Fixed
Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #2
Yigit, do you have time to fix it?
reemission of the same liveData is racy
reemission of the same liveData is racy
bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #3
yea i'll take it.
bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #4
Thanks for the detailed analysis. This may not be an issue anymore since we've started using Main.immediate there but I' not sure; I'll try to create a test case.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #5
just emitting same live data reproduces the issue.
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #6
With 2.2.0-alpha04 (that use Main.immediate), the issue seems to be still there (I tested it by calling emitSource() twice, like your test case)
jm...@gmail.com <jm...@gmail.com> #7
yea sorry immediate does not fix it.
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/frameworks/support/+/1112186
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #8
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1112186
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #9
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 0fb5fcd5139c455652796230b7982a9fc63c8f7a
Author: Jeremy Woods <jbwoods@google.com>
Date: Thu Dec 05 15:03:24 2019
Adjust the default fragment transition presets
The current fragment transition presets did not take into consideration
that fragments rarely have a non-opaque background. This change adjusts
the fragment presets with specifications specifically for fragments.
The open and close transitions now have a duration of 300 instead of 400
and the fade transition has a duration of 150. The open transition fades
the exiting view to an alpha of 0 instead of 0.4.
Test: Tested in muliple applications
BUG: 145468417
Change-Id: I6e1be474d0bb218e4a519bb09ea5bc1fc1757dcf
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_close_enter.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_close_exit.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_fade_enter.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_fade_exit.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_open_enter.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_open_exit.xml
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1183003
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit 0fb5fcd5139c455652796230b7982a9fc63c8f7a
Author: Jeremy Woods <jbwoods@google.com>
Date: Thu Dec 05 15:03:24 2019
Adjust the default fragment transition presets
The current fragment transition presets did not take into consideration
that fragments rarely have a non-opaque background. This change adjusts
the fragment presets with specifications specifically for fragments.
The open and close transitions now have a duration of 300 instead of 400
and the fade transition has a duration of 150. The open transition fades
the exiting view to an alpha of 0 instead of 0.4.
Test: Tested in muliple applications
BUG: 145468417
Change-Id: I6e1be474d0bb218e4a519bb09ea5bc1fc1757dcf
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_close_enter.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_close_exit.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_fade_enter.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_fade_exit.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_open_enter.xml
M fragment/fragment/src/main/res/anim/fragment_open_exit.xml
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #10
This has been fixed internally and will be available in the Fragment 1.2.0-rc04 release.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #11
Here is how the new presets will look given sample app from #4.
bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #12
Thanks, that looks much better!
Description
Version used: 1.2.0-rc02
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Android 8 & Android 10
In
When upgrading to 1.2.0-rc01 I noticed that the TRANSIT_FRAGMENT_OPEN ones now show a visual glitch. I've attached 3 videos:
1. before-1.2.0-rc02 show the default transition before upgrading.
2. after-1.2.0-rc02 shows the default transition after upgrading
3. rc02-with-cl-resources shows the transition when using set setCustomAnimations(R.anim.fragment_open_enter, R.anim.fragment_open_exit), copying over all the relevant resources from the CL to my own app.
What I expect to see after upgrading to 1.2.0-rc02 is the behaviour I see in the 3rd video. I fully understand that the animation changed and that for full control I should add my own, however I'm OK with the default ones as they generally are good enough for the apps I work on :)