Status Update
Comments
lp...@google.com <lp...@google.com> #2
reemission of the same liveData is racy
lp...@google.com <lp...@google.com> #3
ti...@google.com <ti...@google.com> #4
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #5
@Test
fun raceTest() {
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData)
emitSource(subLiveData) //crashes
}
subject.addObserver().apply {
testScope.advanceUntilIdle()
}
}
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #6
ti...@google.com <ti...@google.com> #7
I actually have a WIP fix for it:
if your case is the one i found (emitting same LiveData multiple times, as shown in #5) you can work around it by adding a dummy transformation.
val subLiveData = MutableLiveData(1)
val subject = liveData(testScope.coroutineContext) {
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it })
emitSource(subLiveData.map {it} )
}
ti...@google.com <ti...@google.com> #8
Branch: androidx-master-dev
commit af12e75e6b4110f48e44ca121466943909de8f06
Author: Yigit Boyar <yboyar@google.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 12:58:11 2019
Fix coroutine livedata race condition
This CL fixes a bug in liveData builder where emitting same
LiveData source twice would make it crash because the second
emission registry could possibly happen before first one is
removed as source.
We fix it by using a suspending dispose function. It does feel
a bit hacky but we cannot make DisposableHandle.dispose async
and we do not want to block there. This does not mean that there
is a problem if developer disposes it manually since our emit
functions take care of making sure it disposes (and there is
no other way to add source to the underlying MediatorLiveData)
Bug: 140249349
Test: BuildLiveDataTest#raceTest_*
Change-Id: I0b464c242a583da4669af195cf2504e2adc4de40
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/public_plus_experimental_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_2.2.0-alpha05.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/api/restricted_current.txt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/main/java/androidx/lifecycle/CoroutineLiveData.kt
M lifecycle/lifecycle-livedata-ktx/src/test/java/androidx/lifecycle/BuildLiveDataTest.kt
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #9
Pressing the menu and swapping between screen1 and screen2 as seen in
It fails very quickly on API 29 from my testing, on higher API levels it takes a few times.
ti...@google.com <ti...@google.com> #10
Thanks for sharing the repro steps. I was able to repro with a fair amount of rapid switching between destinations.
Here's the stacktrace I see. Since I don't have the logging in AnimatedHost
, I'm not sure whether this is the same crash as #6.
Jeremy, it'd be helpful if you could post the full stacktrace with the logging from AnimatedHost, so I can compare the composable involved in the crash with the destination that was removed.
2023-02-15 13:23:25.057 31458-31458 AndroidRuntime com.andreirozov.sample E FATAL EXCEPTION: main
Process: com.andreirozov.sample, PID: 31458
java.lang.IllegalStateException: You cannot access the NavBackStackEntry's ViewModels after the NavBackStackEntry is destroyed.
at androidx.navigation.NavBackStackEntry.getViewModelStore(NavBackStackEntry.kt:202)
at androidx.lifecycle.viewmodel.compose.ViewModelKt.get(ViewModel.kt:206)
at androidx.lifecycle.viewmodel.compose.ViewModelKt.get$default(ViewModel.kt:195)
at androidx.lifecycle.viewmodel.compose.ViewModelKt.viewModel(ViewModel.kt:120)
at com.andreirozov.sample.ui.standings.screen2.Screen2TabKt.AnotherScreen(Screen2Tab.kt:84)
at com.andreirozov.sample.ui.AppNavGraphKt$AppNavGraph$5$1$1$2.invoke(AppNavGraph.kt:94)
at com.andreirozov.sample.ui.AppNavGraphKt$AppNavGraph$5$1$1$2.invoke(AppNavGraph.kt:89)
at androidx.compose.runtime.internal.ComposableLambdaImpl.invoke(ComposableLambda.jvm.kt:116)
at androidx.compose.runtime.internal.ComposableLambdaImpl$invoke$1.invoke(ComposableLambda.jvm.kt:127)
at androidx.compose.runtime.internal.ComposableLambdaImpl$invoke$1.invoke(ComposableLambda.jvm.kt:127)
at androidx.compose.runtime.RecomposeScopeImpl.compose(RecomposeScopeImpl.kt:162)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.recomposeToGroupEnd(Composer.kt:2435)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.skipCurrentGroup(Composer.kt:2703)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl$doCompose$2$5.invoke(Composer.kt:3326)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl$doCompose$2$5.invoke(Composer.kt:3304)
at androidx.compose.runtime.SnapshotStateKt__DerivedStateKt.observeDerivedStateRecalculations(DerivedState.kt:341)
at androidx.compose.runtime.SnapshotStateKt.observeDerivedStateRecalculations(Unknown Source:1)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.doCompose(Composer.kt:3304)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.recompose$runtime_release(Composer.kt:3269)
at androidx.compose.runtime.CompositionImpl.recompose(Composition.kt:771)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer.performRecompose(Recomposer.kt:1047)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer.access$performRecompose(Recomposer.kt:124)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer$runRecomposeAndApplyChanges$2$2.invoke(Recomposer.kt:541)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer$runRecomposeAndApplyChanges$2$2.invoke(Recomposer.kt:510)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiFrameClock$withFrameNanos$2$callback$1.doFrame(AndroidUiFrameClock.android.kt:34)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiDispatcher.performFrameDispatch(AndroidUiDispatcher.android.kt:109)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiDispatcher.access$performFrameDispatch(AndroidUiDispatcher.android.kt:41)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiDispatcher$dispatchCallback$1.doFrame(AndroidUiDispatcher.android.kt:69)
