Fixed
Status Update
Comments
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #2
Yigit, do you have time to fix it?
reemission of the same liveData is racy
reemission of the same liveData is racy
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #3
yea i'll take it.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #4
Thanks for the detailed analysis. This may not be an issue anymore since we've started using Main.immediate there but I' not sure; I'll try to create a test case.
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #5
just emitting same live data reproduces the issue.
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #6
With 2.2.0-alpha04 (that use Main.immediate), the issue seems to be still there (I tested it by calling emitSource() twice, like your test case)
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #7
yea sorry immediate does not fix it.
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/frameworks/support/+/1112186
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #8
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/1112186
https://goto.google.com/android-sha1/af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #9
and in 2.3.5 you do have a return statement there
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #10
You're right, looks like we didn't add it back when we made
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #11
I n what version we can expect to get it back?
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #12
any news? :)
be...@google.com <be...@google.com> #13
The statement was removed during the migration to V2, when we did not expect this problem to occur.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #14
Can you give an ETA please of the fix?
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #15
any news? :)
fo...@gmail.com <fo...@gmail.com> #16
Hi there, I face the same issue. Any progress so far?
pa...@outlook.com <pa...@outlook.com> #17
Hey!
Same issue in my project. Any update here?
Same issue in my project. Any update here?
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #18
Project: platform/frameworks/support
Branch: androidx-main
commit 0c4ad1856d1b956d8a0da8074557a5a69fb130d9
Author: Jeremy Woods <jbwoods@google.com>
Date: Tue Aug 30 16:16:49 2022
Fix navigating to Activities from unloaded modules
Currently, if you are using dynamic Navigation and you attempt to
navigate to a Activity in a module that has not yet be loaded, a
ClassNotFoundException is thrown. This is because the
DynamicActivityNavigator currently attempts to install the module (which
is an async operation) and then immediately navigates to the new class.
Instead, we should return after the install attempt and then allow the
systme to retry the navigation at the appropriate time.
RelNote: "Dynamic Navigation now properly attempts to install Activity
destinations from other modules before navigating to them."
Test: tested on a device using bundletool
Bug: 240292838
Change-Id: Ia2c1645426d2f6a5958a10379a99f2aade3dd03a
M navigation/navigation-dynamic-features-runtime/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/dynamicfeatures/DynamicActivityNavigator.kt
https://android-review.googlesource.com/2199792
Branch: androidx-main
commit 0c4ad1856d1b956d8a0da8074557a5a69fb130d9
Author: Jeremy Woods <jbwoods@google.com>
Date: Tue Aug 30 16:16:49 2022
Fix navigating to Activities from unloaded modules
Currently, if you are using dynamic Navigation and you attempt to
navigate to a Activity in a module that has not yet be loaded, a
ClassNotFoundException is thrown. This is because the
DynamicActivityNavigator currently attempts to install the module (which
is an async operation) and then immediately navigates to the new class.
Instead, we should return after the install attempt and then allow the
systme to retry the navigation at the appropriate time.
RelNote: "Dynamic Navigation now properly attempts to install Activity
destinations from other modules before navigating to them."
Test: tested on a device using bundletool
Bug: 240292838
Change-Id: Ia2c1645426d2f6a5958a10379a99f2aade3dd03a
M navigation/navigation-dynamic-features-runtime/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/dynamicfeatures/DynamicActivityNavigator.kt
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #19
This has been fixed internally and will be released in Navigation 2.5.2
and 2.6.0-alpha01
.
na...@google.com <na...@google.com> #20
This bug was linked in a change in the following release(s):
androidx.navigation:navigation-dynamic-features-runtime:2.6.0-alpha01
androidx.navigation:navigation-dynamic-features-runtime:2.5.2
Description
Version used: 2.5.0
Devices/Android versions reproduced on: all
package androidx.navigation.dynamicfeatures
public class DynamicActivityNavigator
return statement is missing here after install manager call.
It causes application to crash because you're navigating to not existing class yet.
Fatal Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException
Unable to instantiate activity ComponentInfo{...}: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Didn't find class "com....Activity" on path: DexPathList[.....]