Fixed
Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #2
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit 57ca221882695bd6a52549f4d9ea3b812e6fe87c
Author: Simon Schiller <simonschiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon Mar 22 16:09:30 2021
[GH] [FragmentStrictMode] Detect <fragment> tag usage
## Proposed Changes
- Detect `<fragment>` tag usage inside XML layouts
## Testing
Test: See `FragmentStrictModeTest#detectFragmentTagUsage`
## Issues Fixed
Fixes: 153738235
This is an imported pull request fromhttps://github.com/androidx/androidx/pull/141 .
Resolves #141
Github-Pr-Head-Sha: 4ea052596e4341b9f11bcf335e2bc38045a91f19
GitOrigin-RevId: 62e7487aa4874eef6bb556490e193717cf937251
Change-Id: Iae48578e85e4e4897f806d7ade2e2a660adf9479
M fragment/fragment/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M fragment/fragment/api/restricted_current.txt
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/strictmode/FragmentStrictModeTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentLayoutInflaterFactory.java
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/strictmode/FragmentStrictMode.java
A fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/strictmode/FragmentTagUsageViolation.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1649748
Branch: androidx-main
commit 57ca221882695bd6a52549f4d9ea3b812e6fe87c
Author: Simon Schiller <simonschiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon Mar 22 16:09:30 2021
[GH] [FragmentStrictMode] Detect <fragment> tag usage
## Proposed Changes
- Detect `<fragment>` tag usage inside XML layouts
## Testing
Test: See `FragmentStrictModeTest#detectFragmentTagUsage`
## Issues Fixed
Fixes: 153738235
This is an imported pull request from
Resolves #141
Github-Pr-Head-Sha: 4ea052596e4341b9f11bcf335e2bc38045a91f19
GitOrigin-RevId: 62e7487aa4874eef6bb556490e193717cf937251
Change-Id: Iae48578e85e4e4897f806d7ade2e2a660adf9479
M fragment/fragment/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M fragment/fragment/api/restricted_current.txt
M fragment/fragment/src/androidTest/java/androidx/fragment/app/strictmode/FragmentStrictModeTest.kt
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/FragmentLayoutInflaterFactory.java
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/strictmode/FragmentStrictMode.java
A fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/strictmode/FragmentTagUsageViolation.java
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #3
This has been fixed internally and will be available in the Fragment 1.3.0-alpha04 release.
lu...@ozrunways.com <lu...@ozrunways.com> #4
I've confirmed the fix in a snapshot build of androidx fragment with that change. Thanks for the quick turnaround!
an...@google.com <an...@google.com> #5
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #6
We've decided to release a Fragment 1.2.5 bug fix release and will be including this change in that release.
Description
Current behavior: calling setMenuVisibility(false) suppresses calls to that fragment's onCreateOptionsMenu, but still dispatches calls to child fragments' onCreateOptionsMenu methods.
Desired behavior: calling setMenuVisibility(false) also suppresses calls to child fragments' onCreateOptionsMenu methods.
This would simplify using FragmentStateAdapter with nested fragments. Currently we have to manually propagate setMenuVisibility calls down from the parent fragment in the adapter, to it's children. Without doing that, menu items from the child fragments are not removed as the active item changes. I found a bug report with a similar workaround for this here:
If this behavior isn't changed, can I suggest changing the documentation for the setMenuVisibility method to make it clear that it doesn't include child fragments.
Component used: Fragment
Version used: 1.3.0-alpha03
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Emulator, Android API 29