at android.view.Choreographer$CallbackRecord.run(Choreographer.java:1229)
at android.view.Choreographer$CallbackRecord.run(Choreographer.java:1239)
at android.view.Choreographer.doCallbacks(Choreographer.java:899)
at android.view.Choreographer.doFrame(Choreographer.java:827)
at android.view.Choreographer$FrameDisplayEventReceiver.run(Choreographer.java:1214)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:942)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce(Looper.java:201)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:288)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:7898)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:548)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:936)
Suppressed: kotlinx.coroutines.DiagnosticCoroutineContextException: [androidx.compose.runtime.PausableMonotonicFrameClock@9d17257, androidx.compose.ui.platform.MotionDurationScaleImpl@54e6144, StandaloneCoroutine{Cancelling}@29a522d, AndroidUiDispatcher@c8ce362]
ti...@google.com <ti...@google.com> #11
The log prior to the crash indicates Screen2's Scaffold recomposed after the BackStackEntry
's lifecyle has been updated to DESTROYED, presumably from markTransitionComplete
, which happens after AnimatedContent remove Screen2 from composition. Recomposing after being removed from composition looks like the same issue as
com.andreirozov.sample D navigating to screen1
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample D navigating to screen2
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is STARTED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold STARTED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is STARTED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold STARTED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is STARTED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold RESUMED
com.andreirozov.sample D navigating to screen1
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state is CREATED
com.andreirozov.sample E Standing back stack entry state in Scaffold DESTROYED
com.andreirozov.sample E FATAL EXCEPTION: main
jb...@google.com <jb...@google.com> #12
Yep same one:
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen1
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
I Skipped 40 frames! The application may be doing too much work on its main thread.
D Installing profile for com.andreirozov.sample
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen1
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen1
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
D navigating to screen2
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen1
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen2
E screen2 entry state outside Scaffold is STARTED
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen2
E screen2 entry state in Scaffold STARTED
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen2
E screen2 entry state outside Scaffold is STARTED
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen2
E screen2 entry state outside Scaffold is RESUMED
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
E screen2 entry state in Scaffold RESUMED
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen2
E screen2 entry state outside Scaffold is RESUMED
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen2
E screen2 entry state outside Scaffold is RESUMED
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen2
E screen2 entry state in Scaffold RESUMED
D navigating to screen1
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen2
E screen2 entry state outside Scaffold is CREATED
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen1
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen2
D transition targetState: screen1
I Background young concurrent copying GC freed 53694(1896KB) AllocSpace objects, 0(0B) LOS objects, 25% free, 4767KB/6441KB, paused 7.336ms total 70.605ms
D Current entry being composed in AnimatedContent screen1
D Outside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
D Inside of conditional
D transition currentState: screen1
D transition targetState: screen1
E screen2 entry state in Scaffold DESTROYED
E FATAL EXCEPTION: main
Process: com.andreirozov.sample, PID: 2772
java.lang.IllegalStateException: You cannot access the NavBackStackEntry's ViewModels after the NavBackStackEntry is destroyed.
at androidx.navigation.NavBackStackEntry.getViewModelStore(NavBackStackEntry.kt:202)
at androidx.lifecycle.viewmodel.compose.ViewModelKt.get(ViewModel.kt:206)
at androidx.lifecycle.viewmodel.compose.ViewModelKt.get$default(ViewModel.kt:195)
at androidx.lifecycle.viewmodel.compose.ViewModelKt.viewModel(ViewModel.kt:120)
at com.andreirozov.sample.ui.standings.screen2.Screen2TabKt.AnotherScreen(Screen2Tab.kt:84)
at com.andreirozov.sample.ui.AppNavGraphKt$AppNavGraph$5$1$1$2.invoke(AppNavGraph.kt:94)
at com.andreirozov.sample.ui.AppNavGraphKt$AppNavGraph$5$1$1$2.invoke(AppNavGraph.kt:89)
at androidx.compose.runtime.internal.ComposableLambdaImpl.invoke(ComposableLambda.jvm.kt:116)
at androidx.compose.runtime.internal.ComposableLambdaImpl$invoke$1.invoke(ComposableLambda.jvm.kt:127)
at androidx.compose.runtime.internal.ComposableLambdaImpl$invoke$1.invoke(ComposableLambda.jvm.kt:127)
