Status Update
Comments
lc...@gmail.com <lc...@gmail.com> #2
1. Have you saw crash in real device or only in simulators?
2. Do you use dynamic feature for language ID?
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #3
Tested on Android 12 Emulator with custom executor, but cannot repro this issue.
il...@google.com <il...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #4
-
Second crash in the description is from a real device. Experienced it myself on two different Xiaomi phones, plus lots of crashes from users in the Google Play console.
-
Dynamic features are not used in the application.
As a wild guess, I have downgraded build tools from 31.0.0 to 30.0.3, compileSdk from 31 to 30, and moved all work with Language ID to the service in a separate process (just to be sure that crash can kill secondary process instead of main). This combination is in beta for 2 days by now and I don't see any SIGSEGV crashes.
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #5
Hmm, I feel the crash might be something related to separate/secondary process.
I also changed compileSdk and targetSDK to 31 but still cannot repro this issue.
ec...@gmail.com <ec...@gmail.com> #6
On the contrary, there was no separate process before, when crashes started.
In the new build (with the aforementioned changes) I can see SIGSEGV crash, but only one instead of dozens and it has a bit different backtrace:
signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR)
liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
backtrace:
#00 pc 000000000003c7c0 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003b960 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003bb48 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 000000000003bafc /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000036c98 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000032714 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000031cac /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/split_config.arm64_v8a.apk!lib/arm64-v8a/liblanguage_id_jni.so (offset 0x11e000)
#00 pc 0000000000057438 /data/app/azagroup.reedy-mF7zTu2bv_ELlbFArwNgqA==/oat/arm64/base.odex (offset 0x57000)
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #7
FYI, ML Kit launched a new language ID SDK in the latest release, which uses a new language ID model.
Could you try the new SDK version(17.0.0) to check if you can still repro this native crash? Thanks!
Description
Component used: Navigation
Version used: 2.4.0-alpha09
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: Not device dependent, code generation issue
Safeargs plugin on 2.4.0-alpha09 since it implemented this behaviour change below
When generating arguments, Safe Args now puts parameters without default values before those with default values. (I89709, b/198493585)
This bahvious change seesms to cause the side effect of compilation time errors in the genrated argument files. As far as I know this affects both kotlin and java generated files.
e.g.
XML navgraph destination (
NavCompFingerPrintAuthDialogFragment
)As you can see the arguments with no default values are not defined first.
this will generate the argument data object shown below with the behavios change which puts the arguments with no default values first in the constructor.
Now the problem is that in the
NavCompFingerPrintAuthDialogFragmentArgs.fromBundle(bundle: Bundle): NavCompFingerPrintAuthDialogFragmentArgs
companion function does not use named arguments when creating aNavCompFingerPrintAuthDialogFragmentArgs
from a bundle. And it uses the arguments in the order that it was defined in the navgraph and not in the order that theNavCompFingerPrintAuthDialogFragmentArgs
data object expects in its constructor. The same issue also apples for the companion functionfromSavedStateHandle(savedStateHandle: SavedStateHandle):NavCompFingerPrintAuthDialogFragmentArgs
but compilation will fail at the earliest point so it was not reported in the error. But from what i can see in the genrated code, its will have the same problem too.One solution is to just use named arguments for kotlin generated files, but it does not solve the issue for java generated files. So perhaps putting the arguments in the order of the
behavior change
mention above shld solve the issue.