Fixed
Status Update
Comments
we...@google.com <we...@google.com> #2
Sergio shared a WIP CL to calculate more correct bounds. You can see in the screenshot attached here that it does a better job of tightening the bounds around the object (the yellow box), but that it misses some of the curves which expand beyond these tighter bounds. In particular, note the two triangles and the two blob shapes (rotated round rects).
I've attached another 2 screenshots from the ShapeEditor view of one of the blobs, showing the shape and controls/anchors. You can see that the tighter bounds (yellow rectangle) are constrained to the anchors, but the curves at the end go beyond those points and exceed the bounds.
I've attached another 2 screenshots from the ShapeEditor view of one of the blobs, showing the shape and controls/anchors. You can see that the tighter bounds (yellow rectangle) are constrained to the anchors, but the curves at the end go beyond those points and exceed the bounds.
we...@google.com <we...@google.com> #3
Part of the problem is that the min/max values are assigned the anchors to begin with. That would cause the problem we're seeing in #2, because these new bounds are constrained to the rectangle created by the anchor points, even if the control points cause curves to go outside of those bounds.
But that's not all of the problem here. When I changed those min/max values to use the control points instead, the bounds expanded to be essentially the same as the estimated bounds from before. So there's more to it.
But that's not all of the problem here. When I changed those min/max values to use the control points instead, the bounds expanded to be essentially the same as the estimated bounds from before. So there's more to it.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #4
Some of #3 is incorrect - the bounds can be expanded from the initial min/max values, so it is fine to have them start at the anchor points.
Meanwhile, I thought part of the problem might be calculating derivatives/etc for zero-length curves (of which there are many, given the way our shape rounding works). But adding in a check for this (setting the bounds of a curve to the same point when the anchors are equal within the distance epsilon) did not fix the problem; we still end up with bounds that are inside some of the curves (see attached screenshot)
Meanwhile, I thought part of the problem might be calculating derivatives/etc for zero-length curves (of which there are many, given the way our shape rounding works). But adding in a check for this (setting the bounds of a curve to the same point when the anchors are equal within the distance epsilon) did not fix the problem; we still end up with bounds that are inside some of the curves (see attached screenshot)
tr...@google.com <tr...@google.com> #5
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit 958577b15712233aa487003deb0ab37de3af7ab7
Author: Chet Haase <chet@google.com>
Date: Wed Dec 20 13:21:53 2023
Added more bounds calculation utilities
Previously, calculateBounds() returned the estimated bounds
for a RoundedPolygon. This is reasonable in most cases, but sometimes
you want the actual/minimal bounds instead. Also, sometimes you want
the max bounds for an object that might be rotated within its container,
so you need to size the container appropriately.
This CL introduces options for bounds calculations to handle these
new cases, along with some minor cleanups along the way.
Bug: 317286450
Test: Existing tests pass, added new bounds tests
Relnote: Now more options for retrieving exact and max bounds
Change-Id: I6d49f468a28c1f360000e8370f02a50841f744e4
M graphics/graphics-shapes/api/current.txt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/api/restricted_current.txt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/androidInstrumentedTest/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/PolygonTest.kt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/Cubic.kt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/RoundedPolygon.kt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/Utils.kt
M graphics/integration-tests/testapp-compose/src/main/java/androidx/graphics/shapes/testcompose/DebugDraw.kt
M graphics/integration-tests/testapp-compose/src/main/java/androidx/graphics/shapes/testcompose/MainActivity.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/2889768
Branch: androidx-main
commit 958577b15712233aa487003deb0ab37de3af7ab7
Author: Chet Haase <chet@google.com>
Date: Wed Dec 20 13:21:53 2023
Added more bounds calculation utilities
Previously, calculateBounds() returned the estimated bounds
for a RoundedPolygon. This is reasonable in most cases, but sometimes
you want the actual/minimal bounds instead. Also, sometimes you want
the max bounds for an object that might be rotated within its container,
so you need to size the container appropriately.
This CL introduces options for bounds calculations to handle these
new cases, along with some minor cleanups along the way.