at androidx.compose.runtime.RecomposeScopeImpl.compose(RecomposeScopeImpl.kt:162)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.recomposeToGroupEnd(Composer.kt:2435)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.skipCurrentGroup(Composer.kt:2703)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl$doCompose$2$5.invoke(Composer.kt:3326)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl$doCompose$2$5.invoke(Composer.kt:3304)
at androidx.compose.runtime.SnapshotStateKt__DerivedStateKt.observeDerivedStateRecalculations(DerivedState.kt:341)
at androidx.compose.runtime.SnapshotStateKt.observeDerivedStateRecalculations(Unknown Source:1)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.doCompose(Composer.kt:3304)
at androidx.compose.runtime.ComposerImpl.recompose$runtime_release(Composer.kt:3269)
at androidx.compose.runtime.CompositionImpl.recompose(Composition.kt:771)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer.performRecompose(Recomposer.kt:1047)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer.access$performRecompose(Recomposer.kt:124)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer$runRecomposeAndApplyChanges$2$2.invoke(Recomposer.kt:541)
at androidx.compose.runtime.Recomposer$runRecomposeAndApplyChanges$2$2.invoke(Recomposer.kt:510)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiFrameClock$withFrameNanos$2$callback$1.doFrame(AndroidUiFrameClock.android.kt:34)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiDispatcher.performFrameDispatch(AndroidUiDispatcher.android.kt:109)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiDispatcher.access$performFrameDispatch(AndroidUiDispatcher.android.kt:41)
at androidx.compose.ui.platform.AndroidUiDispatcher$dispatchCallback$1.doFrame(AndroidUiDispatcher.android.kt:69)
at android.view.Choreographer$CallbackRecord.run(Choreographer.java:964)
at android.view.Choreographer.doCallbacks(Choreographer.java:790)
at android.view.Choreographer.doFrame(Choreographer.java:721)
at android.view.Choreographer$FrameDisplayEventReceiver.run(Choreographer.java:951)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:883)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:100)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:214)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:7356)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:492)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:930)
Suppressed: kotlinx.coroutines.DiagnosticCoroutineContextException: [androidx.compose.runtime.PausableMonotonicFrameClock@7ebb51b, androidx.compose.ui.platform.MotionDurationScaleImpl@e6c86b8, StandaloneCoroutine{Cancelling}@f919c91, AndroidUiDispatcher@7da07f6]
I Sending signal. PID: 2772 SIG: 9
ti...@google.com <ti...@google.com> #13
Thanks Jeremy.
The logging in #12 also confirms Scaffold's behavior of recomposing after being removed from composition. Marking this a dup of
mo...@gmail.com <mo...@gmail.com> #14
ap...@google.com <ap...@google.com> #15
Branch: androidx-main
commit aeb4b9fc4ddeca49fcb2812ce828cc7be11beb30
Author: Jeremy Woods <jbwoods@google.com>
Date: Tue Aug 08 17:15:11 2023
Fix issue with changing state as part of composition
We should not change state as part of composition as that can cause
inconsistent behavior when reading state. We should instead only ever
change state in an Effect.
RelNote: "Fixed an issues in Navigation with Compose where when using a
Scaffold it was possible to get an error trying to access a DESTROYED
ViewModel"
Test: Added test in NavHostTest
Bug: 268422136
Change-Id: I1dc115fc2b454d68c1a23c78e72707d6d4c739a5
M navigation/navigation-compose/src/androidTest/java/androidx/navigation/compose/NavHostTest.kt
M navigation/navigation-compose/src/main/java/androidx/navigation/compose/NavHost.kt
na...@google.com <na...@google.com> #16
The following release(s) address this bug.It is possible this bug has only been partially addressed:
androidx.navigation:navigation-compose:2.8.0-alpha01
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #17
Hello,
these changes in fact introduced in 2.7.1
are creating issues in our architecture. Basically we are no longer able to receive Lifecycle.Event.ON_DESTROY
as it is now triggered after onDispose
where we are unsubscribing a lifecycle observer. (Sample attached)
fun attachLifeCycleObserver(onDestroy:() -> Unit) {
val lifecycle = LocalLifecycleOwner.current.lifecycle
DisposableEffect(lifecycle) {
val eventObserver = LifecycleEventObserver { source, event ->
println("PACMAC -- event:${event.name} targetState:${event.targetState.name} source:${source.toString()}")
if (event == Lifecycle.Event.ON_DESTROY) {
onDestroy()
}
}
lifecycle.addObserver(eventObserver)
onDispose {
// We unsubscribe here but since 2.7.1 we are no longer receiving ON_DESTROY as it is actually triggered after onDispose
lifecycle.removeObserver(eventObserver)
}
}
}
We are using onDestroy
to run some cleanup but only if the nav destination is popped of the backstack.
Description
This is fromhttps://github.com/google/accompanist/issues/1487 :
I haven't been able to reproduce it without a lot of experimental APIs along with Navigation. But essentially given the following:
There are cases where the areas end up being composed in this order:
1, 3, 2
withAnimatedContent
completing the transition and then the Scaffold composing its content.The expectation was that it would always be
1, 2, 3
with the composition of theScaffold
content completing before the callback to area 3.Is the expectation correct? Or does
AnimatedContent
completion have some priority over theScaffold
?This could also be something going on in
Scaffold
, just wondering what the expectations are here.