Infeasible
Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
hu...@google.com
It seems you should use com.intellij.psi.PsiClass.getSuperClassType() to check
ma...@gmail.com
Analyzing dynamic features on their own like that doesn't work properly since even though they "depend" on the app they're actually including into an app so for example the unused resource check only makes sense when you look at it from the app perspective, not the other way around.
I believe in 7.0 we've fixed this in the sense that there isn't a lint task on the individual dynamic features.
su...@vid.io
+1. In AGP 7.0 there are no lint tasks in dynamic-features; instead, any dynamic-features are analyzed when running lint on the app module. OP, can you try with AGP 7.0.0-rc01, run lintRelease on the corresponding application module, and see if you still hit the same issue?
mu...@gmail.com
Not using dynamic feature modules but have this with an application module and a library module, happening on 7.0.0-rc01. I haven't figured out a repro yet but will upload one if I manage.
ga...@gmail.com
Re #5, yes, a repro project would be very helpful, thanks!
sa...@kofluence.com
Closing this bug as not reproducible, but please reopen if you have a repro project.
ta...@gmail.com
+1 for this feature, please
ed...@gmail.com
+1 for this feature.
lu...@senti1.com
+1 for this feature
an...@winnin.com
+1 for this feature
fe...@gmail.com
+1
to...@gmail.com
+1
fo...@gmail.com
+1
ro...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ba...@gmail.com
+1, this is very much needed. Recent UI changes on YouTube channels now distinctively separate Videos and Shorts too. Doesn't make sense there is no endpoint for this yet.
mi...@creatoriq.com
let's do this YouTube. as a YTMP partner, I know we have thousands of clients who want this from us!
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ni...@aina.fr
+1 please
ne...@gmail.com
+1
al...@creatorglobal.com
+1
x....@pro-matrix.pl
Comment has been deleted.
er...@gmail.com
+1
pn...@gmail.com
+1
gu...@gmail.com
+1
bt...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
so...@gmail.com
+1 much needed
em...@gmail.com
+1
da...@gmail.com
+1 this is needed
br...@sitecast.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
us...@gmail.com
+1
da...@gmail.com
+1
le...@zefr.com
+1
s....@gmail.com
+1
da...@gmail.com
+1
su...@spacewalk.tech
+1
be...@gmail.com
+1
di...@spotter.la
To be more precisely, it's analytics API. ^-^
br...@lostknoll.dev
+1 can definitely see use cases for influencer marketing and calculating average views with or without shorts included
jh...@gmail.com
+1 Please
ph...@gmail.com
+1
we...@gmail.com
+1
al...@gmail.com
+1
ku...@gmail.com
+1
an...@gmail.com
+1
ho...@gmail.com
+1
vi...@5x.co
Yet even after one year, there is no update on this.
va...@gmail.com
+1
ra...@gmail.com
This is quite urgent, if you use youtube api to fetch youtube videos, so Can anyone help me how to get this.
ge...@gmail.com
I guess this is still a issue..
pe...@gmail.com
+1 this is very much needed.
ca...@amuse.io
+1
fa...@gmail.com
you can use a beautifulsoup and selenium to get shorts from the url...
ka...@affle.com
+1
t....@gmail.com
+1
sa...@gmail.com
+1
sa...@gmail.com
+1
sy...@groupe-gpa.fr
+1
de...@gmail.com
Please please pull this out of your backlog/icebox and prioritize this. I don't believe for a second it is infeasible as the status says. If you have /shorts/ in the URI that only works for shorts videos, then you already have some sort of flag marking those videos as shorts. From an API user point of view, you could accomplish the request by providing a new parameter to the filters for the Videos list resource, something like "isShort" or "videoType". A little work on the back end and you have a working feature that's been requested for over a year now. Sit on your haunches and TikTok will steamroll you.
js...@jschuur.com
At least some further comments on why this is 'infeasible' would be helpful at this point.
an...@gmail.com
+1
cl...@gmail.com
+1
da...@gmail.com
+1
mi...@gmail.com
Comment has been deleted.
fo...@gmail.com
+1
en...@gmail.com
+1
ma...@gmail.com
+1
ma...@gmail.com
+1
cl...@gmail.com
Я за вариант с фильтром, чтобы можно было не только знать, является ли видео коротким, но и была возможность отдельно получить короткие и отдельно обычные видео.
ba...@gmail.com
+1
ab...@gmail.com
we need it pls
t....@gmail.com
+1
ro...@gmail.com
+1
Why doesn't this feature exist yet?
Why doesn't this feature exist yet?
ga...@gmail.com
+1 It would be nice if the information was given in ContentDetails
pa...@gmail.com
+1 need this feature for my integration
bu...@gmail.com
+1
ab...@gmail.com
+1
gu...@gmail.com
+1 Need for showing thumbnails
bz...@gmail.com
+1
ma...@gmail.com
+1
ka...@gmail.com
+1
ch...@gmail.com
+1
nu...@live.jp
+1
ma...@gmail.com
+1
ds...@gmail.com
+1. Please add this functionality.
cl...@gmail.com
+ 1
gr...@googlemail.com
+1 this is needed!
ko...@gmail.com
+ 1 add pls
tu...@gmail.com
Comment has been deleted.
cu...@gmail.com
+1
st...@gmail.com
+1
w....@googlemail.com
Are there any news on this one?
