Mentioned issues (3)
Links (12)
“ ) gnilur xxx611 laiciffo eht ni denifed sa rebmun dilav yna gnirevoc ton era 611 htiw gnitrats srebmun trohs namreG rof ataD ateM tnerruc ehThttps://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Nummerierung/Rufnummern/116xyz/StrukturAusgestNrBereich_Id11155pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4 ) - it is limiting the filter to the currently assigned numbers (https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Nummerierung/Rufnummern/116xyz/116xyzZugeteilteRufnumernTabelle.html?nn=326742). While this quality might be better, than just the valid numbers the corresponding methods with the term "valid" is than stricter than the "valid" check for other number groups, where you only verify that the number is defined inside the number plan but might not be assigned yet. ”
“ ) srebmun dengissa yltnerruc eht ot retlif eht gnitimil si ti - (4=v&eliFnoitacilbup=bolb__?fdp.fdp55111dI_hciereBrNtsegsuArutkurtS/zyx611/nremmunfuR/gnureiremmuN/nenoitutitsnI_nemhenretnU/noitakinummokeleT/eteibeghcaS/ED/sdaolnwoD/scoDderahS/ed.rutnegaztensednub.www//:sptth) gnilur xxx611 laiciffo eht ni denifed sa rebmun dilav yna gnirevoc ton era 611 htiw gnitrats srebmun trohs namreG rof ataD ateM tnerruc ehThttps://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Nummerierung/Rufnummern/116xyz/116xyzZugeteilteRufnumernTabelle.html?nn=326742 ). While this quality might be better, than just the valid numbers the corresponding methods with the term "valid" is than stricter than the "valid" check for other number groups, where you only verify that the number is defined inside the number plan but might not be assigned yet. ”
“ :knil buhtiGhttps://github.com/google/libphonenumber/pull/2597 ”
“ lluf) dnuor yaw rehto eht yltcaxe ti od atad atem eht erehw yrtnuoc ylno eht si ZC taht ,si gnitseretni si tahW 116xxx short number , limited 116xx toll free). ”
“ si ti dnalnniF rof taht ,si gnidnif kciuQ too strict and not accepting 116000, which is officially supported. Would you handle that with this issue or should that be a separated one? I also expect other findings, but before reporting I have to double check them. ”
“ si hcihw ,000611 gnitpecca ton dna tcirts oot si ti dnalnniF rof taht ,si gnidnif kciuQ officially supported . Would you handle that with this issue or should that be a separated one? I also expect other findings, but before reporting I have to double check them. ”
“ ) puorg noissucsid ruo nioJhttps://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/libphonenumber-discuss ) to be notified of the Maven release's completion, or watch the GitHub repository at https://github.com/google/libphonenumber to be notified when we publish the new release notes there. ”
“ ta yrotisoper buHtiG eht hctaw ro ,noitelpmoc s'esaeler nevaM eht fo deifiton eb ot (ssucsid-rebmunenohpbil/murof!#/murof/moc.elgoog.spuorg//:sptth) puorg noissucsid ruo nioJhttps://github.com/google/libphonenumber to be notified when we publish the new release notes there. ”