Assigned
Status Update
Comments
ra...@google.com <ra...@google.com> #2
Thanks for your suggestion! We are currently evaluating this request, but do not have any plans to implement it at the moment. Please star to add your vote and receive further updates, and feel free to add any comments to discuss your use case.
Description
===========================================================================================
#REMINDER: Please do not disclose any possible PII such as: email address, IP, contact number, any part of name, project numbers and billing accounts as these information may violate security and privacy. Comments or attachments that include PII will be removed and restricted from public viewing.
Furthermore, please refrain from replying to a comment as this will make your email address visible. Instead, you may use the Issue Tracker’s comment feature for your replies.
It is OK to share your API Project ID, but _not_ API keys or client ID credentials.
To learn more about personal data, visit
===========================================================================================
Issue report
----------------
IMPORTANT: If you are seeing an incorrect location from the geocoder,
please go to
select to "report an issue" to ensure it gets routed appropriately. Do not
file the issue here.
If you are seeing an unexpected response that only occurs when using the
API and does not occur when using
include a link with your geocoding request, or to a webpage demonstrating
the issue.
When requesting to Reverse Geocode API with following location
GET
I get "Santo Antônio do Leverger" as "administrative_area_level_2", and also "Campo Verde" as "administrative_area_level_2". More over I got "Caité" as "administrative_area_level_4" which is incorrect as it is a brazilian city name (level 2).
But when I search that same location into google maps, it returns Caité, State of Mato Grosso.
I really don't know which one of three cities are the correct answer, but I think Reverse Geocode API should return only one of them as level 2.