Status Update
Comments
al...@google.com <al...@google.com> #2
In our case, we do indeed frequently see issues communicating with authoritative DNS servers which do not respond within the 1 second timeout that we set.
It's also the case that DNSViz (
The best thing you can do is make sure that you have geographically redundant name servers, so name serving is generally more reliable. In some locations we can resolve just fine while in others we always fail to receive responses in time.
fd...@gmail.com <fd...@gmail.com> #3
You were looking at an old analysis by DNSViz done on July 2020, I've updated it for you and it seems to be valid now:
From these locations it resolves 100% of the time fine for me: Amsterdam, Noord-Holland (NL) Lisbon, Lisboa (PT) Kiev, Kyiv (UA) Perth, Western Australia (AU) Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv (IL)
I'm seeing some occasional SERVFAILs from the locations: Atlanta, Georgia (US) Chicago, Illinois (US) Dallas, Texas (US) Los Angeles, California (US) San Jose, California (US) Osaka, Osaka (JP)
I see almost constant SERFAILs from locations: New York City, New York (US).
And never got past a SERVFAIL from these locations: Dubai, Dubayy (AE)
Looking at the distances of the locations to Bulgaria I suppose they're too far to roundtrip within the set timeout.
From Atlanta, Georgia (US):
~ % dig targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45017
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;targovishte.bg. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
targovishte.bg. 21599 IN A 83.228.89.3
;; Query time: 1432 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 09 11:40:21 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 59
~ % dig targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 57449
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;targovishte.bg. IN A
;; Query time: 2300 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 09 11:41:11 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 43
~ % dig targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47318
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;targovishte.bg. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
targovishte.bg. 21600 IN A 83.228.89.3
;; Query time: 299 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 09 11:41:23 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 59
~ % dig targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> targovishte.bg a @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 30543
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;targovishte.bg. IN A
;; Query time: 1283 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 09 11:41:29 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 43
~ % dig targovishte.bg ns @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> targovishte.bg ns @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 60229
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;targovishte.bg. IN NS
;; Query time: 3249 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 09 11:46:26 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 43
~ % dig targovishte.bg ns @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> targovishte.bg ns @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 25565
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;targovishte.bg. IN NS
;; Query time: 1124 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 09 11:46:29 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 43
~ % dig targovishte.bg ns @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> targovishte.bg ns @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30326
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;targovishte.bg. IN NS
;; ANSWER SECTION:
targovishte.bg. 21600 IN NS ns1.egov.bg.
targovishte.bg. 21600 IN NS ns2.egov.bg.
;; Query time: 353 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 09 11:46:30 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 84
do...@gmail.com <do...@gmail.com> #4
Today I made some changes for routing optimization, but Is till sometimes
receive ServeFail or timed out may be from specific places around the
world. I did;nt know when I asked 8.8.8.8 it tries on a round robin for DNS
query am I right ?
Best Regards,
Momchil
ŠŠ° Š²Ń, 9.11.2021 Š³. Š² 13:20 Ń. <buganizer-system@google.com> Š½Š°ŠæŠøŃŠ°:
do...@gmail.com <do...@gmail.com> #5
As I mentioned I already tried rerouting for the traffic through alternate ISPs.
We had problems only with Google DNS services.
I attached the Logs from all over the world from uptrends,
Can you check it again?
Best regards,
Momchil Momchilov
Network Security Engineer - CNsys PLC
do...@gmail.com <do...@gmail.com> #6
Do you see my last post, unfortunately the issue persist. Can you check it again?
Best Regards,
Momchil Momchilov
Description
We had troubles with resolving:
We received "Comment": "Name servers did not respond [83.228.89.235]."
I check the network connectivity everything seems that is OK from other public DNSs work correctly
Can you check with me what could be the provlem?
Best Regards,
Momchil Momchilov
Network Security Engineer