Assigned
Status Update
Comments
xa...@google.com <xa...@google.com> #2
Same issue here
sp...@google.com <sp...@google.com> #3
Same issue here
xa...@google.com <xa...@google.com> #4
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #5
Me too.
emulator: WARNING: encryption is off
Hax is enabled
Hax ram_size 0x60000000
Failed to open vm 3
Failed to create HAX VM
No accelerator found.
failed to initialize HAX: Invalid argument
emulator: WARNING: encryption is off
Hax is enabled
Hax ram_size 0x60000000
Failed to open vm 3
Failed to create HAX VM
No accelerator found.
failed to initialize HAX: Invalid argument
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #6
Same problem here
it...@gmail.com <it...@gmail.com> #7
Hi all,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We are working with Intel on how to fix it, and have reproduced the problem in-house as well. Currently there doesn't seem to be a simple workaround. It also looks like macOS 10.13 added new security features that block kernel extensions such as HAXM without explicit user intervention, so we will need to streamline the install part as well.
In the meantime, we've tested Hypervisor.Framework which seems to work on 10.13. Try running the emulator on Canary channel 26.1.x (API 25/26 recommended) with Hypervisor.Framework; put the text "HVF = on" in ~/.android/advancedFeatures.ini (create this file if it doesn't exist already).
Frank
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We are working with Intel on how to fix it, and have reproduced the problem in-house as well. Currently there doesn't seem to be a simple workaround. It also looks like macOS 10.13 added new security features that block kernel extensions such as HAXM without explicit user intervention, so we will need to streamline the install part as well.
In the meantime, we've tested Hypervisor.Framework which seems to work on 10.13. Try running the emulator on Canary channel 26.1.x (API 25/26 recommended) with Hypervisor.Framework; put the text "HVF = on" in ~/.android/advancedFeatures.ini (create this file if it doesn't exist already).
Frank
tn...@google.com <tn...@google.com> #8
(x86 32-bit images only on that for now, as well)
1l...@gmail.com <1l...@gmail.com> #9
Worked perfect, thanks
Description
Consider a dynamic-feature,
df
, that depends on its app module,app
, and a library,lib
, as shown below:Running
lint
from theapp
module withcheckDependencies true
should cause issues fromlib
to be included inapp
's lint report. Currently, that's not the case - only issues fromapp
anddf
are included inapp
's lint report, not issues fromlib
.