Fixed
Status Update
Comments
ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #2
since these are in public API (:/) we need to do this in 1.2
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
br...@gmail.com <br...@gmail.com> #3
since it is already marked as deprecated, we can probably do it by now.
br...@gmail.com <br...@gmail.com> #4
Opening diff shortly
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #5
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit d576cbdc911cba16638a44fd8223391a90a07ef7
Author: Mike Nakhimovich <digitalbuddha@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue Aug 11 09:30:34 2020
[GH] Hide deprecated internal API.
## Proposed Changes
* `RoomDatabase.java` has protected `mCallbacks` field which is leaking in the API docs, we should @Hide it.
## Testing
Test: Ran unit tests locally
## Issues Fixed
Fixes: 76109329
This is an imported pull request fromhttps://github.com/androidx/androidx/pull/61 .
Resolves #61
Github-Pr-Head-Sha: 6440daa3a63752c7f9d5ba2a390248cd85bc634f
GitOrigin-RevId: fe92d8466a59b44b218b6ca3cbd57dcda17992f7
Change-Id: Id599cdf5b02b32bdae0166266fb7da967598fe92
A room/runtime/api/current.ignore
M room/runtime/api/current.txt
M room/runtime/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M room/runtime/api/restricted_current.txt
M room/runtime/src/main/java/androidx/room/RoomDatabase.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1396827
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit d576cbdc911cba16638a44fd8223391a90a07ef7
Author: Mike Nakhimovich <digitalbuddha@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue Aug 11 09:30:34 2020
[GH] Hide deprecated internal API.
## Proposed Changes
* `RoomDatabase.java` has protected `mCallbacks` field which is leaking in the API docs, we should @Hide it.
## Testing
Test: Ran unit tests locally
## Issues Fixed
Fixes: 76109329
This is an imported pull request from
Resolves #61
Github-Pr-Head-Sha: 6440daa3a63752c7f9d5ba2a390248cd85bc634f
GitOrigin-RevId: fe92d8466a59b44b218b6ca3cbd57dcda17992f7
Change-Id: Id599cdf5b02b32bdae0166266fb7da967598fe92
A room/runtime/api/current.ignore
M room/runtime/api/current.txt
M room/runtime/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M room/runtime/api/restricted_current.txt
M room/runtime/src/main/java/androidx/room/RoomDatabase.java
Description
Version used: 2.1.0 alpha 05
Deep links with arguments that are enum types are not recognized and parsed unless the casing in the deeplink is an exact match to the enum. This may not be feasible to fix/add, but wanted to bring it up just in case.
consider an example where I have an enum like so
enum class Colors {
RED,
BLUE,
GREEN
}
And a destination with an argument that takes a Colors, and supports a deeplink
<argument
android:name="destColor"
app:argType="com.my.app.Colors"
android:defaultValue="RED" />
<deepLink
app:uri="
The deeplink will only work if the color is correctly cased:
And the following will NOT work:
Granted, paths in URI's are by rule considered to be case-sensitive, so
It would be nice if perhaps when setting up a destination argument of an enum type (or maybe when defining a deep link) we had the option to specify that a deeplink should or should not match based on case-sensitivity. Of course, there's still the challenge of parsing "red" to Colors.RED when processing the deep link arguments.