Assigned
Status Update
Comments
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com> #2
Thanks for the report. I will route this to the appropriate internal team and update this when I hear back from them.
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #3
One more detail, Data Layer event calls from the watch to the phone (running Android 13) do work on if the listener is in an Activity or Fragment.
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com> #4
Also, I'm seeing this message in the Logcat:
"2022-06-12 18:47:15.156 1841-4562/? W/PackageManager: Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER"
"2022-06-12 18:47:15.156 1841-4562/? W/PackageManager: Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER"
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #5
Experiencing the same issues, please see my other report for any useful logs:
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/235673375
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #6
+1, can confirm it doesn't work on Android 13:=
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Intent does not match component's intent filter: Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver }
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 PackageManager pid-589 W Access blocked: ComponentInfo{xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver}
2022-07-15 11:26:15.023 589-5347 ActivityManager pid-589 W Unable to start service Intent { act=com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER cmp=xxx/xxx.WatchMessageReceiver } U=0: not found
mo...@google.com <mo...@google.com> #7
Note that I've been able to make it work by:
- Adding
<action android:name="com.google.android.gms.wearable.BIND_LISTENER" />
in the intent filter - Removing
<data android:scheme="wear" android:host="*" />
But I feel like this is not something we should do
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #8
I'm really afraid Android 13 might get released as-is, breaking WearOS app communication 😨😨
Description
Please describe your requested enhancement. Good feature requests will solve common problems or enable new use cases.
What you would like to accomplish:
Currently we have a hard limit on labels: Keys and values can contain only lowercase letters, numeric characters, underscores, and dashes. All characters must use UTF-8 encoding, and international characters are allowed. Please add support for space, special Characters, etc.so that it can resolve many issue of integrations with other product.
CMDB, Billing, Etc
How this might work:
Allow use of space, special characters, etc so that it can resolve many issue of integrations with other product.
CMDB, Billing, Etc
If applicable, reasons why alternative solutions are not sufficient:
its limiting us for a use of Label key value pair for other integrated products.
Other information (workarounds you have tried, documentation consulted, etc):