Fixed
Status Update
Comments
em...@google.com <em...@google.com> #2
This was broken by 3bca759a5ff08352de831bb1e9b61b1ec2b3362d.
Fix (pending) is I2c2dc7b600603ee430fd0d91b23d52ea8aa29ca9.
Fix (pending) is I2c2dc7b600603ee430fd0d91b23d52ea8aa29ca9.
lo...@gmail.com <lo...@gmail.com> #3
Comment has been deleted.
em...@google.com <em...@google.com> #4
Since there is no progression, I wanted to share our quick-fix for the issue.
#sdkmanager --package_file=${PATH_WORKSPACE}/packages
while read p; do echo "y" | sdkmanager "${p}"; done <${PATH_WORKSPACE}/packages
#sdkmanager --package_file=${PATH_WORKSPACE}/packages
while read p; do echo "y" | sdkmanager "${p}"; done <${PATH_WORKSPACE}/packages
em...@google.com <em...@google.com> #5
jb...@google.com What is the update on this?
em...@google.com <em...@google.com> #6
What is the status of this item?
jo...@google.com <jo...@google.com> #7
This has been fixed on master today (internal ref: ag/2945015) and will be available in the next SDK release.
jo...@google.com <jo...@google.com> #8
Any ETA on next release?
jo...@google.com <jo...@google.com> #9
Still broken and not updated? --package_file argument is not usable in it's current form on 26.1.1 straight from the developer site.
jo...@google.com <jo...@google.com> #10
Comfirmed that this seems to still be broken. Can we have an update please?
```
(15:58:11) C02W513SHTD8:files aso$ /opt/android-sdk-macosx/tools/bin/sdkmanager --version
26.1.1
(15:58:17) C02W513SHTD8:files aso$ /opt/android-sdk-macosx/tools/bin/sdkmanager --install --package_file=package_file
Warning: Unknown argument --package_file=package_file
```
```
(15:58:11) C02W513SHTD8:files aso$ /opt/android-sdk-macosx/tools/bin/sdkmanager --version
26.1.1
(15:58:17) C02W513SHTD8:files aso$ /opt/android-sdk-macosx/tools/bin/sdkmanager --install --package_file=package_file
Warning: Unknown argument --package_file=package_file
```
em...@google.com <em...@google.com> #11
Hi, is there any update to this issue? Thanks.
em...@google.com <em...@google.com> #12
Hi Google. You claim it's been fixed on master, but we haven't had a new release since the broken version 26.1.1. Can you please release the fix?
jo...@google.com <jo...@google.com> #13
Yeah, still not fixed --'
jo...@google.com <jo...@google.com> #14
Can't believe this still isn't fixed 2 years later for a command line utility that sits on the main dev site.
Description
Repro Instructions:
lib/
folder (under any ABI)Expected result:
libmyapplication.so
Actual result:
liblog.so
,libmyapplication.so