Status Update
No update yet.
Comments
ha...@google.com
au...@google.com
i donnot understand why is the data the same?
pa...@google.com
au...@google.com
What steps are needed to reproduce this issue? Frequency of occurrence?
Which Android build are you using? (e.g. AP4A.241205.013.A1)
Which device did you use to reproduce this issue?
Can you confirm if this issue is reproducible on a Pixel/Nexus device?
Please provide a sample project or apk to reproduce the issue. Also mention the steps to be followed for reproducing the issue with the given sample project or apk.
Android bug report (to be captured after reproducing the issue)
For steps to capture a bug report, please refer:
Alternate method
Navigate to “Developer options”, ensure “USB debugging” is enabled, then enable “Bug report shortcut”. Capture bug report by holding the power button and selecting the “Take bug report” option.
Note: Please upload the bug report and screenshot to google drive and share the folder to android-bugreport@google.com, then share the link here.
gh...@google.com
Please provide the requested information to proceed further. Unfortunately the issue will be closed within 7 days if there is no further update.
pa...@google.com
for example,we hava 100 users.
20 users returned the same location information, longitude is 121.474000 and latitude is 31.230001。
30 users returned the same location information, longitude is 122.474000 and latitude is 32.230001。
15 users returned the same location information, longitude is 120.474000 and latitude is 30.230001。
as for Android build,all versions have it.
I dont reprodouce this issue.
what may be the cause of this issue?please
au...@google.com
We have shared this with our product and engineering team and will update this issue with more information as it becomes available.
au...@google.com
Thanks for reporting this issue.
COARSE_LOCATION typically takes location information from the nearby cell tower. If many users are near the same cell tower, each of those users will be given the same position. Using a FINE position will give much more detailed information.
Also, in certain areas, for privacy reasons, a less-exact location will be given, and that less-exact location might be identical for many users. Again, a fine-location configuration will return more precise location data.
pa...@google.com
We believe with reference to the above comment, your query has been answered, hence closing the bug. Please feel free to re-open the issue in the future if desired.
sp...@google.com
pa...@google.com
Hmm, good question. My instinct is that it should probably be an option because most users will probably appreciate being able to understand where baselined issues have come from (which specific line in a file) given a freshly generated baseline file. In particular, multiple "identical" issues that occur within one file can look a bit strange when are no line numbers to disambiguate. I could be wrong here, though; perhaps nobody really looks at baseline files, or perhaps most users don't use them at all. I also assume that a lot of users (especially for smaller codebases) are not worried about merging branches that contain (regenerated) baseline files. aurimas@ might have an opinion on whether the situation is likely to occur in other codebases.
au...@google.com
We dont need baseline numbers because we maintain downstream branches that make it super painful of the line numbers are included as it causes continuous merge conflicts. I suspect most users dont have such set up, and might prefer line numbers as suggested in #11
sp...@google.com
You can set android.lint.baselineOmitLineNumbers=true starting in AGP 8.2.0-alpha07.
Description
This is a feature request for Android Gradle Plugin to do this for us. AndroidX currently has a task that intercepts the xml and does this rewrite and we'd like to drop that hack.