Assigned
Status Update
Comments
jd...@google.com <jd...@google.com> #2
I have forwarded this request to the engineering team. We will update this issue with any progress updates and a resolution.
Best Regards,
Josh Moyer
Google Cloud Platform Support
Best Regards,
Josh Moyer
Google Cloud Platform Support
kr...@cadence.com <kr...@cadence.com> #3
This is not only useful for IP addresses, but also for many other resources. I understand that names are currently used as identifiers, so this request is probably not trivial to implement. Maybe distinguishing between a (numeric, automatically generated) identifier and a (textual) label is the way to go?
Description
This will create a public issue which anybody can view and comment on.
Please provide as much information as possible. At least, this should include a description of your issue and steps to reproduce the problem. If possible please provide a summary of what steps or workarounds you have already tried, and any docs or articles you found (un)helpful.
Problem you have encountered: A folder cannot be excluded in the sink filter options
What you expected to happen: A customer can exclude an entire folder from the filter options using
For example: resource.type="app_script_function" AND source(folders/123456789)
Steps to reproduce:
Other information (workarounds you have tried, documentation consulted, etc):
Tried to exclude using resource format: Resource Example query
Organization source(organizations/ORGANIZATION_ID)
Folder source(folders/FOLDER_ID)
Cloud projects source(projects/PROJECT_ID)
Result: filtering is not working as expected