO version because the free version lacks the synchronisation feature.

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #161May 3, 2019 01:47PM

Unless you get this working on KEEP, then please keep this. I still use GTO Tasks on android, which is how google should work this.

ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #162May 5, 2019 11:24AM

jp...@gmail.com <jp...@gmail.com> #163May 5, 2019 02:45PM

Please keep multi-level support / nested tasks!!!!!!!!!!!!

ad...@gmail.com <ad...@gmail.com> #164May 6, 2019 08:37AM

Another vote here for keeping Google Tasks useful and robust. Please don't remove any features. Thanks!

ad...@gmail.com <ad...@gmail.com> #165May 8, 2019 05:30PM

Please don't change multiple subtasks and.integrate Google Tasks with Google Keep.

se...@googlemail.com <se...@googlemail.com> #166May 17, 2019 08:31AM

please keep supporting multi level sub tasks

jb...@gmail.com <jb...@gmail.com> #167Jun 4, 2019 11:14PM

Keep supporting multi-level sub tasks please.

bl...@gmail.com <bl...@gmail.com> #168Jun 10, 2019 02:18AM

Please keep supporting multi-level tasks. There are MANY times when my tasks need more than two levels. Even if you only supported three levels it would be substantially better than just two. Two is not enough for basic functionality. Thank you.

ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #169Jul 3, 2019 01:51PM

Keep supporting multi-level sub tasks please

ke...@gmail.com <ke...@gmail.com> #170Jul 7, 2019 08:12PM

Keep multi-level sub tasks!

ad...@gmail.com <ad...@gmail.com> #171Jul 7, 2019 11:50PM

.....

Message last modified on Jul 7, 2019 11:52PM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #172Jul 9, 2019 12:30PM

Completely disappointed with this decision. Please keep the nested tasks!! We need them....!!

ml...@gmail.com <ml...@gmail.com> #173Jul 9, 2019 12:33PM

Can you please reconsider? I have been using this feature since 8 or 9 years and without it google tasks will not be as useful anymore..

Message last modified on Jul 9, 2019 12:33PM

my...@gmail.com <my...@gmail.com> #174Jul 10, 2019 11:20AM

I would like to add a link and/or calendar entry from within tasks when editing a task. Please don't get rid of tested sub-tasks.

jf...@gmail.com <jf...@gmail.com> #175Jul 21, 2019 03:04PM

Nested tasks are critical - please keep the functionality!

am...@gmail.com <am...@gmail.com> #176Jul 25, 2019 03:39PM

The sub tasks is the reason why I use the google task list. Please keep the functionality.

jl...@gmail.com <jl...@gmail.com> #177Jul 29, 2019 07:07PM

What is the reasoning behind removing this feature? I don't understand...
As if removing the Canvas/full screen task view was bad enough...

I had such hopes they would eventually update the canvas view since it with gtasks was one of the only task apps that did what I wanted, only to have it discontinued and than dumbed down further.

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #178Jul 30, 2019 08:48PM

You pretty much eviscerated the usefulness of Tasks with the deletion of more than one level of subtasks and the elimination of the full screen canvas option.

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #179Aug 5, 2019 10:14PM

I've been using Quire ever since Google stiffed us, so for a number of months now. I have to say, it works great, does everything that Tasks did and more. There's a bit of a learning curve - couple days, plus a couple hours moving your stuff over. But it works great - infinite level of sub-tasks, full page view (once you figure out how), and huge team-sharing capabilities (which I don't need). I posted a how-to on the conversion several months ago in this thread, so if you're interested, you can probably look it up.

er...@toplevelfunding.com <er...@toplevelfunding.com> #180Aug 28, 2019 02:12PM

They are probably trying to push a new CRM and G tasks will give it less need.

ne...@gmail.com <ne...@gmail.com> #181Oct 15, 2019 11:15PM

For the love of all that HOLY! Please bring this feature back!!! I've tried every To Do/Task app out there and only GTasks has the calendar integration that doesn't drive me up the wall!!!

pi...@gmail.com <pi...@gmail.com> #182Dec 4, 2019 08:51PM

Please keep multiple levels. At least in the Tasks API. A lot of Apps and their users rely on this great feature. And so do I.

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #183Dec 4, 2019 10:22PM

I don't think it's gonna happen guys. BUT, I've been using Quire for almost
a year now and it works great - similar to Google Tasks but more powerful.
You may be able to search my long ago post on how to transition your stuff
from Tasks to Quire.
No, I don't have any affiliation with Quire. But I had used Tasks for over
a decade and had thousands of entries sorted and organized on it. The
transition to Quire was not too bad, and I am very happy now.

