Status Update
Comments
vi...@google.com <vi...@google.com>
di...@google.com <di...@google.com>
ch...@google.com <ch...@google.com> #2
I am not sure I understand the use case. how can the benchmark be code to real world scenario when it's not possible to do right now ? which scenario is it ?
In any case, since this would be for benchmarking, this would clearly not be available through the public DSL. We should find a semi-private way of doing this (maybe the private variant API object could offer that functionality for instance or a property).
ch...@google.com <ch...@google.com> #3
We want benchmarks to measure code after Progaurd / R8, but it's not possible to turn that on for androidTests in library modules at the moment (to my knowledge?)
Benchmarks are also a public facing thing, but we have a plugin to help configure gradle builds for our users, so if support for this ends up in a private API, we could try to keep those usages localized to our code perhaps.
jl...@google.com <jl...@google.com>
jl...@google.com <jl...@google.com> #4
Any update on the status of this request and when it can be supported?
Thanks,
Amanda
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com>
jg...@google.com <jg...@google.com>
an...@google.com <an...@google.com> #5
this is not part of our OKR at this point so we are not talking soon. at first glance, we would need to simulate usage patterns to minify against and such, this seems substantial amount of work. there are not a lot of library module that have android tests, most only rely on unit-tests.
how important is this ? we are out of PM right now but I suspect the next step will be to negotiate with J. Eason and xav@ to scale a priority level.
an...@google.com <an...@google.com> #6
This is a high priority request for Compose, to enable their benchmarks to measure release accurate performance. (Micro) Benchmarks are library modules, as they don't need the complexity of multi-apk tests - they're self measuring APKs that depend on libraries. (d.android.com/benchmark)
there are not a lot of library module that have android tests, most only rely on unit-tests.
To clarify, this is for com.android.library
modules, not jars - I'd expect most of those to use android tests (all of the libraries in jetpack for example do).
we would need to simulate usage patterns to minify against and such, this seems substantial amount of work
Simulate usage patterns? I don't understand - the dev can themselves provide a keep rule for test infra / classes if necessary. Long term, keep rules should be provided by test libraries.
Description
Android Studio 4.1.1
Build #AI-201.8743.12.41.6953283, built on November 5, 2020
Runtime version: 1.8.0_242-release-1644-b3-6222593 amd64
VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o
Linux 4.15.0-124-generic
Current Desktop: X-Cinnamon
Some vector drawables show fine in Design window, but are cropped/displaced very much in Resource Manager panel.
Two specific cases I've discovered:
See the left side on screenshots. Sample project attached.
Same happens in Android Studio 4.2 Canary 16. Not affected by enabling/disabling new Layout Rendering Engine. So it's not yet another duplicate of that issue . ;)