Bug: 317286450
Test: Existing tests pass, added new bounds tests
Relnote: Now more options for retrieving exact and max bounds
Change-Id: I6d49f468a28c1f360000e8370f02a50841f744e4
M graphics/graphics-shapes/api/current.txt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/api/restricted_current.txt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/androidInstrumentedTest/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/PolygonTest.kt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/Cubic.kt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/RoundedPolygon.kt
M graphics/graphics-shapes/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/graphics/shapes/Utils.kt
M graphics/integration-tests/testapp-compose/src/main/java/androidx/graphics/shapes/testcompose/DebugDraw.kt
M graphics/integration-tests/testapp-compose/src/main/java/androidx/graphics/shapes/testcompose/MainActivity.kt
wu...@google.com <wu...@google.com> #6
Problem fixed - we now offer the option to request actual bounds (or faster/approximated, based on a parameter to calculateBounds()).
We also offer a new API, calculateMaxBounds(), which returns the square bounds in which the object can be rotated without ever exceeding the bounds.
We also offer a new API, calculateMaxBounds(), which returns the square bounds in which the object can be rotated without ever exceeding the bounds.
le...@google.com <le...@google.com>
le...@google.com <le...@google.com>
le...@google.com <le...@google.com> #7
The attached video in MediaCodec#setParameters
with MediaCodec.PARAMETER_KEY_SUSPEND
. It will affect not only the current recording video using pause resume function but also the beginning of the next recording.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #8
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit 75cbc0b8a928dfc6bf3d75da027ed396ba684c87
Author: leo huang <leohuang@google.com>
Date: Wed Mar 23 18:45:00 2022
Fix audio/video out of sync after pause and resume on some Samsung devices pre-API 29
After calling MediaCodec.setParameters() with MediaCodec.PARAMETER_KEY_SUSPEND, the video codec of the issue device will send a timestamp missing the pause interval after resumed, which results in the video and audio to be out of sync after resumed.
The workaround is to not call MediaCodec.setParameters() when recording is paused. This shouldn't cause too much overhead since we'll still stop the camera from sending frames to the encoder surface when paused.
Relnote: "Fixed audio/video out of sync after pause and resume on some Samsung devices pre-API 29."
Bug: b/202798609 , b/202798572
Test: Manual testing
Change-Id: I646221b9f94ae688592d4be96245f17f74806f0b
A camera/camera-video/src/main/java/androidx/camera/video/internal/compat/quirk/VideoEncoderSuspendDoesNotIncludeSuspendTimeQuirk.java
M camera/camera-video/src/main/java/androidx/camera/video/internal/compat/quirk/DeviceQuirksLoader.java
M camera/camera-video/src/main/java/androidx/camera/video/internal/encoder/EncoderImpl.java
https://android-review.googlesource.com/2038784
Branch: androidx-main
commit 75cbc0b8a928dfc6bf3d75da027ed396ba684c87
Author: leo huang <leohuang@google.com>
Date: Wed Mar 23 18:45:00 2022
Fix audio/video out of sync after pause and resume on some Samsung devices pre-API 29
After calling MediaCodec.setParameters() with MediaCodec.PARAMETER_KEY_SUSPEND, the video codec of the issue device will send a timestamp missing the pause interval after resumed, which results in the video and audio to be out of sync after resumed.
The workaround is to not call MediaCodec.setParameters() when recording is paused. This shouldn't cause too much overhead since we'll still stop the camera from sending frames to the encoder surface when paused.
Relnote: "Fixed audio/video out of sync after pause and resume on some Samsung devices pre-API 29."
Bug:
Test: Manual testing
Change-Id: I646221b9f94ae688592d4be96245f17f74806f0b
A camera/camera-video/src/main/java/androidx/camera/video/internal/compat/quirk/VideoEncoderSuspendDoesNotIncludeSuspendTimeQuirk.java
M camera/camera-video/src/main/java/androidx/camera/video/internal/compat/quirk/DeviceQuirksLoader.java
M camera/camera-video/src/main/java/androidx/camera/video/internal/encoder/EncoderImpl.java
Description
On Samsung J7 prime (SM-G610M) use core test app to record video,
after video recorded, audio / video is not in sync and it seems that video frames are paused in the beginning of the video.
see attached video