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:51 PM <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

re...@action-ed.com <re...@action-ed.com> #184Jan 4, 2020 03:00PM

I can’t use gTasks to project plan any more because of the one level. This sucks so so so bad.

i....@univerpl.com.ua <i....@univerpl.com.ua> #185Jun 3, 2020 05:02AM

i need g-task for desktop !!!!
without it difficult to us it and i should looking for something else

j....@gmail.com <j....@gmail.com> #186Jul 10, 2020 02:02AM

Typical of Google, isn't it. Here I was looking for a to-do utility I could use with Linux and Android, with some sort of sync capability, and I find that, as usual, Google has it's head up it's butt. Maybe that's why they can't hear their userbase, too much you-know-what in their ears.

Just sad that even as a Linux user, I can get better access to Microsoft online apps than I can Google ones.

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #187Jul 31, 2020 01:52AM

Please keep supporting sub-level tasks - such a useful feature.

fo...@gmail.com <fo...@gmail.com> #188Nov 4, 2020 07:28AM

Keep multiple level tasks. It was one of strong point for Google.

no...@ensta.edu.dz <no...@ensta.edu.dz> #189Jan 2, 2021 01:43PM

I need this multiple levels of sub-tasks... it is very important

ah...@gmail.com <ah...@gmail.com> #190Jan 6, 2021 07:09PM

Please keep multiple levels, it is such a useful feature.

kb...@gmail.com <kb...@gmail.com> #191Jan 15, 2021 10:16PM

Please keep multiple levels of tasks.
Frankly, I'm amazed this even needs to be up for debate.
Thanks!

gi...@gmail.com <gi...@gmail.com> #192Sep 10, 2021 01:29PM

I really need multi-level tasks feature.
I think it's a must have for such a tool.

sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #193Dec 17, 2021 04:45PM

Only reason to use Google Tasks.

le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #194Mar 17, 2022 12:31PM

Please keep multi levels of sub tasks +1

vl...@gmail.com <vl...@gmail.com> #195Apr 1, 2022 03:23PM

unfortunately google not invests in google tasks.
multi-levels is a small technical feature that do a lot in task management

st...@elray.co <st...@elray.co> #196Jun 2, 2022 05:15PM

NEED MULTI LEVEL SUBTASKS- BRING IT BACK!!!!

wr...@gmail.com <wr...@gmail.com> #197Jun 2, 2022 11:04PM

Kind regards

Wayne Greenhalgh

M: 0402313948

ᐧ

On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 03:15, <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #198Aug 9, 2022 08:21AM

Please keep multi levels of sub tasks +1

bl...@gmail.com <bl...@gmail.com> #199Oct 14, 2022 07:52AM

google task..... an involution to simple "grocery list capable" and little else....How is that possible?all those minimalists movements will take us to involution too....

PLEASE RESTORE MULTILEVEL NESTING PLEASE

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #200Mar 15, 2023 11:16AM

Please restore, would be the only reason for me to use it

fl...@gmail.com <fl...@gmail.com> #201Nov 8, 2023 04:26PM

Not even buying grocery effectively can be achieved if items cannot be sub-grouped. Zero level lists is as brilliant as Notepad.

sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #202Nov 8, 2023 04:30PM

Amen amen amen amen amen.

Issue 113611082

Description

Issue summary

Comments

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #2Aug 31, 2018 12:45PM

ce...@gmail.com <ce...@gmail.com> #3Aug 31, 2018 04:51PM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #4Sep 4, 2018 09:59AM

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #5Sep 4, 2018 06:45PM

ju...@gmail.com <ju...@gmail.com> #6Sep 6, 2018 04:33AM

af...@gmail.com <af...@gmail.com> #7Sep 7, 2018 06:51PM

sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #8Sep 10, 2018 02:42PM

tc...@dogtowndev.com <tc...@dogtowndev.com> #9Sep 12, 2018 05:48PM

be...@gmail.com <be...@gmail.com> #10Sep 13, 2018 12:48PM

pe...@infogenius.com <pe...@infogenius.com> #11Sep 14, 2018 01:44AM

ph...@gmail.com <ph...@gmail.com> #12Sep 22, 2018 03:58PM

da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #13Sep 24, 2018 07:02PM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #14Sep 30, 2018 08:48AM

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #15Oct 2, 2018 03:13PM

mo...@brakestad.com <mo...@brakestad.com> #16Oct 12, 2018 12:44PM

re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #17Oct 24, 2018 06:49AM

pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #18Oct 26, 2018 01:39PM

so...@caslco.com <so...@caslco.com> #19Oct 30, 2018 03:49AM

hs...@gmail.com <hs...@gmail.com> #20Nov 20, 2018 08:09AM

kn...@gmail.com <kn...@gmail.com> #21Nov 20, 2018 11:14PM

jn...@gmail.com <jn...@gmail.com> #22Nov 27, 2018 05:52AM

kn...@gmail.com <kn...@gmail.com> #23Nov 27, 2018 03:03PM

de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #24Nov 27, 2018 07:09PM

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #25Nov 29, 2018 04:41PM

bi...@gmail.com <bi...@gmail.com> #26Dec 1, 2018 12:18PM

gl...@gmail.com <gl...@gmail.com> #27Dec 1, 2018 12:27PM

so...@gmail.com <so...@gmail.com> #28Dec 2, 2018 01:22AM

gr...@gmail.com <gr...@gmail.com> #29Dec 2, 2018 01:47AM

he...@gmail.com <he...@gmail.com> #30Dec 2, 2018 04:05PM

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #31Dec 6, 2018 08:43PM

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #32Dec 9, 2018 05:04PM

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #33Dec 18, 2018 08:15PM

vl...@gmail.com <vl...@gmail.com> #34Dec 27, 2018 05:24AM

dd...@gmail.com <dd...@gmail.com> #35Dec 28, 2018 10:57AM

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #36Jan 7, 2019 12:34AM

cr...@gmail.com <cr...@gmail.com> #37Jan 8, 2019 05:58AM

re...@tothepenny.biz <re...@tothepenny.biz> #38Jan 8, 2019 06:04AM

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #39Jan 8, 2019 07:30AM

jn...@gmail.com <jn...@gmail.com> #40Jan 8, 2019 07:48AM

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #41Jan 10, 2019 02:59PM

pu...@gmail.com <pu...@gmail.com> #42Jan 12, 2019 05:40PM

ct...@gmail.com <ct...@gmail.com> #43Jan 13, 2019 10:53PM

ls...@gmail.com <ls...@gmail.com> #44Jan 14, 2019 07:29PM

pr...@tcsne.org <pr...@tcsne.org> #45Jan 17, 2019 03:20PM

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #46Jan 23, 2019 01:39AM

hy...@gmail.com <hy...@gmail.com> #47Jan 24, 2019 12:58AM

ys...@gmail.com <ys...@gmail.com> #48Jan 28, 2019 04:27AM

yi...@gmail.com <yi...@gmail.com> #49Jan 31, 2019 09:23PM

la...@gmail.com <la...@gmail.com> #50Feb 5, 2019 04:14PM

ma...@briody.net <ma...@briody.net> #51Feb 6, 2019 08:35AM

te...@googlemail.com <te...@googlemail.com> #52Feb 6, 2019 08:44AM

sl...@gmail.com <sl...@gmail.com> #53Feb 6, 2019 06:48PM

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #54Feb 6, 2019 07:57PM

gg...@gmail.com <gg...@gmail.com> #55Feb 7, 2019 08:39AM

je...@gmail.com <je...@gmail.com> #56Feb 8, 2019 03:16PM

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #57Feb 11, 2019 01:53AM

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #58Feb 12, 2019 01:39AM

si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #59Feb 13, 2019 07:55PM

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #60Feb 19, 2019 12:12AM

jf...@gmail.com <jf...@gmail.com> #61Feb 19, 2019 09:24PM

dm...@juno.com <dm...@juno.com> #62Feb 20, 2019 02:10PM

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #63Feb 20, 2019 08:38PM

si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #64Feb 27, 2019 02:07PM

si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #65Feb 27, 2019 02:09PM

mc...@geek.net.ru <mc...@geek.net.ru> #66Feb 28, 2019 03:56PM

vo...@gmail.com <vo...@gmail.com> #67Feb 28, 2019 04:18PM

vh...@gmail.com <vh...@gmail.com> #68Mar 1, 2019 02:41AM

th...@gmail.com <th...@gmail.com> #69Mar 6, 2019 10:46AM

jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #70Mar 7, 2019 05:41PM

hi...@gmail.com <hi...@gmail.com> #71Mar 16, 2019 11:59AM

pe...@gmail.com <pe...@gmail.com> #72Mar 17, 2019 10:49AM

vo...@gmail.com <vo...@gmail.com> #73Mar 17, 2019 02:03PM

ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #74Mar 17, 2019 05:59PM

ho...@gmail.com <ho...@gmail.com> #75Mar 23, 2019 06:20PM

li...@gmail.com <li...@gmail.com> #76Mar 25, 2019 02:00PM

no...@gmail.com <no...@gmail.com> #77Mar 28, 2019 06:29PM