Fixed
Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #2
Nested scrolling works partially (as per http://b/122818889 ). Let's discuss if we need full support and if so make sure it works.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #3
Hi!
What is 'partially' exactly?
How do I see it?
Thanks!
What is 'partially' exactly?
How do I see it?
Thanks!
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #4
As of now:
- Nesting scroll views with a scroll direction perpendicular to the ViewPager2's orientation inside ViewPager2 works
- Nesting scroll views with a scroll direction parallel to the ViewPager2's orientation inside ViewPager2 does not work
- Nesting scroll views with a scroll direction perpendicular to the ViewPager2's orientation inside ViewPager2 works
- Nesting scroll views with a scroll direction parallel to the ViewPager2's orientation inside ViewPager2 does not work
gm...@gmail.com <gm...@gmail.com> #5
Horizontal ViewPager2 not correctly working into a vertical RecyclerView
Set a setNestedScrollingEnabled to the RecyclerView into the ViewPager2 (across reflection) resolves the problem
Set a setNestedScrollingEnabled to the RecyclerView into the ViewPager2 (across reflection) resolves the problem
gm...@gmail.com <gm...@gmail.com> #6
ageevvalentin@gmail.com, could you provide a sample app? I'd like to learn more about the circumstances that cause the problem; putting a clean ViewPager2 inside a clean RecyclerView seems to work fine, so there must be other factors involved.
Description
Component used: Navigation Version used: 2.3.5
It is often convenient to specify default argument values in an action , for example when multiple actions point to the same destination.
Sometimes we only specify values for some arguments:
We then would like to call it like this:
FirstFragmentDirections.goToSecond("one!")
.But unfortunately, SafeArgs generates code with parameters in the wrong order:
argTwo
(with default value), thenargOne
. See attached project.I suppose better options would be to: