Assigned
Status Update
Comments
kn...@google.com <kn...@google.com> #2
Thanks for the report. I will route this to the appropriate internal team and update this when I hear back from them.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #3
One more detail, Data Layer event calls from the watch to the phone (running Android 13) do work on if the listener is in an Activity or Fragment.
db...@tzero.com <db...@tzero.com> #4
Also, I'm seeing this message in the Logcat:
"2022-06-12 18:47:15.156 1841-4562/? W/PackageManager: Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER"
"2022-06-12 18:47:15.156 1841-4562/? W/PackageManager: Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER"
w....@gmail.com <w....@gmail.com> #5
Experiencing the same issues, please see my other report for any useful logs:
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/235673375
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #6
+1, can confirm it doesn't work on Android 13:=
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver }
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Access blocked: ComponentInfo{xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver}
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 ActivityManager pid-589 W Unable to start service Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver } U=0: not found
le...@pepkorit.com <le...@pepkorit.com> #7
Note that I've been able to make it work by:
- Adding
<action android:name="com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER" />
in the intent filter - Removing
<data android:scheme="wear" android:host="*" />
But I feel like this is not something we should do
dz...@nsoft.com <dz...@nsoft.com> #8
I'm really afraid Android 13 might get released as-is, breaking WearOS app communication 😨😨
he...@gmail.com <he...@gmail.com> #9
If you're not targeting API 33 you're not affected by the bug. So it's a big bug, and yes we of course expected more from Google, but you can always target the api level later when it's fixed.
But I agree this is kind of desperating that more than 1.5 month after the first report nothing has changed.
Description
E.g.
- not easy to find the latest file being created or updated in a large bucket --> sort by
- add creation date, user (creator)
- filter by user, regex on name (and/or suffix)
...
The above can be done with the API set, or third-party browser - why not in console (+extend to Mobile).