Change theme
Help
Press space for more information.
Show links for this issue (Shortcut: i, l)
Copy issue ID
Previous Issue (Shortcut: k)
Next Issue (Shortcut: j)
Sign in to use full features.
Vote: I am impacted
Notification menu
Refresh (Shortcut: Shift+r)
Go home (Shortcut: u)
Use Markdown for this comment
Set severity, which reflects how much the issue affects the use of the product
Change issue status back to 'Assigned'
Pending code changes (auto-populated)
[ID: 84651]
Story points rate the relative effort of work in a Fibonacci-like format: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 100. Each team will estimate work on a slightly different scale, which means the values in this field are likely only meaningful to the team that owns the Buganizer component in which the issue resides.
See Atlassian's Agile Coach for more information on how to use story points for estimation: https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/estimation [ID: 746686]
Set the version(s) of the product affected by this issue (comma-separated list)
Set the version(s) of the product in which the issue should be fixed (comma-separated list)
Set the version(s) of the product in which the issue fix was verified (comma-separated list)
Set if this issue occurs in production
[ID: 85206]
Set Reporter
Set Type
Set priority, which reflects how soon the issue should be fixed
Set Status
Set Assignee
Set Verifier
Remove item
View or edit staffing
View issue level access limits(Press Alt + Right arrow for more information)
Description
#1Component used:androidx.room:room-*
Version used: 2.3.0, 2.4.0-alpha02
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: N/A -> code-gen error (kapt)
The documentation on states:
@Transaction
But unless I'm misunderstanding what this is trying to communicate, reality seems to be different.
Given the following dao:
Although implementations are generated, errors are thrown for the
@Transaction
annotated functions returningLiveData
andFlowable
:This seems to contradict the earlier statement from the documentation on
@Transaction
? Is there another way to use@Transaction
with a deferred/async return type?What's also interesting is that the
@Transaction
annotated function returning aFlow
does not yield any errors. Isn'tFlow
also a deferred/async return type? Does this mean that Room can in fact guarantee that all queries in the method are performed on the same thread? If so, how?The generated code looks like this:
This function is no longer deferred, because the transactional operations involve blocking I/O, and there are assertions in place that will fail if this is called from the main thread. And even if we were to make this function suspendable (we would then have a suspendable function returning a Flow?🤨), it would still not be main-safe.
In conclusion, I suspect:
@Transaction
is no longer accurate?@Transaction
annotation returning aFlow
should also yield a code-gen error?