IssueTracker

Lint options:

    lintOptions {
        lintConfig = file('lint.xml')

        abortOnError true
        xmlReport true
        htmlReport true
        checkDependencies true
    }

Also, our project has custom lint rules. Failure happens with a dependency of 26.6.3 and 27.0.0.

Is any way to downgrade lint runner? This problem is keeping us from using AGP 4.0

Attached slightly different stacktrace for the same problem.

Wonder if disabling some lint rules could help to "fix" this problem, as it is also blocking for us 4.0 AGP upgrade.

Notes:

I suspect the exceptions are happening now because JetBrains recently changed an assert statement into a hard failure (see 3260e41111).

I.e., it's possible that Lint has been hitting this code path all along, and only now it is causing a problem.

This has been difficult to investigate so far because the failure is nondeterministic and also deep inside the Kotlin compiler. Plus, JetBrains seems to be hitting this code path occasionally too (hence why they changed the assert into a hard failure), so I'm not even sure whether Lint is implicated or not.

It could also explain why not all lint rules were working from time to time (https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/149554597). According to Github, this change was done for 1.4-M2, which is considered unstable. Maybe lint runner could use an older but stable version? What else options do I have?

Is any public issue created I could follow?

Has anyone tried this with 4.1.0-beta2? We're using a more recent version of UAST and the Kotlin compiler there. It's not clear that it's fixed but -- there's a chance :-)

I tried. The same error. I am wondering, is any way to know which lint checks cause failure? I have a few custom lint checks. Or, is any way downgrade compiler for lint checks?

I did more tests and probably narrow down a cause. I did all tests on 4.1.0-beta2. Original configuration have enabled checkDependencies and included custom lint checks. Custom lint checks are compiled using 26.6.3 version:

• checkDependencies = true, customLintChecks = true = 20% chance of success
• checkDependencies = true, customLintChecks = false = 57% chance of success
• checkDependencies = false, customLintChecks = true = 100% chance of success

It is a clear evidence that checkDependencies feature is not stable. In addition, custom lint checks is not friendly with checkDependencies and increases the risk of failure. Or maybe just an old lint SDK used is to blame.

It is very similar to this issue in 3.6.3, but instead of skipped checks, we got crashes now.

I have a theory, but do not know how to test. Maybe crashes happening because there are some lint checks from libs built upon old lint SDK version?

To me this is happening on 4.2.0-alpha04 too.

Can someone confirm that this is happening if you have these three conditions met?:

• checkDependencies=true on your app module
• have a custom lint rule using lintChecks on your app module
• have a custom lint rule using lintChecks on your library module

For me the error went away after I removed the lintChecks on the library module.

could you clarify exactly what you mean in these?

have a custom lint rule using lintChecks on your app module have a custom lint rule using lintChecks on your library module

By this I mean a declaration in your modules dependency block:

lintChecks project(":features:language_lint")

As opposed to lintPublish? Or is that not relevant?

For me this is for local checks so I'm using lintChecks. Removing lintChecks from the library module and only applying it on the app module fixed the lint crash. However that's not optimal as I want to run the lint checks individually on the library module as well. It would not be interesting if this is really the cause of the issue or if it doesn't fix it for others.

I do not have any custom lint checks declared but there might be a transient lint check pulled in.

We have checkDependencies=true on our app module and apply there custom lint checks. Disabling custom lint checks has not solved the issue, though we have more custom lint checks via external dependencies (for example, timber).

#14, could you check with checkDependencies=false? It fixes problem on my project. Would be nice to hear more proves.

#15, I've set checkDependencies = false, but left our custom lint checks enabled. So far lint finished successfully without issue errors.

In my case, all builds of the >50 were a success after checkDependencies = false. However, disabling checkDependencies is not a solution as well. Since all our code is split in small logical modules, there is no point in lint. Too many false-positives and true-negatives.

Sorry for my long delay. I was tried with 4.1.0-beta05 (newest version to date), and the problem is still here. I added new log in case lines were changed.

Would anyone be willing to share an open-source project that reproduces this bug?

I have only closed source project with this problem. Maybe someone knows some quite large multimodule opensource project I could try setup AGP with lint and try reproduction?

I tried to reproduce with two small multimodule projects, but all builds works flawlessly. Also, I tried to reproduce using https://github.com/google/iosched, which is quite large. All builds success, just few lint errors found. In contrast, our failing project has 20 modules linted as checkDependencies, and 6 other helper modules. 145k CLOC without tests. I suppose there is a good chance problem happen due to the cache.

It is still strange that the failure is nondeterministic.

It is even non-deterministic in CI/docker builds using the same fresh environment and exactly the same code each time. Build cache and daemon is disabled there. Multithreading should be involved as well.

In addition, I found in most cases failed due to the same file #1. Just failure happens not all the time.