Status Update
Comments
bl...@google.com <bl...@google.com>
gi...@google.com <gi...@google.com>
sh...@google.com <sh...@google.com>
bw...@google.com <bw...@google.com>
st...@google.com <st...@google.com> #2
em...@gtempaccount.com <em...@gtempaccount.com> #3
Definetly agree to develop cp function at least to make it easier cross-region copy task and it can be very usefull to avoid lots of configratin issues too.
bw...@google.com <bw...@google.com>
g....@luisaviaroma.com <g....@luisaviaroma.com> #4
el...@sada.com <el...@sada.com> #5
Is there an ETA for this feature request?
Thank you
Elena.
bw...@google.com <bw...@google.com> #6
This is not currently on the roadmap. It is still under consideration.
dy...@google.com <dy...@google.com>
rd...@cnet.com <rd...@cnet.com> #7
be...@soobeng.my <be...@soobeng.my> #8
dy...@google.com <dy...@google.com> #9
I appreciate this Feature Request. A BQ user should be able to copy a table cross region w/out enabling, or even learning about the Transfer Service.
The following (for example) should just work:
If mydataset1 is in region1 and mydataset2 is in region2, a cross-region table copy would result.
CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE mydataset1.mytable1
COPY mydataset2.mytable2
bq cp mydataset1.mytable1 mydataset2.mytable2
Current ETA is EOQ3 2023.
Cross region Network Traffic Egress charges will be incurred upon successful table copy completion.
The Egress charges will mirror that of GCS. See the "Network egress within Google Cloud" section here:
There will be no operations or retrieval costs to the cross-region copy job, but there will be Egress charges.
dy...@google.com <dy...@google.com> #10
Hi All - while we are waiting for cross region copy Preview [ to be announced soon ] , the cross region dataset replication preview may serve some of the use cases above
ro...@hsbc.com <ro...@hsbc.com> #11
dy...@google.com <dy...@google.com> #12
Yes. Cross region table copy Preview will support setting a destination CMEK that is different from the source CMEK.
Description
The semantics of a one-time copy and a repeating transfer are different. We should improve the user experience here and add cross-region support to bq cp. It can use transfer service under the hood, of course.
See: