Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
gi...@google.com
Hello,
Thanks for reaching out to us!
The Product Engineering Team has been made aware of your feature request, and will address it in due course. Though we can't provide an ETA on feature requests nor guarantee their implementation, rest assured that your feedback is always taken very seriously, as it allows us to improve our products. Thank you for your trust and continued support to improve Google Cloud Platform products.
In case you want to report a new issue, please do not hesitate to create a new
Thanks & Regards,
Manish Bavireddy.
Google Cloud Support
mi...@sada.com
We are stuck with the same problem.
We have an open case with Google Support about this and, among others, they have redirected us here.
We have tried the following workaround:
START THE WORKARROUND
As per temporary fix the recommended way to match on port would be at the Gateway level.In the following example, the Route will only match incoming traffic on port 80 because it's attaching to the "http" Gateway listener.
apiVersion:
kind: Gateway
metadata:
name: my-gateway
spec:
gatewayClassName: gke-l7-global-external-managed
listeners:
- name: http
protocol: HTTP
port: 80
- name: https
protocol: HTTPS
port: 443
---
apiVersion:
kind: HTTPRoute
metadata:
name: http-store-80
spec:
parentRefs:
- name: my-gateway
sectionName: http
hostnames:
- "
rules:
backendRefs:
- name: my-service
port: 8080
END THE WORKARROUND
But the workarround has not worked, the problem persists.
We post this comment to see what the status of the Issue is and to see if there are other workarrounds available.
Thanks & Regards,
Joan Cholvi.
Mercadona
ad...@lsst.cloud
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
The information has been shared with the Product Team and further updates will be provided in this thread.
According to the
Please note that the Issue Tracker is primarily meant for reporting bugs and requesting new features. If you have any additional issues or concerns, please don’t hesitate to create a new thread on the
Thanks
Description
What you would like to accomplish:
Provide users the ability to edit Kubelet flags for garbage collection
How this might work:
1. User should be able to see the current values.
2. Be able to edit, either using gcloud or the UI.
If applicable, reasons why alternative solutions are not sufficient:
With the current values users are finding inodes are hitting limits.
Other information (workarounds you have tried, documentation consulted, etc):
Found the following code, [1].
[1]