Status Update
Comments
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #2
Jeremy, is this still an issue? I think the problem was that you had two transitions targeting the same View for the same action (e.g. two Slide() transitions).
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #3
I have a similar issue with plain AnimatorSet:
set.start()
set.pause()
set.setCurrentPlayTime(100)
set.setCurrentPlayTime(0)
set.setCurrentPlayTime(100)
set.resume()
doesn't play animation in resume().
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #4
Should clarify that if I filter out setCurrentPlayTime(0)
(or replace it with setCurrentPlayTime(1)
) it works well.
Also even with setCurrentPlayTime(0)
, onAnimationEnd
is notified with correct delay (as if the animation has played).
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #5
@
I think that is intended for Animator. If you set the currentPlayTime
to 0 or the total duration the animator completes. We do some
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #6
Did some investigation on the Fragment side and it seems like the merged transition is targeting correctly.
Exiting Transition: Slide@aa9288e: tgts(android.widget.LinearLayout{f9add3d})
>>>>> ExitingViews <<<<<
View: android.widget.LinearLayout{f9add3d}
Entering Transition: Slide@35b8af: tgts(android.widget.LinearLayout{b7f24bc})
>>>>> EnteringViews <<<<<
View: android.widget.LinearLayout{b7f24bc}
Final merged transition: TransitionSet@7bc1c45:
TransitionSet@e133f9a:
Slide@aa9288e: tgts(android.widget.LinearLayout{f9add3d})
Slide@35b8af: tgts(android.widget.LinearLayout{b7f24bc})
merged transition passed to controlDelayedTransition: TransitionSet@7bc1c45:
TransitionSet@e133f9a:
Slide@aa9288e: tgts(android.widget.LinearLayout{f9add3d})
Slide@35b8af: tgts(android.widget.LinearLayout{b7f24bc})
Still digging.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #7
Branch: androidx-main
commit 567b7459329d1ec8d27a8c6fe1c4a86442065d7d
Author: Jeremy Woods <jbwoods@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 26 20:06:54 2023
Add additional logging for transitions
Adding more debug logging in transitions to track the entering and
exiting transitions as well as the final merged transition and its
targets.
Test: added logging
Bug: 300157785
Change-Id: I0d9ad72b865422493c6c895ddb6115abf85eed16
M fragment/fragment/src/main/java/androidx/fragment/app/DefaultSpecialEffectsController.kt
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8
So I have isolated this outside of fragment into something much simpler and I think it breaks down when it comes to the adding and removing of Views with animateToStart.
The attached sample is a simple add that goes between two screens BLUE
and GREEN
. It has code for both the 1.5.0-alpha03
and 1.5.0-alpha04
versions, but I think alpha04 is currently broken in another way so I will upload the alpha03 version here.
This is integrated with predictive back similar to how fragment is, so upon cancelling we call animateToStart
, then we do a beginDelayedTransition
on a 0
duration Fade()
and we reverse the view visibility back to what it was prior to starting the transition.
If you only do visibility, cancel always works the view never goes away, it is wonderful, but when you do adding and removing views like we need to in fragment it fails.
First the code for beginDelayedTransition goes from this:
TransitionManager.beginDelayedTransition(container, Fade().apply {
duration = 0
})
reverseViews()
to this:
TransitionManager.beginDelayedTransition(container, Fade().apply {
duration = 0
addListener(onEnd = {
reverseViews()
blueScreen.visibility = View.VISIBLE
greenScreen.visibility = View.VISIBLE
})
})
reverseViews(useVisibility = true)
We need to make this change because after the animateToStart()
view is still parented by the overlay, so we call reverseViews(useVisibility = true)
to only change the visibility and then once the transition finishes we can call reverseViews()
to parent the view properly, then we make both views visible again.
From our perspective after the 0
duration transition our views are back in the proper state, but they do not transition properly after a cancel.
If the app is doing this wrong and we can make the appropriate fixes, doing the same in fragment should resolve this. There is logging available that shows the state of the views when we start the transition.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #9
The API has changed since that project was created in a way that makes the API more robust. I'm hoping that has fixed this...
Description
Component used: Fragment Version used: 1.4.0-alpha01
Each instance of
androidx.fragment.strictmode.Violation
tracks a specific type of StrictMode violation. Ideally, each subclass of Violation should have enough structured information (i.e., getters) to allow developers to verify exactly what caused the violation. This could include the Fragment instance itself or violation specific information. This would greatly improve the ability to have custom loggers extract this information and parse it in a useful way.The base
Violation
class should have agetFragment()
method that returns a NonNullFragment
instance that caused the Violation.Examples of information I'd expect to be available:
FragmentReuseViolation
:mRemoved
flag with amPreviousWho
nullable String).FragmentTagUsageViolation
:ViewGroup
that the Fragment would have been added to.RetainInstanceUsageViolation
:RetainInstanceUsageViolation
:SetRetainInstanceUsageViolation
andGetRetainInstanceUsageViolation
to allow distinguishing the two casesSetUserVisibleHintViolation
:boolean
indicating on whether the fragment was being setisVisibleToUser
or notTargetFragmentUsageViolation
TargetFragmentUsageViolation
:SetTargetFragmentUsageViolation
would include the targetFragment
instance and the intrequestCode
GetTargetFragmentUsageViolation
(no additional information)GetTargetFragmentRequestCodeUsageViolation
(no additional information)WrongFragmentContainerViolation
ViewGroup
container that the Fragment was trying to be added to