Fixed
Status Update
Comments
il...@google.com <il...@google.com> #2
We gave up upgrading to Room because we need to use FTS3/FTS4 virtual tables. Any plants to support it?
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #3
Florina Muntenescu (Android developer advocate at Google) told me that FTS support will definitely NOT be in Room 1.0 final. It is postponed to an indeterminate later version.
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #4
It is possible to work with virtual tables and fts4 while using Room v1. You just need to create and access it by yourself using sql queries. Not perfect but it works for me (just did it a few days ago).
Can't wait for this feature to be in Room
Can't wait for this feature to be in Room
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #5
If your FTS tables are separate from the rest of your model it's a viable solution. Mine are fully integrated with my model (almost all queries have JOINs with virtual tables) so it's a no-go.
na...@google.com <na...@google.com> #6
any news?
Description
Using Compose within Fragments require setting a differenthttps://developer.android.com/jetpack/compose/interop/interop-apis#composition-strategy it is still a common 'gotcha' that developers frequently run into as per feedback we've received from partners ( b/229427938 ).
ViewCompositionStrategy
(DisposeOnViewTreeLifecycleDestroyed
) so that the composition follows the fragment's view lifecycle. While we do document this behavior inTo prevent developers from making this mistake, we can improve the DevEx by either:
ComposeView
in a fragment (preferred - works for existing implementations)ComposeFragment
(less preferred - requires awareness of this new component, also can be confused with fragment-in-compose use case)