Assigned
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
wb...@google.com
I have forwarded this request to the engineering team. We will update this issue with any progress updates and a resolution.
ma...@gmail.com
Hello! Sorry to bring up this issue after almost a year but I wanted to add that we have chosen metric identifier as agent.googleapis.com/memory/percent_used but autoscaling didnt work out for us either. It would be appraciated if you can guide us.
wb...@google.com
Hi, at the moment we are using the cpu_utilization/target_utilization attribute (in app.yaml) for autoscaling in the app engine flexible environment, however it would be great if we can have the way to mention the memory_utilization metrics as well to decide on the auto scaling. It will give us more control of the auto scaling the instances than now.
di...@techolution.com
Hi, I do not see any memory metrics in neither console nor stackdriver. Is this connected to this issue?
Ha...@mayo.edu
Hello Google team, I was directed to this issue by the support team when we raised concerns around the non availability of memory metrics for Auto Scaling. Is this feature 'released' or in roadmap or not considered ? Please provide some details around this
ba...@google.com
ba...@google.com
Hi ,
Can somebody tell the exact metric for memory based autoscaling
Can somebody tell the exact metric for memory based autoscaling
ca...@google.com
The issue that prevented user labels from appearing in certain PubSub log entries has been fixed.
You can now find these PubSub user labels by using this filter in Logs Explorer:
(protoPayload.request.topic.labels:* OR protoPayload.request.subscription.labels:* OR protoPayload.request.labels:*)
There are certain requests (like the one for
The Product Team continues to explore other alternatives. We will continue updating this Feature Request accordingly.
ca...@google.com
Hello,
Thank you for your patience while we work on addressing this issue. We understand the importance of having custom labels in your audit logs, and our team is actively working on a solution.
In the meantime, we wanted to let you know about a new feature that might be helpful. It was released [1] on October 28th: "Manage log buckets by using tags" [2].
While this new feature is for log buckets instead of log entries, it can also help you organize your billing data. By tagging log buckets associated with specific resources, you can group and analyze your costs more effectively [3].
We recognize that this is not a complete solution to your original request but we are continuing to work on that and will provide updates as soon as possible.
If you need help setting up tags for Log Buckets or have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact Google Cloud Support.
Thanks again for your patience and understanding.
Best regards,
Carlos, on behalf of Google Cloud Support
[1]https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/release-notes#October_28_2024
[2]https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/manage-log-buckets-with-tags
[3]https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/bq-examples#query-with-tags
Thank you for your patience while we work on addressing this issue. We understand the importance of having custom labels in your audit logs, and our team is actively working on a solution.
In the meantime, we wanted to let you know about a new feature that might be helpful. It was released [1] on October 28th: "Manage log buckets by using tags" [2].
While this new feature is for log buckets instead of log entries, it can also help you organize your billing data. By tagging log buckets associated with specific resources, you can group and analyze your costs more effectively [3].
We recognize that this is not a complete solution to your original request but we are continuing to work on that and will provide updates as soon as possible.
If you need help setting up tags for Log Buckets or have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact Google Cloud Support.
Thanks again for your patience and understanding.
Best regards,
Carlos, on behalf of Google Cloud Support
[1]
[2]
[3]
Description
Problem you have encountered:
The cloud components we are deploying in our GCP Projects supports custom labeling at the time of deployment. We are using audit logs for audit tracking of operational changes, But we have noticed that audit logs are missing the custom labels ; so this is a request to add the custom labels in the audit logs these components are generating so that we can apply proper filtering on the audit logs for automation monitoring purpose.
What you expected to happen: Audit logs should contain the custom labels applied during component deployment.
Steps to reproduce: Deploy any component and check the audit logs.