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
sm...@gmail.com
+1
gr...@gmail.com
+1
me...@gmail.com
+1
vi...@vid.io
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
kh...@gmail.com
+1
ba...@gmail.com
+1
be...@gmail.com
+1
wa...@gmail.com
+1
vl...@gmail.com
+1
pe...@gmail.com
+1
sa...@gmail.com
+64
le...@foryougrowth.net
+100000
wo...@gmail.com
+∞
bh...@flintzy.com
+++++1
le...@gmail.com
+1
za...@gmail.com
+1
ma...@gmail.com
+1
mu...@gmail.com
+1
mr...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
cy...@gmail.com
+1
ko...@gmail.com
+1
da...@trueanthem.com
+1 :-(
hu...@sciencebuddies.org
+1
du...@gmail.com
+100,000,000 :o/
ka...@gmail.com
+1
sa...@gmail.com
+1
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]>
+1
ta...@gmail.com
+1
gu...@gmail.com
+1
sa...@yahoo.co.uk
+1
rm...@googlemail.com
+1
se...@gmail.com
+1
de...@blink.mk
+1
je...@gmail.com
+1
mr...@gmail.com
+1
75...@gmail.com
+1 !!
gu...@gmail.com
+!
js...@jschuur.com
Regarding the Playback details / creatorContentType of 'SHORTS' mentioned in
The former is just for channel owners right?
ot...@gmail.com
+1
su...@gmail.com
+1
p....@gmail.com
Comment has been deleted.
ma...@social.quest
+1
ma...@social.quest
+1
jm...@tegna.com
+1
pi...@gmail.com
+1
tr...@triathlon.org
+1
co...@gmail.com
+1
ni...@gmail.com
+1
ni...@aina.fr
+1 please
Ha...@mail.schwarz
+1
ma...@gmail.com
+1 here
cr...@gmail.com
+1
iv...@gmail.com
+1
zh...@gmail.com
+2
jp...@gmail.com
+1
st...@gmail.com
This is so obvious of a need, it hurts. C'mon YouTube, this can't be much of an ask.
se...@gmail.com
+100
ke...@gmail.com
Why. Why it is not implemented by default.
ta...@gmail.com
+1
jo...@gmail.com
I'm late to the party... But yeah - come on YT, it's so obvious it hurts
kr...@gmail.com
+1. Crazy that there is no flag in the response if the video is a short!
an...@gmail.com
+11
ka...@dashsocial.com
+1
jo...@gmail.com
+1
jo...@goalcast.com
+1
da...@gmail.com
+1
Looks like I've found workaround. Shorts always have empty Description.
Looks like I've found workaround. Shorts always have empty Description.
sl...@gmail.com
+1
ai...@gmail.com
+1
ja...@gmail.com
+1
Crazy that we have to ask for this.
Crazy that we have to ask for this.
ra...@hotmail.com
+1
ki...@gmail.com
+1 for this feature. We need this.
ju...@gmail.com
+1
lo...@gmail.com
+1 much needed
ab...@later.com
+1 need this feature desperately
el...@creativex.com Restricted
Restricted
Comment has been deleted.
ha...@later.com
What's your problem? This is for a different API... I got my hopes up for nothing!
js...@jschuur.com
To confirm my original request when I filed this: This was to find out from the YouTube Data API if a video is a Short. Unrelated to the Google Ads API as was listed above in
Ideally, the videos/list endpoint would include this info.
As it stands, this issue is not yet resolved.
gm...@gmail.com
I can't believe this hasn't been solved yet. I'm pulling my hair trying to figure out a way to filter out Short videos from my API calls!!!
hu...@google.com
dr...@gmail.com
+1 this should have been implemented a long time ago
co...@gmail.com
+1
This isn't infeasible, this is because Google intentionally wants to make it difficult to tell whether a video is a short or not. They don't return the aspect ratio in their API calls despite having the data available. Apparently previously you could use the width and height of thumbnails to determine (width < height = short) but they now flip the values so they're always shown as landscape. Their RSS feed shows the width and height of the player, not the video itself, so it's always landscape as well.
The only thing we can hope for is if shorts get killed off as a failed experiment, like so many other Google products end up.
This isn't infeasible, this is because Google intentionally wants to make it difficult to tell whether a video is a short or not. They don't return the aspect ratio in their API calls despite having the data available. Apparently previously you could use the width and height of thumbnails to determine (width < height = short) but they now flip the values so they're always shown as landscape. Their RSS feed shows the width and height of the player, not the video itself, so it's always landscape as well.
The only thing we can hope for is if shorts get killed off as a failed experiment, like so many other Google products end up.
Description
There does not appear to be a way to identify from any of the parts of a video or channel list request in the YouTube v3 Data API to tell if a video is a Short or not. Could we get this officially supported?
One (unofficial) workaround right now is to construct a URL using 'shorts' and the video ID (e.g.https://www.youtube.com/shorts/v=B-s71n0dHUk and then see if you get a 303 redirect (not a Short) or a 200 HTTP status report (Short).