Status Update
Comments
co...@google.com <co...@google.com>
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #3
After some brief poking around:
Relevant code in LayoutNode:
Ends up here:
If accessibility is off, looks like changing progress semantics a no op which would be a big improvement to performance.
Otherwise semantics does a remeasure / relayout, and walks the full semantics tree. This would likely have no immediate benefit if accessibility is turned on.
co...@google.com <co...@google.com>
na...@google.com <na...@google.com> #4
Would this suggestion also avoid recomposing, which seems like it would still be a problem even if it's a no-op in the guts of semantic node code.
Description
The following Experimental APIs have existed for several releases.
Please consider stabilising or removing these APIs: